McGruff
Well-known member
xray":36ex51on said:this is Wilson's offense..deal with it...Schotty has a head set for looks .
What if it wasnt working?
Whose offense would it be then?
xray":36ex51on said:this is Wilson's offense..deal with it...Schotty has a head set for looks .
Tical21":2k6a3qi4 said:In games where Russ has thrown 30+ times, our record is abysmal, and his efficiency is significantly lower than games where he throws less. I’m pretty content with being 4-1 and having a QB that is a MVP favorite.
John63":2wvwkpp3 said:Tical21":2wvwkpp3 said:In games where Russ has thrown 30+ times, our record is abysmal, and his efficiency is significantly lower than games where he throws less. I’m pretty content with being 4-1 and having a QB that is a MVP favorite.
Half the story as usual, we also did not have a system built for that and we do now. Example this year has 2 games of 30+, we are 1-1 however Wilaon has 5 tds, 0 int, 74% Comp and 118 qb rating. So as I stated we did not have the players needed on the past for throwing 30+ but we do now, when needed.
WilsonsMcGruff":2b7g2gfl said:xray":2b7g2gfl said:this is Wilson's offense..deal with it...Schotty has a head set for looks .
What if it wasnt working?
Whose offense would it be then?
ttown0026":2ujq1hs0 said:The play calling has been so much better this year. I feel like the Hawks are way less predictable. They are adding in play-action on first down more than they have in the past. Hopefully play-action and quick passes are here to stay.
Fade":1czs1nwf said:Pete still has a vice grip on what they are doing. I wish Pete would butt out and go worry about his defense, that is the side of the ball that needs more coaching help. I think Schotty in cooperation with Russ would be even better given total freedom.
But hey, beggars can't be choosers. The offense is doing great things as is. Though believe it or not it would get better if adjusted to 30-35 throws a game, featuring heavy playaction. I think anymore than that is the tipping point where it starts to get into diminishing returns, and It starts to become detrimental. Pete seems to want to keep it at 20-25. That is leaving too much meat on the bone, and puts too much pressure on an avg defense to hold the opponent down. He doesn't have the LoB anymore. He needs more points.
McGruff":369raau1 said:Yes they are, and they have been since last year.
But it is a whole another level.
I do resent the continued implication that when it goes well, its Russ calling the plays. And when it doesnt, its Schottys fault.
Tical21":1y9309kb said:In games where Russ has thrown 30+ times, our record is abysmal, and his efficiency is significantly lower than games where he throws less. I’m pretty content with being 4-1 and having a QB that is a MVP favorite.
Fade":1t9hqycj said:Tical21":1t9hqycj said:In games where Russ has thrown 30+ times, our record is abysmal, and his efficiency is significantly lower than games where he throws less. I’m pretty content with being 4-1 and having a QB that is a MVP favorite.
You're confusing causation with correlation.
Wilson isn't allowed to throw 30+ times unless they are getting their asses kicked. So of course the record isn't going to look good. He usually tears it up regardless and brings the team back from whatever deficit to boot.
I am proposing a more balanced attack that would still be run heavy, featuring heavy playaction where they throw it about 5-10 times more a game. A typical Seahawks game they have Wilson throwing about 25 times. They bump that number to 32 throws a game, they would score somewhere from 3 (floor) to maybe as much as 7 (ceiling) more points per game on avg. as efficient as Wilson is.
Again I think once you hit the 35 throw mark it would level off drastically and be diminishingreturnsville in terms of winning football games. Pete is leaving a lot of meat on the bone, for dogma reasons. He coaches his teams the pretty much the same way regardless of his personnel. He has his beliefs and he is sticking to them, no matter how what.
Whether he has the LoB or the LoL.
McGruff":ppxtermk said:Fade":ppxtermk said:Tical21":ppxtermk said:In games where Russ has thrown 30+ times, our record is abysmal, and his efficiency is significantly lower than games where he throws less. I’m pretty content with being 4-1 and having a QB that is a MVP favorite.
You're confusing causation with correlation.
Wilson isn't allowed to throw 30+ times unless they are getting their asses kicked. So of course the record isn't going to look good. He usually tears it up regardless and brings the team back from whatever deficit to boot.
I am proposing a more balanced attack that would still be run heavy, featuring heavy playaction where they throw it about 5-10 times more a game. A typical Seahawks game they have Wilson throwing about 25 times. They bump that number to 32 throws a game, they would score somewhere from 3 (floor) to maybe as much as 7 (ceiling) more points per game on avg. as efficient as Wilson is.
Again I think once you hit the 35 throw mark it would level off drastically and be diminishingreturnsville in terms of winning football games. Pete is leaving a lot of meat on the bone, for dogma reasons. He coaches his teams the pretty much the same way regardless of his personnel. He has his beliefs and he is sticking to them, no matter how what.
Whether he has the LoB or the LoL.
What would you say is our best offensive game so far this year?
McGruff":3s4pi4rx said:Yeah, grading teams for scheme style is a non starter.
All that matters is production. Style points dont win games.
McGruff":qitspq01 said:20 runs and 12 passes by my head count in the first half of the Rams game.
McGruff":14220cqz said:17 passes and 11 runs.
McGruff":2c1bb0uw said:DVOA is trash IMO for individual plays and games.
Maybe over the course of a season it means something, but football is far to complex a game for it to be isolated minutely.
I've long been of the opinion that when you break down the results that matter, which is wins and losses, you will find that neither run first nor pass first makes much of a difference.
It's not what you do. It's how you do what you do.