94Smith":3msroo2a said:The problem with a roster purge is if the Seahawks have a really bad season next year the fan base is going to be out for blood and ownership will be forced into firing Pete and John
No worries .........
Not gonna happen.
94Smith":3msroo2a said:The problem with a roster purge is if the Seahawks have a really bad season next year the fan base is going to be out for blood and ownership will be forced into firing Pete and John
Jville":1lp2pzpe said:94Smith":1lp2pzpe said:The problem with a roster purge is if the Seahawks have a really bad season next year the fan base is going to be out for blood and ownership will be forced into firing Pete and John
No worries .........
Not gonna happen.
LOLOL Ya, okay, they've emptied the clip of spent, misfired & injury prone rounds, It's time for a 'Reloading'...ALL teams are doing this EVERY YEAR to one degree or another...The Rams "Reloaded'' their Quarterback position by bringing in Stafford and a couple of other Defenders.GemCity":3t5lfxay said:Fans are playing chess. PC & JS know damn well this is a rebuild. You can’t just come out and say that..
A rebuild involves tearing down a roster to bring in youth to lower salary cap costs or to free up cap space in the future. Seattle is currently $30 mil under the cap and in 2023 is projected to be $117 mil under the cap.Can someone define for me the difference between a rebuild and a reload, because I see threads with titles like this one and legitimately try to understand the case being made, but can't.
Maybe I'm wrong, but the way I interpret a rebuild, is more akin to what PC and JS did in 2010. Our roster, save for Hass and a player or two on D, was largely discarded and 'rebuilt from scratch. Literally torn down to zero and almost every position recast. We had no stars.
2022, we have 2 top 10 safeties. A player who looks to be a star at cb (albeit recovering from surgery), three stud LBS in Brooks, Taylor and now Nwosu, and at the least what look to be solid pieces on the o-line.
On offense, Chris Carson was statistically a top 10 to top 5 back, Penny closed out the year as the best in the league, and our top 2 Wrs have been in the conversation league wide about where they rank in terms of top duos. Our TE feature Fant and Dissly (hard to call their potential just average), and our o-line looks like it's a point of emphasis this off-season, so likely will be improved.
And we aren't even finished with free agency or the draft....
The QB position is 200% being rebuilt, but there wasn't a lot to be done about that and given the trade had to be made, the pieces we received in return, in my opinion, position us well to fill some wholes and compete right now with steady, but not spectacular qb play.
This doesn't feel at all to me like a team that's just dead in the water without a paddle or a sail.
I do understand how the performance last year, the varying opinions as to why we sucked, and then the loss of Russ, who given perception, appeared to be the only good thing we had, could make things look hopeless. But if you consider maybe that the reason we were as bad as we were was less talent, and more roadblocks that needed to be removed (coaches, a stubborn philosophy, and an impass at the qb position), it paints a very different picture. I don't even know that I'd call what's happening a reload. It feels more like a shift... for whatever that's worth.
Good question.Why is that? You think they won't have a bad season or that ownership will not fire Pete and John if they do. Or do you think the fans won't be calling for their heads.