Trading one of our RBs?

[toffee]

Would Hawks trade one of our premium RBs to move up in the draft? Trading K9 to move from #18 to top 10? or K9 for Ramsey?

https://x.com/SlickRickScoops/status/1914689708455534757

 

[Kamcussionator]

There are a ton of backs in the draft and I'm sure we'll be shopping for a FB (Skatteboo!) so it would be nice to move one of them. I don't think K9 is all that valuable due to his injury history. Maybe get a 4th?

 

[Hawkamaniac]

I love Walker and would really like to see him behind a competent OLine, but trading him before you pay him and drafting a rookie in a very deep RB class isn’t the craziest idea.

My apprehension is also the ROI. I’m not sure what he’d bring back draft capital wise, but I’m not sure we’d get even a day two pick.

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Well, according to some, K9 basically sucks, doesn't run hard etc. While Charbs is the next Derrick Henry after a few good games.

/sarcasm

 

[toffee]

We don't have many 'expendable' players with trade value, K9, Woolen, ummm, Howell, and who else?

 

[Rat]

None of our RBs would get better than a fourth rounder in a trade, if even that, meaning we'd be lucky if including them in a trade would move us more than two spots.

EDIT: oh, didn't notice who started the thread. I assume this is all supposed to be passive aggressive or weirdly sarcastic or who the hell knows. I'm sure it's not a serious thread regardless.

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Time killer before tomorrow. Gotta' talk about something. The silly season.
Still time to fleece Pete. He was dumb enough to give us a 3rd for an average QB

 

[sutz]

Have heard rumors about that, but have also been hearing that moving around in the top of the first might be really difficult this year just because of how the draft is playing out. The teams with needs vs the players available don't really seem to stack up for a lot of early movement. Which also plays out that the Seahawks might not be able to move back either. They may be stuck at #18 and will have to make a pick there.

With his injury history, I doubt K9 would be enough to move us up that far anyway. We'd have to sweeten the pot a bit. JS likes having a lot of picks in the mid rounds so I think he might be pretty happy with what we have.

 

[Wsumatt1982]

I'd be willing to bet trading K9 let alone any RB this year, with this class has a 0% possibility. If I could go lower than that, I would.

 

[GetNjigbaWithIt]

Not sure about trading, but there's one prospect that I would love to see Seattle add to the RB room, and it's this guy...

 

[OneLofaTatupu]

None of our RBs would get better than a fourth rounder in a trade, if even that, meaning we'd be lucky if including them in a trade would move us more than two spots.

EDIT: oh, didn't notice who started the thread. I assume this is all supposed to be passive aggressive or weirdly sarcastic or who the hell knows. I'm sure it's not a serious thread regardless.

The term is sarcotic