kearly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,974
- Reaction score
- 0
Coleman left the game with a pretty bad looking hamstring injury (he could barely walk) and did not return. Hamstring injuries are notorious for not healing quickly. If Coleman ends up being sidelined for 4-6 weeks, what should Seattle do? I think the obvious thing would be to bring back Mike Rob, but if they did, where does the roster spot come from and what happens to Coleman? Usually guys don't get IR'd for hamstring injuries this early in the season.
One suggestion I heard that I think is pretty clever- cut Coleman. If an injury settlement comes into play, then pay it. IMO, it beats using the IR as it gives Seattle a chance to get Coleman back later if needed. Remember too that interest for FBs around the league is extremely low. If Mike Rob can't find a team in FA, then I imagine gimpy Coleman would be more than safe.
Or, you know, they could just play the next few weeks with TE Davis at FB, and it wouldn't even be the dumbest roster decision we've seen the Seahawks make this year. So who knows. It definitely makes for an interesting situation though. Our lack of a real fullback made parts of the Cardinals game more limited and suspenseful than they'd normally be.
FWIW, I thought Coleman actually had his best game by far as a Seahawk before his injury. Figures. So this isn't an anti-Coleman thing. It's about how the team can potentially work around a big problem that was thrown in their laps tonight.
One suggestion I heard that I think is pretty clever- cut Coleman. If an injury settlement comes into play, then pay it. IMO, it beats using the IR as it gives Seattle a chance to get Coleman back later if needed. Remember too that interest for FBs around the league is extremely low. If Mike Rob can't find a team in FA, then I imagine gimpy Coleman would be more than safe.
Or, you know, they could just play the next few weeks with TE Davis at FB, and it wouldn't even be the dumbest roster decision we've seen the Seahawks make this year. So who knows. It definitely makes for an interesting situation though. Our lack of a real fullback made parts of the Cardinals game more limited and suspenseful than they'd normally be.
FWIW, I thought Coleman actually had his best game by far as a Seahawk before his injury. Figures. So this isn't an anti-Coleman thing. It's about how the team can potentially work around a big problem that was thrown in their laps tonight.