Wilson vs Luck

JSeahawks

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
24,104
Reaction score
45
Location
Milwaukie, Oregon
I want this game really, really badly next week.

I want Wilson to come out and do the Russell Wilson thing. And I want to see the LOB pick off Andrew Luck 2 or 3 times.
 

Jazzhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
10,266
Reaction score
123
I don't really care about who gets what, except that the Seahawks get the win.
 

Hawknight

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
3,279
Reaction score
2,105
Location
Here and there
JSeahawks":m3pjrreg said:
I want this game really, really badly next week.

I want Wilson to come out and do the Russell Wilson thing. And I want to see the LOB pick off Andrew Luck 2 or 3 times.


I'm with you, I work at Stanford and all I hear is Luck this Luck that... #uck Luck.......Wilson has been shaky lately but I really believe he's going to come back..
 

THUGCAPS

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
I wanna see Bevell step up and come out firing in this game
 

davidonmi

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
2,507
Reaction score
0
the best part is a win next week is gravy. We needed to split this 2 game stretch, we've already locked that up. A sweep would be awesome
 

SalishHawkFan

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,872
Reaction score
0
It'll be nice to be up against a low ranked defense for a change. 3 of the first 4 games came against great D's.
 

Crizilla

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 2, 2012
Messages
4,964
Reaction score
1,070
Location
Kirkland
This game is all on our defense. We know Luck is going to pass but just how good will Richardson and their new run game go against us? It's an exciting match up. High scoring for sure.
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
21,042
Reaction score
13,066
Location
Astoria, OR
Hawknight":1m6a15n6 said:
Wilson has been shaky lately but I really believe he's going to come back..

I know you know this but it needs to be said...He's shaky because our OL resembles a M*A*S*H unit right now.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
They are both awesome young men and fantastic football players as well. Their games couldn't be more opposite so and I don't see this as Luck vs. Wilson, at all.

Wilson needs to threaten with the run earlier in games. Good line or crappy line, it's that fear that makes Wilson special. When he is not a threat to run, he becomes less special.

Luck? Luck can do it all. He's special no matter the situation. He can burn you from inside the pocket, or out, and it's a foolish DC that thinks the kid can't / won't run. The next Aaron Rodgers, bank on that.
 

Throwdown

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
24,042
Reaction score
1,327
Location
Tacoma, WA
Luck is good for one INT a game, we need to make them pay for that one INT when it does come.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
Throwdown":1751xuhr said:
Luck is good for one INT a game, we need to make them pay for that one INT when it does come.

I am confident we will do just that. Todays win is going to have legs. We played one of, if not the worst, games of the RW era.....but still wearing party hats on the plane ride home. Extra peanuts for everybody!
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,276
Reaction score
1,148
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
THUGCAPS":3lerrcwt said:
I wanna see Bevell step up and come out firing in this game
Not going to happen. Also, careful about bashing our offensive coordinator. There are those that frown upon it and talk down to you. Besides, Bevell changed up and started calling quick passing plays before long; and by "before long", I mean with 5 minutes remaining in the 3rd quarter. :roll: It only took about 43 QB pressures to get to that.
 

Exittium

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
57
I know luck may look impressive, but in all honesty I'm not sold on the dude, he got picked to an already well built team, with pretty much the same O line that made Manning sound godlike (or at least thats what NFL keeps saying. Without taking into mind the Broncos have the easiest schedule) We still have some building to be done with our O line, but with that In mind I see a lot of picks because Indy and a new run scheme + our defense +pass rush = Luck not knowing what to do
 

LotsOfLuck

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Throwdown":6oxqqx0a said:
Luck is good for one INT a game, we need to make them pay for that one INT when it does come.

If you're going by his career stats maybe that's his average but he's only thrown 2 in his last 7 regular season games. He's improved greatly as you would expect a rookie QB to from his first to second season. Seattle defense will provide a great challenge for him.
 

LotsOfLuck

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Exittium":djjrmt4r said:
I know luck may look impressive, but in all honesty I'm not sold on the dude, he got picked to an already well built team, with pretty much the same O line that made Manning sound godlike (or at least thats what NFL keeps saying. Without taking into mind the Broncos have the easiest schedule) We still have some building to be done with our O line, but with that In mind I see a lot of picks because Indy and a new run scheme + our defense +pass rush = Luck not knowing what to do

The team has been completely rebuilt from the team that surrounded Manning. The style of play is nothing like it used to be. Pagano has built this team to be more physical on both sides of the ball more in the image of the Ravens teams he coached.

That said, I would like our chanced better in this game if we still had the Manning Colts. I think playing smashmouth against the Seahawks is playing your type of game. I would be very confident in our offense in this matchup if Manning were running it. With Luck, I'm not as certain because his success will partially depend on our ability to run the ball successfully. With Manning, running the ball didn't matter nearly as much. It added an extra dimension if we could do it but he was going to put points up with or without it.

Defensively, I am interested to see how our defense holds up against your running game. I understand that you're banged up on the offensive line so that might work into our advantage some.
 

Happypuppy

New member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
1,975
Reaction score
0
Luck is very good. He can move (4.5 40) good size and arm. He seems like a good leader on the field. He still tends to force balls at times, but he is going to be a good one for a long time. It should be a good game.
 

MizzouHawkGal

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
13,478
Reaction score
850
Location
Kansas City, MO
LotsOfLuck":3b1aphq6 said:
Exittium":3b1aphq6 said:
I know luck may look impressive, but in all honesty I'm not sold on the dude, he got picked to an already well built team, with pretty much the same O line that made Manning sound godlike (or at least thats what NFL keeps saying. Without taking into mind the Broncos have the easiest schedule) We still have some building to be done with our O line, but with that In mind I see a lot of picks because Indy and a new run scheme + our defense +pass rush = Luck not knowing what to do

The team has been completely rebuilt from the team that surrounded Manning. The style of play is nothing like it used to be. Pagano has built this team to be more physical on both sides of the ball more in the image of the Ravens teams he coached.

That said, I would like our chanced better in this game if we still had the Manning Colts. I think playing smashmouth against the Seahawks is playing your type of game. I would be very confident in our offense in this matchup if Manning were running it. With Luck, I'm not as certain because his success will partially depend on our ability to run the ball successfully. With Manning, running the ball didn't matter nearly as much. It added an extra dimension if we could do it but he was going to put points up with or without it.

Defensively, I am interested to see how our defense holds up against your running game. I understand that you're banged up on the offensive line so that might work into our advantage some.
Welcome to .Net, for me this is a game I have marked as a loss (for now), that beatdown of San Francisco was impressive. This game should be a slugfest.
 

Kixkahn

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
0
Aros you have that exactly right. It is hard for any quarterback to look good if they are running for their lives majority of the game. Don't forget how many more yards Lynch gets when the line isn't so busted up.
 
Top