SonicHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2012
- Messages
- 12,805
- Reaction score
- 4,819
This is an awful idea. Lock is not an NFL QB.
I will respectfully disagree with you on Geno. While he is a bit better than I thought he’d be, he isn’t a franchise QB or one you’d give a long term or a 30 million a year contract to, IMHO.Except it's really not. Most of our offensive ineptitude has been at the play calling level, not Geno. Geno has not been great the last two games but he's been mostly not bad either. He's been mediocre, which when added to his very good play the rest of the year, makes focusing on Geno reductive. In fact, if it wasn't for opinions formed before the season started, we'd barely be talking about it.
Further, starting Lock when this team still has a chance to make the playoffs sabotages our relationship with Geno to learn not much about Lock. If we have any plans to bring him back next year, you absolutely do not tell him we're taking away your chance to make the playoffs so we can look at your replacement in case you end up being too expensive.
-
Overall, though, I simply don't understand being so blasé about tanking, even as just a fan. This isn't a particularly great strategy even in the NBA (teams that tank tend to just keep tanking at every set back) and the NBA is a league where one great player can be a huge difference. This is mostly a terrible strategy in the NFL where you typically need not just a good draft but smart, strategic FA acquisitions to turn a season around. There are too many players on a starting roster for one draft to change your fortunes significantly. Even getting the 'best' QB in the draft is simply a gamble.
We tank now we get, what, 3 spots better in the draft on our second first round pick? How many extra wins is that next year? One... maybe? And that's if we don't alienate the entire locker room by giving up on a team that still has hopes for the playoffs.
The NFL is an any given Sunday league. The Seahawks team that showed up during our win streak can play with anyone in the NFL. If you make the playoffs, all bets are off so everyone who says 'I don't want to see this team make the playoffs' I really don't understand.
Agreed. Anyone who supports this team not making the playoffs should be banned..
This team has fallen off as a whole, especially the defense and play in the trenches on both sides of the ball.
Would be nice if people could be banned for such awful takes like advocating benching one of our best players…or…wanting to see this team miss the playoffs for…reasons.
Even more embarrassing to see any support for either idea—.Net has become a cesspool of bad takes.
I dare say we crossed that river when Geno made the Pro Bowl.They won’t but it would be the best thing to do. You need to find out what you have in Lock so if Geno gets too expensive next year.
Being a top 5 QB in completion percentage, passer rating, QBR and making the Pro Bowl is only a 'bit' better than you thought he'd be?I will respectfully disagree with you on Geno. While he is a bit better than I thought he’d be, he isn’t a franchise QB or one you’d give a long term or a 30 million a year contract to, IMHO.
??????? You need to read more about Genoit just dawned on me there is a small chance they bench Geno next week and start Lock.
I'm not saying Geno is the problem. I'm saying Geno needs to adapt. There are teams with far worse O-lines. Geno knows there is no rushing attack, so he needs to adapt for the stacked boxes and throwing more. This falls on Waldron as well. I'll repharse this. Smith and Waldron need to cook up something for the lack of the running game. Our defense played well Saturday until the last KC touchdown. The defense played well enough for Seattle to win that game. Geno looked lost and confused leading to a very lackluster offensive performance against a very lackluster KC defense.Absolute untruth ^, With the falter scheme the Seahawks Defense have employed, they cannot STOP the running attacks, + no REAL running attack of our own = MOST of those 5 Losses.
Defenses know these weaknesses (film) and they also know that if they stymie Blythe & blow up the middle of the Offensive Line, Geno won't have the TIME to get the ball out to his Receivers.....AND NEITHER WOULD LOCK be able to overcome those exact same weaknesses.
Geno IS NOT THE PROBLEM, quite the contrary.
Yes, our offense was lackluster, and Geno had a very middling game (his second in a row), but I do put most of this on the play calling.I'm not saying Geno is the problem. I'm saying Geno needs to adapt. There are teams with far worse O-lines. Geno knows there is no rushing attack, so he needs to adapt for the stacked boxes and throwing more. This falls on Waldron as well. I'll repharse this. Smith and Waldron need to cook up something for the lack of the running game. Our defense played well Saturday until the last KC touchdown. The defense played well enough for Seattle to win that game. Geno looked lost and confused leading to a very lackluster offensive performance against a very lackluster KC defense.
Bingo.Geno is a part of the problem, the defense a bigger part of the problem. It’s not an either or situation, it’s a both thing.