Pandion Haliaetus
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 3,977
- Reaction score
- 994
If you’ve been frustrated with the play and decision-making of Russell Wilson, I did a shoddy analysis comparing Wilson’s first 4 games of 2012 to his first 4 games of 2013.
2012 Opponents: @ARI (L), vs. DAL (W), vs. GB (W), @STL (L), SEAHAWKS 2-2
2013 Opponents: @CAR (W), vs. SF (W), vs. JAX (W), @HOU (W), SEAHAWKS 4-0
I would argue:
@Carolina was a more difficult task than @Arizona. Longer travel, into a harder weather handicap, against a better offense, and a more talented defense with Seahawks out key defensive players plus a few of them playing through nagging injuries.
Vs. San Fran was a more difficult task than Vs. Dallas. One of the most anticipated games of the summer, and a rivalry game, the 49ers were to avenge their 42-13 loss from last year. SFO D > DAL D.
Vs. Jax. Seahawks caught a break with the Jaguars like they simultaneous caught a break in the GB game. Yet, it was still a challenge to compete with a lesser team and play your best football.
@Houston was a more difficult task than @STL. Better team, better fans, scarier offense, more intimidating defense with the Seahawks down 3 starters on the O-line + 10 am start in 95 degrees of Texas heat.
While Wilson was a rookie in 2012, and was building chemistry, he had more veterans surrounding him in 2012 with guys like Michael Robinson, Leon Washington, Frank Omiyale , Mike Person, Anthony McCoy, Braylon Edwards, and Charly Martin being much more experienced than Derrick Coleman, Christine Michael, Michael Bowie, Alvin Bailey, Luke Willson, Jermaine Kearse, and Stephen Williams.
In 2013, teams also have a bead on Wilson, a better understanding of what he can and cannot do, which equates to a more effective game-plan and strategy against him. Seahawks played good defenses in the first 4 games of 2012, but again the defenses front 7 the Seahawks face in 2013 were much scarier. It also didn’t help the Offensive Line hasn’t been 100% with their 3 best players currently out with injuries.
Passing Statistics
2013: 59 Cmp for 96 Att (61.5 Comp%) for 787 Yds, 8.2 Y/A, 13.3 Y/C, 6 TDs, 95.3 QB rating
2012: 60 Cmp for 100 Att (60.0 Comp%) for 594 Yds, 5.9 Y/A, 9.9 Y/C, 4 TDs, 80.1 QB rating
2013: +1.5 Comp %, + 193 Yds, + 2.3 Y/A, + 3.4 Y/C, + 2 TDs, + 15.2 QB rating
Rushing Statistics
2013: 27 Carries for 131 Yards, 4.9 Y/C, 0 TDs
2012: 22 Carries for 80 Yards, 3.6 Y/C, 0 TDs
2013: + 51 Yards, +1.3 Y/C
Negative Statistics
2013: 3 INTs + 2 FL = 5 T.O., 13 Sacks For 84 Yards (6.5 Yards Loss/Sack)
2012: 4 INTS + 1 FL = 5 T.O., 8 Sacks For 71 Yards (8.9 Yards Loss/Sack)
Russell has made about the same number of poor decisions gone bad and like last year with a little help from his WRs. However, it was interesting to see he’s been taking less yardage loss per sack which could mean he’s been more intelligent against the pressure and minimizing his losses (for the most part, he’ll take a monumental loss every now and then).
Comparatively, Wilson is ahead of schedule than where he was last season. We know in Wilson’s last 9 games of the 2012 season, he was statistically one of the best QBs in the NFL. To compare, this is what Wilson’s stat-line would be if you project the rest of his season off his current 2013 stat line:
2013: 236/384, 3148 Yards, 24 TDs, 12 INTs, 108 Carries for 524 Yards, 52 Sacks, 8 Fumbles
2012: 252/393, 3118 Yards, 26 TDs, 10 INTs, 94 Carries for 489 Yards, 33 Sacks, 6 Fumbles
Can Wilson play much better? Certainly, he’s an extraordinary player but he’s also been facing a greater deal of pressure and better teams behind an injury riddled O-line in 2013 than then he was in 2012.
Does he deserve the criticism and doubts? Possibly. However, in my opinion, he does not because despite all his struggles and bone-head mistakes, he’s still on schedule for a similar season statistically to his amazing 2012 run. And we haven’t even gotten to his good stuff yet on a consistent basis. #WaitForItWilson
2012 Opponents: @ARI (L), vs. DAL (W), vs. GB (W), @STL (L), SEAHAWKS 2-2
2013 Opponents: @CAR (W), vs. SF (W), vs. JAX (W), @HOU (W), SEAHAWKS 4-0
I would argue:
@Carolina was a more difficult task than @Arizona. Longer travel, into a harder weather handicap, against a better offense, and a more talented defense with Seahawks out key defensive players plus a few of them playing through nagging injuries.
Vs. San Fran was a more difficult task than Vs. Dallas. One of the most anticipated games of the summer, and a rivalry game, the 49ers were to avenge their 42-13 loss from last year. SFO D > DAL D.
Vs. Jax. Seahawks caught a break with the Jaguars like they simultaneous caught a break in the GB game. Yet, it was still a challenge to compete with a lesser team and play your best football.
@Houston was a more difficult task than @STL. Better team, better fans, scarier offense, more intimidating defense with the Seahawks down 3 starters on the O-line + 10 am start in 95 degrees of Texas heat.
While Wilson was a rookie in 2012, and was building chemistry, he had more veterans surrounding him in 2012 with guys like Michael Robinson, Leon Washington, Frank Omiyale , Mike Person, Anthony McCoy, Braylon Edwards, and Charly Martin being much more experienced than Derrick Coleman, Christine Michael, Michael Bowie, Alvin Bailey, Luke Willson, Jermaine Kearse, and Stephen Williams.
In 2013, teams also have a bead on Wilson, a better understanding of what he can and cannot do, which equates to a more effective game-plan and strategy against him. Seahawks played good defenses in the first 4 games of 2012, but again the defenses front 7 the Seahawks face in 2013 were much scarier. It also didn’t help the Offensive Line hasn’t been 100% with their 3 best players currently out with injuries.
Passing Statistics
2013: 59 Cmp for 96 Att (61.5 Comp%) for 787 Yds, 8.2 Y/A, 13.3 Y/C, 6 TDs, 95.3 QB rating
2012: 60 Cmp for 100 Att (60.0 Comp%) for 594 Yds, 5.9 Y/A, 9.9 Y/C, 4 TDs, 80.1 QB rating
2013: +1.5 Comp %, + 193 Yds, + 2.3 Y/A, + 3.4 Y/C, + 2 TDs, + 15.2 QB rating
Rushing Statistics
2013: 27 Carries for 131 Yards, 4.9 Y/C, 0 TDs
2012: 22 Carries for 80 Yards, 3.6 Y/C, 0 TDs
2013: + 51 Yards, +1.3 Y/C
Negative Statistics
2013: 3 INTs + 2 FL = 5 T.O., 13 Sacks For 84 Yards (6.5 Yards Loss/Sack)
2012: 4 INTS + 1 FL = 5 T.O., 8 Sacks For 71 Yards (8.9 Yards Loss/Sack)
Russell has made about the same number of poor decisions gone bad and like last year with a little help from his WRs. However, it was interesting to see he’s been taking less yardage loss per sack which could mean he’s been more intelligent against the pressure and minimizing his losses (for the most part, he’ll take a monumental loss every now and then).
Comparatively, Wilson is ahead of schedule than where he was last season. We know in Wilson’s last 9 games of the 2012 season, he was statistically one of the best QBs in the NFL. To compare, this is what Wilson’s stat-line would be if you project the rest of his season off his current 2013 stat line:
2013: 236/384, 3148 Yards, 24 TDs, 12 INTs, 108 Carries for 524 Yards, 52 Sacks, 8 Fumbles
2012: 252/393, 3118 Yards, 26 TDs, 10 INTs, 94 Carries for 489 Yards, 33 Sacks, 6 Fumbles
Can Wilson play much better? Certainly, he’s an extraordinary player but he’s also been facing a greater deal of pressure and better teams behind an injury riddled O-line in 2013 than then he was in 2012.
Does he deserve the criticism and doubts? Possibly. However, in my opinion, he does not because despite all his struggles and bone-head mistakes, he’s still on schedule for a similar season statistically to his amazing 2012 run. And we haven’t even gotten to his good stuff yet on a consistent basis. #WaitForItWilson