Some promising news at NT thankfully!

BASF

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
2,412
Location
Tijuana/San Diego
Yeah he’s not much smaller than Young, I just don’t know enough about D line play to know if it’s a hard transition?
Reed has played some nose on lines after we dropped him. It's not like it is a foreign concept to him. As far as transition, NT is an offensive line disrupter more than anything. It is about not letting either the center or guard disengage from you so they can't block the linebackers.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,268
Reaction score
1,651
Reed has played some nose on lines after we dropped him. It's not like it is a foreign concept to him. As far as transition, NT is an offensive line disrupter more than anything. It is about not letting either the center or guard disengage from you so they can't block the linebackers.

Joe Nash comes to mind as an example of an undersized and dynamic attacking style. Disruptive and persistent. Played from snap to whistle. Although, Nash was full time. Where as, we're probably going to see more of a rotation.
 

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
447
Reaction score
440
Joe Nash comes to mind as an example of an undersized and dynamic attacking style. Disruptive and persistent. Played from snap to whistle. Although, Nash was full time. Where as, we're probably going to see more of a rotation.
Joe Nash is one of my all-time favorite Seahawks. An undersized (6' 3"; 275 lbs.) undrafted free agent who initially was an NT and then a DT when Seattle switched back to a 4-3 defense in 1989 (I think?). A member of the Hawks 35th Anniversary team, he was tough as nails and a testament to the value of perseverance and hard work.
 

Kamcussionator

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
436
Reaction score
705
Location
San Diego, CA
Keep in mind that on passing downs we go to our 'NASCAR' personnel. So our NT aren't necessarily 4-down linemen. We may just go with Young and Tuvai until Mone gets healthy, and then just Young and Mone.

Pete has said, "If you can play nose in college, you can play nose in the NFL." Basically implying that it's not a technical position, and Young could definitely play nose. So other than maybe more camp competition we may be fine with what we have.

Also remember that our problems with stopping the run last year were getting the fit(s) right and keeping contain, not that our NT was getting knocked off the ball. NT was one of the few things that WERE working.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,268
Reaction score
1,651
Joe Nash is one of my all-time favorite Seahawks. An undersized (6' 3"; 275 lbs.) undrafted free agent who initially was an NT and then a DT when Seattle switched back to a 4-3 defense in 1989 (I think?). A member of the Hawks 35th Anniversary team, he was tough as nails and a testament to the value of perseverance and hard work.

I think the 275 number was his listed weight toward the end of his career. If I recall correctly, Joseph began his career at a listed weight of 254 pounds as a starter between Jacob Green and Jeff Bryant. A terrific trio. That was an era when NFL linemen added a lot more playing weight. (Triggered by rule changes and changes in rule enforcement).

Tom Catlin was a memorable and the highly successful defensive coordinator of that era. Enjoyed every moment of Catlin's defense.
 

Chawker

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
5,366
Reaction score
1,314
Location
corner of 30th & plum
Who are we kidding here people, Pete doesn't value the NT position, and until he does, we are going struggle against stopping the run. Sure we have better DE's that can play the run, but when its forth and goal in the big game, Petes going to lose every time. I have no faith in our run defense when it counts.
 
Last edited:

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
447
Reaction score
440
I think the 275 number was his listed weight toward the end of his career. If I recall correctly, Joseph began his career at a listed weight of 254 pounds as a starter between Jacob Green and Jeff Bryant. A terrific trio. That was an era when NFL linemen added a lot more playing weight. (Triggered by rule changes and changes in rule enforcement).

Tom Catlin was a memorable and the highly successful defensive coordinator of that era. Enjoyed every moment of Catlin's defense.
I agree. While I agree that the LOB is the best Hawks defense ever, the gap between it and Tom Catlin's 1984 defense is not that big. The 1984 defense was led by its front 3 and back 4. It had 42 sacks in 14 games (2013 LOB had 44 in 16 games) with the front 3 collecting 34 (Jeff Bryant 14, Jacob Green 13, Joe Nash 7). In 14 games it forced 47 fumbles and recovered 25 (2013 LOB 25-8 in 16 games), had 38 interceptions (2013 LOB had 28), and returned 7 for touchdowns. They returned 4 interceptions for touchdowns in one game (against the Chiefs) and set the NFL record for most interception return yards in a single game with 325. Kenny Easley was named the 1984 defensive player of the year. Had Curt Warner not torn his ACL in the season opener that year I truly believe the 1984 Hawks could have made it to the Super Bowl.

Again, the LOB did it better for longer, but the 1984 defense is significantly underrated and was a blast to watch.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,994
Reaction score
1,685
Location
Sammamish, WA
I think the 275 number was his listed weight toward the end of his career. If I recall correctly, Joseph began his career at a listed weight of 254 pounds as a starter between Jacob Green and Jeff Bryant. A terrific trio. That was an era when NFL linemen added a lot more playing weight. (Triggered by rule changes and changes in rule enforcement).

Tom Catlin was a memorable and the highly successful defensive coordinator of that era. Enjoyed every moment of Catlin's defense.
Agree. Both Nash and Catlin are very underrated. Rusty Tillman was the ST coach during that period too.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,994
Reaction score
1,685
Location
Sammamish, WA
I agree. While I agree that the LOB is the best Hawks defense ever, the gap between it and Tom Catlin's 1984 defense is not that big. The 1984 defense was led by its front 3 and back 4. It had 42 sacks in 14 games (2013 LOB had 44 in 16 games) with the front 3 collecting 34 (Jeff Bryant 14, Jacob Green 13, Joe Nash 7). In 14 games it forced 47 fumbles and recovered 25 (2013 LOB 25-8 in 16 games), had 38 interceptions (2013 LOB had 28), and returned 7 for touchdowns. They returned 4 interceptions for touchdowns in one game (against the Chiefs) and set the NFL record for most interception return yards in a single game with 325. Kenny Easley was named the 1984 defensive player of the year. Had Curt Warner not torn his ACL in the season opener that year I truly believe the 1984 Hawks could have made it to the Super Bowl.

Again, the LOB did it better for longer, but the 1984 defense is significantly underrated and was a blast to watch.
Great post. I was about to add that they were a Curt Warner knee away from getting to the SB. That 1984 defense was superb. That probably would have gone down as the best defense of the decade hadn't it been for the 1985 Bears. The Seahawks just struggled to piece together a consistent run game that season after Warner's injury.
 

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
8,998
Reaction score
1,669
Location
Eastern Washington
Joe Nash comes to mind as an example of an undersized and dynamic attacking style. Disruptive and persistent. Played from snap to whistle. Although, Nash was full time. Where as, we're probably going to see more of a rotation.
He wasn't undersized at the time. We're used to thinking in terms of 300+ pound linemen. Back then, 300# linemen were rare.

Chicago D-lineman William Perry was nicknamed the Refrigerator because his size was so unusually large for the time. Nowadays, he'd be just average.
 

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
447
Reaction score
440
I agree. While I agree that the LOB is the best Hawks defense ever, the gap between it and Tom Catlin's 1984 defense is not that big. The 1984 defense was led by its front 3 and back 4. It had 42 sacks in 14 games (2013 LOB had 44 in 16 games) with the front 3 collecting 34 (Jeff Bryant 14, Jacob Green 13, Joe Nash 7). In 14 games it forced 47 fumbles and recovered 25 (2013 LOB 25-8 in 16 games), had 38 interceptions (2013 LOB had 28), and returned 7 for touchdowns. They returned 4 interceptions for touchdowns in one game (against the Chiefs) and set the NFL record for most interception return yards in a single game with 325. Kenny Easley was named the 1984 defensive player of the year. Had Curt Warner not torn his ACL in the season opener that year I truly believe the 1984 Hawks could have made it to the Super Bowl.

Again, the LOB did it better for longer, but the 1984 defense is significantly underrated and was a blast to watch.
I need to correct a mistake in the above post. 1984 was a sixteen game season, not a fourteen game season. The NFL switched from 14 to 16 games in 1978. My mistake.
 

Pandion Haliaetus

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
838
Just for clarification you guys know Young came into the camps/activities at like 320, right? And someone here after the draft noted he played for Miss St. at around 318. He’s not 330+ yet but he’s also not going to be a 300 pound NT either. So it’s funny to me people are continually referring to him as too small.
 

Frozenropers

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
977
Reaction score
140
Location
Seattle, WA
Just for clarification you guys know Young came into the camps/activities at like 320, right? And someone here after the draft noted he played for Miss St. at around 318. He’s not 330+ yet but he’s also not going to be a 300 pound NT either. So it’s funny to me people are continually referring to him as too small.
I’m not concerned about Young’s size….just his inexperience and lack of depth behind him. 😁
 

Hawkinaz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
1,459
Reaction score
992
Location
Henry County, Virginia
Yeah he’s not much smaller than Young, I just don’t know enough about D line play to know if it’s a hard transition?
Not really a lot will depend on if the Hawks will want the NT to be a read/react or a penetrator using stunts

A possibility is the Seahawks will have a game plan of getting to and playing with a lead which they will be more in nickel and cover 3 and not needing a run stuffer
 

HawaiiD

Active member
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
308
Reaction score
48
Joe Nash comes to mind as an example of an undersized and dynamic attacking style. Disruptive and persistent. Played from snap to whistle. Although, Nash was full time. Where as, we're probably going to see more of a rotation.
Jacob Green,Joe Nash,Jeff Bryant,Manu Tuiasosopo. Was a very underrated but potent 4-3 d line. One of the best the Seahawks ever had imo.
 

Mad Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
2,493
Reaction score
637
Who are we kidding here people, Pete doesn't value the NT position, and until he does, we are going struggle against stopping the run. Sure we have better DE's that can play the run, but when its forth and goal in the big game, Petes going to lose every time. I have no faith in our run defense when it counts.

Pete’s teams were always effective against the run until the last 3 years. And he’s never valued run stuffing interior linemen. No team does. The only interior guys that get paid are the Donald/Watt guys.

Stopping the run has little to do with your NT and a whole lot to do with your run fits and setting edges.
 
Top