Sam Bradford's #s vs. NFC West QBs (so far)

[Sac]

Bradford is trash.

 

[AvengerRam]

Passer Rating: 90.7 (2nd)
Yards:: 1,432 (2nd)
Yards/Attempt: 6.2 (4th)
TD passes: 13 (1st)
Interceptions (fewest): 3 (1st)
Completion %: 59.5 (2nd)

Now, before anyone misconstrues the purpose of this post...I am here because my team won and I want to shit talk your QB but don't have the guts to just come out and say it.

You had a typo.

Are you going to post that nonsense every time I happen to post after a Rams win? (I've posted after their losses too, but I guess I didn't notice that).

I'm going to post it every time you show up and troll our forum.

So, according to you, any thing an opposing team's fan posts is "trolling."

 

[Sac]

Bradford is trash.

 

[AbsolutNET]

So, according to you, any thing an opposing team's fan posts is "trolling."

It's plainly obvious I didn't say that. I am pointing you out specifically as a troll.

 

[AvengerRam]

But you did talk shit, just in your passive aggressive way. "Der, bradford would be 5-1 if he played for the Hawks" or some passive aggressive version of the same thing. Bradford would be in traction if he played for the Hawks right now.

That's not talking shit.

The Seahawks' biggest assets are their defense and their running game. That's what allows them to have a QB with the fewest pass attempts/game of any starting QB in the NFL. You guys always seem to overlook that fact and its significance.

So, yes... if Sam Bradford played with a RB producing like Lynch and a defense that perfomed like the Seahawks current D, I have no doubt in my mind that he could lead them into the playoffs.

You guys are so defensive that... despite the fact that I'm COMPLIMENTING your team, all you see is an insult towards Wilson.

 

[Sac]

despite the fact that I'm COMPLIMENTING your team, all you see is an insult towards Wilson.

That's because...

















Bradford is trash.

 

[Throwdown]

Sac wins the thread

 

[Scottemojo]

But you did talk shit, just in your passive aggressive way. "Der, bradford would be 5-1 if he played for the Hawks" or some passive aggressive version of the same thing. Bradford would be in traction if he played for the Hawks right now.

That's not talking shit.

The Seahawks' biggest assets are their defense and their running game. That's what allows them to have a QB with the fewest pass attempts/game of any starting QB in the NFL. You guys always seem to overlook that fact and its significance.

So, yes... if Sam Bradford played with a RB producing like Lynch and a defense that perfomed like the Seahawks current D, I have no doubt in my mind that he could lead them into the playoffs.

You guys are so defensive that... despite the fact that I'm COMPLIMENTING your team, all you see is an insult towards Wilson.

And where is Wilson in running yards and first downs run for?
Of course we are defensive, you are passive aggressive. I covered that already.

 

[AvengerRam]

despite the fact that I'm COMPLIMENTING your team, all you see is an insult towards Wilson.

That's because...


Bradford is trash.

You may want to get that Tourette syndrome looked at.

 

[Sarlacc83]

Look at the YPA. Awful.

Rams:

Total offense: 30th

PPG: 15th

What were you saying again?

Given that the fruit is commonly grown in the Pacific Northwest, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you're a cherrypicker.

No cherry picking is trying to use stats that don't tell the whole story. The above rounds out the omitted statistics. If teams feared Bradford, even slightly, your RBs probably wouldn't suck as much as they do.

SacHawk is right. Bradford is trash.

 

[Sac]

despite the fact that I'm COMPLIMENTING your team, all you see is an insult towards Wilson.

That's because...


Bradford is trash.

You may want to get that Tourette syndrome looked at.

Sac wins the thread

Do you know why? Yeah...you know why.

 

[AvengerRam]

But you did talk shit, just in your passive aggressive way. "Der, bradford would be 5-1 if he played for the Hawks" or some passive aggressive version of the same thing. Bradford would be in traction if he played for the Hawks right now.

That's not talking shit.

The Seahawks' biggest assets are their defense and their running game. That's what allows them to have a QB with the fewest pass attempts/game of any starting QB in the NFL. You guys always seem to overlook that fact and its significance.

So, yes... if Sam Bradford played with a RB producing like Lynch and a defense that perfomed like the Seahawks current D, I have no doubt in my mind that he could lead them into the playoffs.

You guys are so defensive that... despite the fact that I'm COMPLIMENTING your team, all you see is an insult towards Wilson.

And where is Wilson in running yards and first downs run for?
Of course we are defensive, you are passive aggressive. I covered that already.

Wilson is obviously a much better runner than Bradford.

That said, the production disparity is fairly small. After 6 games, Wilson is averaging 258.0 combined rushing/passing yards per game, while Bradford is averaging 243.7.

So, I guess in your minds the difference between an MVP candidate QB and a mediocre QB is 14 yards (and change) per game.

 

[AvengerRam]

Look at the YPA. Awful.

Rams:

Total offense: 30th

PPG: 15th

What were you saying again?

Given that the fruit is commonly grown in the Pacific Northwest, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you're a cherrypicker.

No cherry picking is trying to use stats that don't tell the whole story. The above rounds out the omitted statistics. If teams feared Bradford, even slightly, your RBs probably wouldn't suck as much as they do.

SacHawk is right. Bradford is trash.

Those are not omitted stats, because they're not QB stats.

 

[Sarlacc83]

Look at the YPA. Awful.

Rams:

Total offense: 30th

PPG: 15th

What were you saying again?

Given that the fruit is commonly grown in the Pacific Northwest, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you're a cherrypicker.

No cherry picking is trying to use stats that don't tell the whole story. The above rounds out the omitted statistics. If teams feared Bradford, even slightly, your RBs probably wouldn't suck as much as they do.

SacHawk is right. Bradford is trash.

Those are not omitted stats, because they're not QB stats.

You are wrong (as usual). Low YPA = check down artists. Check down artists bring defenders closer to the LoS. Congratulations, your QB sucks.

 

[Sac]

Bradford es basura.

 

[AvengerRam]

Thank you all for proving, once again, that a significant number of the Hawks fans on this site are immature, insecure, children who can't handle a completely non-offensive post from another team's fan.

I'm sure you're all proud of yourself for showing the big bad Rams fan that he can't come around here an dare to post facts if they don't fit the Hawks' agenda and narrative.

And, if this is trolling... go ahead and ban me.

 

[DavidSeven]

There are maybe 4-5 other QBs in the entire league that could've been close to as productive/efficient as Wilson has behind our decimated line. Bradford is not one of them. He would've had a separated shoulder by the end of the HOU game.

 

[Sarlacc83]

Thank you all for proving, once again, that a significant number of the Hawks fans see through my crap and are quickly and easily able to correct my misguided notions about my team which results in me throwing a temper-tantrum when I don't get my way.

Fixed.

/doesn't care if it's childish.

 

[Sac]

AvengerRam's posts are like Bradford.

 

[Throwdown]

He mad?