Sam Bradford's #s vs. NFC West QBs (so far)

[Dtowers]

Not going to read the thread because this dbag is more passive aggressive than my neighbor's wife when she is on the rag but has anybody brought up the fact that Bradford is trash? Or that he has needed a significant of garbage time to put up a good portion of his stats? LMFAO is this guy related to Sam or something? I am just going to start calling Avenger Mr. Bradford Sr. from now on.

 

[seahawk12thman]

Maybe I am a little off base here but if he wants to add his opinion to this board about an opposing player in the NFL section, I don't see the problem? The one thing I like about this board is the humanity (maybe theatrical here) but he at least attempts to facilitate discussion even if he always posts about the Rams. I found humor in many of the posts here but the personal attacks are childish. It is still early in the season and the book hasn't been written on the NFC West just yet. As long as he doesn't troll the Seahawk articles, I suggest we are more hospitable to our guest. Commence bashing!! :3-1:

 

[Sac]

What personal attacks?

 

[AvengerRam]

Maybe I am a little off base here but if he wants to add his opinion to this board about an opposing player in the NFL section, I don't see the problem? The one thing I like about this board is the humanity (maybe theatrical here) but he at least attempts to facilitate discussion even if he always posts about the Rams. I found humor in many of the posts here but the personal attacks are childish. It is still early in the season and the book hasn't been written on the NFC West just yet. As long as he doesn't troll the Seahawk articles, I suggest we are more hospitable to our guest. Commence bashing!! :3-1:

Thanks.

I get the feeling that there are some people here who don't recognize, or don't wish to recognize, the difference between the NFL board and the Smack Shack.

 

[seahawk12thman]

AvengerRam's posts are like Bradford.

I am guessing this is a little personal eh? :thfight7:

The Rams have struggled for quite some time ann given their improvment, he might just be excited that his team is competitive (even though they are struggling). I might be the same way if the Hawks were bad for the last 8 or 9 years. Bash the Rams all you want, I would just keep the personal comments more positive in nature.

 

[Sac]

I attacked the post, not the poster.

 

[AvengerRam]

I attacked the post, not the poster.

No, actually you did neither.

You just repeated the same nonsense Bradford insult over and over.

That's not a response to anything. Its just noise.

 

[Dtowers]

Surprised a Rams fan would know what noise sounds like since that stadium is so quiet. LOL Sam "The Trash" Bagford.

 

[cdallan]

I'm going to try to drag this back to the point. Bradford is - currently - average. Maybe 14 to 17 in the list of NFL QBs? Anybody know where he is on DYAR? Anyhoo, that means maybe half of the teams in the NFL would start him if this is a correct place to put him. Obviously a few of the teams with worse QBs have young QBs they are going to roll with. Wouldn't somebody like Cleveland pay him $7m or $8m a year for 3 years without blinking? Or the Bucs?

 

[seahawk12thman]

I attacked the post, not the poster.

No, actually you did neither.

You just repeated the same nonsense Bradford insult over and over.

That's not a response to anything. Its just noise.

Do you think Bradford is a franchise quarterback?

 

[Dtowers]

seahawk12thman you are killing me with that attachment knock it off.

 

[AvengerRam]

I'm going to try to drag this back to the point. Bradford is - currently - average. Maybe 14 to 17 in the list of NFL QBs? Anybody know where he is on DYAR? Anyhoo, that means maybe half of the teams in the NFL would start him if this is a correct place to put him. Obviously a few of the teams with worse QBs have young QBs they are going to roll with. Wouldn't somebody like Cleveland pay him $7m or $8m a year for 3 years without blinking? Or the Bucs?

Right now, he's well above average in passer rating, TDs and interceptions. Discount those stats if you wish, but those are the facts.

 

[AvengerRam]

I attacked the post, not the poster.

No, actually you did neither.

You just repeated the same nonsense Bradford insult over and over.

That's not a response to anything. Its just noise.

Do you think Bradford is a franchise quarterback?

Since that term does not have an official definition, let me give you mine. To me, a franchise QB is a one who you consider to be your starter for the foreseeable future. In the context of the Rams' current situation, that means that I would not draft a QB with one (or a package of both) of the Rams two first round picks in 2014.

Based upon that definition, the answer to your question is yes.

 

[Dtowers]

He is also well above average at garbage time accumulation of stats.

Haha Trash Bagford as a franchise QB. Right. Just wait until they draft a QB next year.

 

[AvengerRam]

He is also well above average at garbage time accumulation of stats.

No, he's not.

His best four games were a game won in the last minute on a FG (no garbage time), two games that were within 7 points in the 4th Quarter (no garbage time), and a game (two days ago) in which he didn't throw a single pass (didn't need to) in the last 20:20 of game time (didn't accumulate ANY stats during garbage time).

His worst stats came in the two games in which there was significant "garbage time."

But, hey... don't let the facts get in the way of your argument.

 

[seahawk12thman]

seahawk12thman you are killing me with that attachment knock it off.

LOL what's wrong with it?

 

[Sarlacc83]

He is also well above average at garbage time accumulation of stats.

No, he's not.

His best four games were a game won in the last minute on a FG (no garbage time), two games that were within 7 points in the 4th Quarter (no garbage time), and a game (two days ago) in which he didn't throw a single pass (didn't need to) in the last 20:20 of game time (didn't accumulate ANY stats during garbage time).

His worst stats came in the two games in which there was significant "garbage time."

But, hey... don't let the facts get in the way of your argument.

Those games were against the Jaguars (wow) and the Cardinals. The other games, the Rams either got blown out of the building or lost to a 1-4 team.

Man, it's almost like Bradford only plays well half the time and the rest he accumulates garbage stats.

 

[AvengerRam]

He is also well above average at garbage time accumulation of stats.

No, he's not.

His best four games were a game won in the last minute on a FG (no garbage time), two games that were within 7 points in the 4th Quarter (no garbage time), and a game (two days ago) in which he didn't throw a single pass (didn't need to) in the last 20:20 of game time (didn't accumulate ANY stats during garbage time).

His worst stats came in the two games in which there was significant "garbage time."

But, hey... don't let the facts get in the way of your argument.

Those games were against the Jaguars (wow) and the Cardinals. The other games, the Rams either got blown out of the building or lost to a 1-4 team.

Man, it's almost like Bradford only plays well half the time and the rest he accumulates garbage stats.

No, its not like that at all.

But go ahead and keep repeating it. I'm sure many of the kiddies around here will believe you.

 

[Dtowers]

Thank you Sarlacc for saving me a long winded reply. Anybody that thinks Trash Bagford is a franchise QB can't be taken seriously.

 

[Sac]

Bradford is trash.