First, post was a quick message sent via phone on a 15 minute break, so know I'm on a computer, I would like to add points to my post.
1st of all, here's the post I wrote in the Enemy forum thread:
In other news: the last time the Seahawks allowed an opponent to score over 30 points in the regular season is 29 games strong and dates back to October 3O, 2011. When the Bengals put 34 points on us. This is also the last time we lost by more than 14 points.
Please, note the Seahawks D did allow the Falcons to score 30 points in the playoffs.
The regular season team that has come the closest is the Detroit Lions in 2012. They put up 28 on the Seahawks.
In this regard, if there was ever a team to score 30 on the Seahawks it would be the Colts, in a 10 a.m. start Away game in a domed stadium, nonetheless, f, after a grueling physical battle the week prior that was also an away game(49ers, Redskins, add Texans) against a talented QB (Stafford, Ryan, add Luck) who has a top 10 WR (Calvin Johnson, Julio Jones, add Reggie Wayne) with other WR talent plus Running Games the Seahawks would underestimate.
Recent history says the Seahawks should lose this game and the Colts should score high in the near 30s. However, the Seahawks are older and wiser in 2013, and appears to finally possess a pass-rush rotation that can take over on the road. #TruckingTheBends #BuckingTheTrends
The wish the last part wouldn't have come true with Colts hanging 34 points, plus a loss.
And the Seahawks played very well, especially down 4 of their best players on the O-line:
Pro Bowl LT, Russell Okung (OG, McQuistan)
All-Pro OC, Max Unger (3rd Year, Jean Pierre)
Pro Bowl TE, Zach Miller (Rookie Luke Willson)
6yr RT, Breno Giacomini (Rookie Michael Bowie)
Wilson had over 300 yards of Offense, 2 TDs, and his sole turn-over, an interception came on the Seahawks last play of the game.
Sure he didn't play his best game, but he also wasn't as bad as some people are making it seem, and he played well enough to win.
I'm not happy with this lost, but I definitely felt if the Seahawks were going to lose a game, it would be this one, none of the other teams seem as unpredictable as the Colts game (even though I pretty much predicted the results even if I didn't believe it). But it is just one of those games, where both teams played great enough to win, but in the end the team that caught the most breaks was the one that went home with the win.
Seahawks lost, and their lack of execution when it mattered most, is what killed their momentum. With that said, if there are fans who actually believe the officiating had no effect on the outcome of this game, then they are playing "no excuses" card.
It wasn't even about the results of the penalties but the premise, if you're going to call ticky-tack, bogus penalties for one team but allow the other team to make more egregious penalties of similar ilk. Then that's where the officiating was bad. And its not just the fans who believe this for instance Brock Huard, who has become a smart football analyst, thought the Officiating was horrendous.
Listening to Carroll's, Wilson's, and Tate's Post-Game comments... Carroll and Wilson definitely bit their tongues and put blame on themselves on not executing well when opportunity knocked i.e. making plays on 3rd down, but when Tate came on, he tried hard, as best he could not to call out the refs, even saying he had to watch what he would say to avoid a fine.
This team knows what they did wrong on their part, and this team knows that he got fleeced in key moments by not poor refereeing but totally one-sided biased refereeing. After Tate’s phantom PI, you pretty much saw the Seahawks DBs signal to the refs every time Colts WRs would push off. None as bad as Reggie Wayne? Or DHB pushing off of Sherman, falling to the ground, and then getting the flag after pouting for it. Or Sidney Rice in the RedZone.
These calls mattered, as people have said, as Holmgren said in the past, its hard enough to win on the road as it is, it’s harder to do it vs a good team, and even more difficult when you’re playing against the Zebras as well.
So, what we lost, 28 other teams in the NFL have at least 1 lost. 25 other teams in the NFL have at least 2 losses.
Seahawks are 4-1 through probably the roughest stretch of their season, 3 Road Games, 2 in consecutive weeks, all 10 AM games. And the Seahawks are 4-1. We won we should have lost in Houston, and we lost won we should have won in Indy. The Seahawks are a young team facing a mountain of adversity and are 4-1 in the NFL, and even with the rest of the NFC West all winning today, are still on top of their Division.
I take a look at a lot of people’s comments and its horrendous display of hopelessness and negativity. Yeah, there are plenty of concerns but it’s the 5th week of the Season. Nobody has to be perfect. Especially a young team that’s winning games and playing well despite struggling through injuries and tough scheduling. Some of you guys on here need to take a chill pill, and quick acting like a bunch of emo kids, a lot of people gave me poop when I said Turbin was an average rusher, I mean that thread reached page 3, and 90% of posters called me out, and one loss this place turns upside down.
If you can’t see the sunshine through the tattered umbrella, if you can’t see the Seahawks are still one of the best teams in the NFL, and still have a great chance to go 14-2 or 15-1, and that after the Titans game, every opponent going forward is an NFC team. Then I feel sorry for you.
Again I’m proud of this team, I don’t expect them to win every game, but I did believe it was possible, especially if they came out of Indy with a win.
People can have their opinions, and their gripes, and their issues, you guys are fans after all, but why don’t some of you haters, the ones who are acting like the sky is falling, just pull of your Seahawks jersey you proudly wore in every win, and burn them like the Texans fans did.
Because the Seahawks deserve way better than this pessimistic bullshit that rains down on this board after every loss.