I didn’t mock Milroe at any point to the Seahawks, choosing several QBs over him early in the process. However, at the end even with usually ending up with at least12 picks I was hardly choosing QBs at all. Milroe was an afterthought in the simulator I was using, he went from late first, then mid to late 2nd and I wasn’t using those picks on this dude.
But I like the pick in the sense they traded Geno for a Milroe lottery ticket but only after making a lateral move to replace Geno with a similar talent in Sam Darnold.
I love the pick not for the player Milroe is now but for the vision of what he can become in the function of the offensive vision they wish to create.
Love the pick because they avoided both QB pitfalls of having to cater and nurture and give the franchise over to a top 10, top 20 pick, you know ready or not to be the franchise guy, and they also avoided taking a QB in that 20-40 range where you’re losing out on talented players for a shot in the dark even more erratic than the 1st round.
Love the pick because I think Geno Smith extension or not, without 92 or not, Milroe was a guy they had mapped out a conclusive direction for. Picking him at 92 wasn’t a wasted pick, Seahawks had their choice to get any QB in this draft that wasn’t Ward. At 92, only 3 QBs were off the board.
This is a guy with the right motivation and the right coaching that has the ability and skillset to develop into a more athletic version of a younger Russell Wilson. Nasty deep ball that can devastate off play-action paired with rushing ability that is dangerous in RPO style attack.
However, I don’t think the Seahawks took Milroe and told the room we got our franchise QBotF. He like Wilson, is going to have to earn everything and Milroe doesn’t have the pedigree, polish, and poise as a passer Russell had coming out despite being a better running QB. Yet, as I said above they mapped out Milroe to function within their offense. Mac eluded to something regarding Milroe in that he earns it could take at least 10% snaps. Eluding to a role they have in mind which a lot of peeps think is a Taysom Hill type role.
But that 10% to me is a Heroball type role. Both Geno’s and Darnold’s weaknesses are similar, they are good to great QBs in the function of the offense but both leave a lot to be desired in terms of having that extra oomph when it gets tough, when they get rattled and they tend to get more sloppy and less effective when things aren’t working or they are forcing things. I see Milroe as a band-aid to a stalling or sputtering offense in being a guy who can change the pace, change the momentum if he hits on explosive plays that more than less will stress defenses out of their vibe and possibly their game play. Milroe is a dynamic trump card.
Don’t care if he doesn’t get it together or not. If he does develop into something like a bargain bin Lamar Jackson, that’s great. But in the very least he could be a weaponized QB2 that can be implemented into an offensive package and provide explosive, field tilting plays with his athleticism. If he has to start some games, he’s dynamic enough to keep you in games kind of like rookie contract Wilson.
There’s enough to like, some to love, to not really hate the vision of Milroe in this offense to really hate on this pick. If you are expecting anyone to be a bonafide starter at 92 then your expectations are too high. But at the same time the franchise type ceiling is there for the taking with enough hard work and scheme opportunity. But his floor, imo, is dangerous too if leveraged smartly and methodically, too. You can’t really say that about a lot of other QBs in this draft. That’s why Milroe is ultimately a great pick even though I’m not entirely sold on his prospects to become something great. He still can be deadly and productive in a role where he’s not starting. No other QB has that type of ability in this draft.