Seahawks 1st quarter, 4th quarter .PPG NFL Team Rankings

Mizak

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
2,815
Reaction score
1,007
Starting off with 2012 cuz thats when Russ Magic happened:

Seahawks 1st quarter NFL Rankings:
2012: 15th, 5.4 ppg
2013: 21st, 4.2 ppg
2014: 18th, 4.1 ppg
2015: 16th, 4.3 ppg
2016: 19th, 4.1 ppg
2017: 20th, 3.5 ppg
2018: 18th, 4.6 ppg
2019: 17th, 4.6 ppg
2020: 16th, 5.1 ppg
2021: 11th, 4.8 ppg

Seahawks 4th quarter NFL Rankings:
2012: 10th, 7.3 ppg
2013: 10th, 7.3 ppg
2014: 4th, 8.6 ppg
2015: 12th, 7.1 ppg
2016: 12th, 6.9 ppg
2017: 2nd, 8.9 ppg
2018: 2nd, 9.2 ppg
2019: 7th, 7.3 ppg
2020: 11th, 7.9 ppg
2021: 23rd, 5.7 ppg

What I got from this: why even try to score in the 1st quarter? Surprise, surprise, wait until 4th quarter to score but it seems Waldron‘s offensive play calling became predictable in the 4th quarter and the offense became stagnant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
The first-quarter numbers tell you it has nothing to do with the QB and OC. They are the same no matter who is calling or running the plays.
 

BASF

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,964
Reaction score
2,712
Location
Tijuana/San Diego
The first-quarter numbers tell you it has nothing to do with the QB and OC. They are the same no matter who is calling or running the plays.
Same QB for all but three games, but no matter who is running the plays? Wow
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
Same QB for all but three games, but no matter who is running the plays? Wow
This chart only looks at points scored per first quarter and the deviation is really close. The swing is only 1.9 from the highest and lowest numbers. If you had Geno Smith as your QB every year you could average 4.2 ppg per 1st quarter and lose 100 more games.
 

JayhawkMike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,132
Interesting numbers. I wonder what the league average and the league leader #s are for comparison.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1,234
Location
Bournemouth, UK
The Seahawks lost the time of possession battle in 2021. Their defense was gassed in the 4th quarter and couldn't get off the field. The QB and RB were also playing hurt. Not a surprise to see the 2021 offense struggling to score points late in games. Waldron is still pretty much an unknown/yet to be determined factor.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
Starting off with 2012 cuz thats when Russ Magic happened:

Seahawks 1st quarter NFL Rankings:
2012: 15th, 5.4 ppg
2013: 21st, 4.2 ppg
2014: 18th, 4.1 ppg
2015: 16th, 4.3 ppg
2016: 19th, 4.1 ppg
2017: 20th, 3.5 ppg
2018: 18th, 4.6 ppg
2019: 17th, 4.6 ppg
2020: 16th, 5.1 ppg
2021: 11th, 4.8 ppg

Seahawks 4th quarter NFL Rankings:
2012: 10th, 7.3 ppg
2013: 10th, 7.3 ppg
2014: 4th, 8.6 ppg
2015: 12th, 7.1 ppg
2016: 12th, 6.9 ppg
2017: 2nd, 8.9 ppg
2018: 2nd, 9.2 ppg
2019: 7th, 7.3 ppg
2020: 11th, 7.9 ppg
2021: 23rd, 5.7 ppg

What I got from this: why even try to score in the 1st quarter? Surprise, surprise, wait until 4th quarter to score but it seems Waldron‘s offensive play calling became predictable in the 4th quarter and the offense became stagnant.
That's PC remember you cant win in the 1st, the 2nd or the 3rd but you can in the 4th
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
The Seahawks lost the time of possession battle in 2021. Their defense was gassed in the 4th quarter and couldn't get off the field. The QB and RB were also playing hurt. Not a surprise to see the 2021 offense struggling to score points late in games. Waldron is still pretty much an unknown/yet to be determined factor.
I agree Waldron is an unknown and then add it we never know when PC will intervene and revert to same old same old.
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
1,955
Location
Kalispell, MT
That's PC remember you cant win in the 1st, the 2nd or the 3rd but you can in the 4th
1st play of the second half of Super Bowl XLVIII is the best example I can think of to argue against this PC BS.

Whatever wind was left in Denver's sails completely departed when Harvin gashed them for another 7 points on that run back.

It was just coasting, and going through the motions after that. Short of us pulling all our starters, nothing was getting them back into that game.
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
1,955
Location
Kalispell, MT
While not a perfect example, given Waldron's varied role within the organization, it is still interesting to see that, during his time there, the Rams looked like this...

Ram's 1st quarter NFL rankings:
2017: 1st - 7 ppg - Tight ends coach
2018: 4th - 5.7 ppg - Passing game coordinator
2019: 27th - 3.3 ppg - Passing game coordinator & QB coach
2020: 18th - 4.8 ppg - Passing game coordinator

Ram's 4th quarter NFL rankings:
2017: 26th - 4.8 ppg
2018: 17th - 6.8 ppg
2019: 13th - 6.5 ppg
2020: 25th - 6.3 ppg
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,033
Reaction score
1,208
It would be interesting to see these #s by halves instead of quarters.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
1st play of the second half of Super Bowl XLVIII is the best example I can think of to argue against this PC BS.

Whatever wind was left in Denver's sails completely departed when Harvin gashed them for another 7 points on that run back.

It was just coasting, and going through the motions after that. Short of us pulling all our starters, nothing was getting them back into that game.
Except if you remember it took Lynch asking if we could keep scoring. Also not sure how a run on special teams proves anything about the offense.and PCs well documented mantra of not winning in the QST. 2nd. 3rd but in the 4th which is substantiated by the OP.
 

rcaido

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
2,372
Reaction score
633
Im also going to say the refs were particularly very bad in the 4th quarter for us last season both on offensive & defensive penalties.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,033
Reaction score
1,208
I do remember that in one of those years (2017?) we set a record for not scoring TDs in the 1st halves in consecutive games. So these #s are actually not as bad one would expect. We were historically inept at 1st half scoring that year (I think the year before I stopped watching 1st halves of games...that was the year with the GB season opener in Seattle that we lost)
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
1,955
Location
Kalispell, MT
Except if you remember it took Lynch asking if we could keep scoring. Also not sure how a run on special teams proves anything about the offense.and PCs well documented mantra of not winning in the QST. 2nd. 3rd but in the 4th which is substantiated by the OP.
Literally nothing you said addresses what I posted.

I wasn't talking about the offense, and I wasn't arguing that it is BS to claim that Pete Carroll has that mantra. I was saying that the mantra itself is BS, and gave a perfect example of when the game was won prior to the 4th quarter.

When Denver came out of the half time locker room, they were fired up. They looked re-energized. They looked like they still believed they could come back, and ride the "greatest offense of all time" to a come from behind win.

After Harvin crosses the goal line, nobody on their sideline believed they could do it anymore. Manning looked crestfallen. Fox looked, well much like he always looked, puzzled and lost. The team looked absolutely dejected. Seattle looked like they knew they could coast to a win. Lynch was even wondering if they were allowed to score more, unnecessary points.

If ever there was a game that the Seahawks had completely in hand before the 4th quarter, this was it.

You can win in other quarters than the 4th.
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
1,955
Location
Kalispell, MT
It would be interesting to see these #s by halves instead of quarters.
Year. 1st half 2nd half
2012 9th/12.9 ppg 11th/ 12.5 ppg
2013 10th/12.7 ppg 14th/ 12.7 ppg
2014 15th/11 ppg 8th/ 13.5 ppg
2015 13th/ 11.4 ppg 2nd/ 14 ppg
2016 10th/ 12.4 ppg 24th/ 9.6 ppg
2017 29th/ 7.8 ppg 1st / 15.1 ppg
2018 13th/ 12.5 ppg 4th/ 13.9 ppg
2019 16th/ 11.1 ppg 8th/ 13.1 ppg
2020 15th/ 13.2 ppg 2nd/ 15 ppg
2021 9th/ 12.9 ppg 22nd/10.3ppg

Apologies for the formatting. I'm on my phone.

The only thing I glean from it is that when we have a season with succesful first halves, we throttle back in the second, and when we have seasons with dismal 1st halves, we seem to turn up the juice in the second half, but overall we tend to have balanced, middle of the road, scoring.
 
Top