Shocker: Drew Dalman retires

Trackhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
1,798
View attachment 79178

I’m only going this far with this cause you always take it upon yourself to correct everyone’s grammar…. So just saying….

Reply

Team is a bad example as it can be both singular and plural, depending on the context, though it is generally singular.

The team’s bus is correct use of singular possessive, if we are talking about one team and their bus.

The teams’ buses would be correct use of the plural possessive for multiple teams and their buses.

The Chicago Bears is the name of the team, not The Chicago Bear. Bears is, by definition, plural. Thus, the correct possessive would be The Bears’ Bus, or The Bears’ Center, in this case.
 
OP
OP
bileever

bileever

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
3,070
Reaction score
4,398
I read it as the bear’s, as in the team’s center. Which would be the royal BEAR’s possess drew dalman… xept he retired
Yes, I meant the possessive. I was meaning to type Bears' but failed. I could edit it, but it is causing too much fun.
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
7,952
Reaction score
6,222
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
No, your usage was still not correct, lol.
I only want to explain this too you because your a different kinda a guy, I’d rather end this conversation. But for the last interaction ever I will have with you, you called him out for using an apostrophe in a plural situation where it wasn’t required. I pointed out that he was actually using the word bear’s in a possessive manner. And you argued with me that I was wrong and that the bears can’t possess anything? I think was your position, but you are wrong there, it’s very common to refer to a player as belonging to a team. So then comes in the added degree of difficulty which would be the plural possessive situation we have here so the correct way to write it would be the Bears’ qb or bears’s” like @sutz said

It not the grammar that annoys it’s the correcting of people….
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
41,742
Reaction score
4,537
Location
Roy Wa.
Gunslinger uses a knife to cut up peoples grammer, this thread is not as interesting as his temperature on the field thread arguement, that was very good, do better Gunslinger and Honor your Father.
 

ivotuk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
24,125
Reaction score
3,064
Location
North Pole, Alaska
While there are exceptions, using an apostrophe with plural versions of single letters is allowed, but not required. People also often mix up the year thing, when you SHORTEN the years, it becomes '90s, with the apostrophe before and not after, 1990s as in the plural for the time period has no apostrophe, unless you are denoting ownership/possession, in which case you could say something grammatically correct such as "1990's best film was Goodfellas", which is referring to the best film of that single year, while if you were to say "The best film of the 1990s was Goodfellas", you are referring to the entire decade of the 1990s. Uncommon edge cases are hardly something to try and hang your hat on for this.
There went my erection...
 
Top