Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
Just wondering the logic in Pete's thinking....if there is any. The offense pulled the weight from the historically bad first half defense....literally! Then the 2nd half we slumped on offense and the D stepped up on most statistics other than turnovers.
So in this disappointing ending, it is Schottenheimer taking the axe yet Norton's side of the ball was obviously far worse half the year?
Pete and Schotty were lockstep in philosophy going in, and thru 2 seasons now he suddenly is not? I don't care much as the offense will be Pete's no matter who moves in....just curious if others agree this appears an easy scapegoat to a season of 2 seasons on offense and defense?
I will also point out that since the 2014 SB loss we are averaging 6 first half points in 8 playoff games, and those span 2 coordinators leaving Pete Carroll as the ONLY coaching common denominator!
So in this disappointing ending, it is Schottenheimer taking the axe yet Norton's side of the ball was obviously far worse half the year?
Pete and Schotty were lockstep in philosophy going in, and thru 2 seasons now he suddenly is not? I don't care much as the offense will be Pete's no matter who moves in....just curious if others agree this appears an easy scapegoat to a season of 2 seasons on offense and defense?
I will also point out that since the 2014 SB loss we are averaging 6 first half points in 8 playoff games, and those span 2 coordinators leaving Pete Carroll as the ONLY coaching common denominator!