hawknation2014
New member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,812
- Reaction score
- 1
Marvin49":32qflikc said:Its gotten to the point were big hits are flagged automatically...just because they are big hits.
Marvin49":2dngrgzo said:Chapow":2dngrgzo said:Marvin49":2dngrgzo said:They are losing because they have zero pass rush and they are getting penalized at the worst possible times. Some of those penalties are total BS and some were rightly earned by poor decision making.
So that's why huh? And here I was sitting here thinking that maybe losing that Bears game might have had something to do with Kap tossing 3 picks and losing a fumble.
Don't be silly....of course that had a lot to do with. They were ALSO penalized SIXTEEN TIMES vs. the Bears and couldn't put a rush on Cutler.
They had the same pass rush and penalty issue in Dallas even though they won the game.
hawknation2014":17chbivj said:
Chapow":1by0r2mk said:Marvin49":1by0r2mk said:Chapow":1by0r2mk said:Marvin49":1by0r2mk said:They are losing because they have zero pass rush and they are getting penalized at the worst possible times. Some of those penalties are total BS and some were rightly earned by poor decision making.
So that's why huh? And here I was sitting here thinking that maybe losing that Bears game might have had something to do with Kap tossing 3 picks and losing a fumble.
Don't be silly....of course that had a lot to do with. They were ALSO penalized SIXTEEN TIMES vs. the Bears and couldn't put a rush on Cutler.
They had the same pass rush and penalty issue in Dallas even though they won the game.
So they had the exact same issues with penalties and lack of pressure in the win and then the loss?
That sounds to me like the reason they lost the Bears game was due to Kaps turnovers in that case.
Marvin49":2xc9jcex said:hawknation2014":2xc9jcex said:
Right...show me ONE place where I said it was a conspiracy. I've said exactly the opposite.
Marvin49":2xc9jcex said:Well, he's right
hawknation2014":2j1k5w31 said:Marvin49":2j1k5w31 said:hawknation2014":2j1k5w31 said:
Right...show me ONE place where I said it was a conspiracy. I've said exactly the opposite.
Boldin is clearly arguing for some kind of conspiracy in refereeing against the 49ers:
"For me, it's been obvious the last two weeks: The amount of calls that have gone against us and the amount of calls that we've gotten hasn't been close," Boldin said Sunday after the 49ers' 23-14 loss to the Arizona Cardinals.
Boldin called the disparity and timing of the calls "unbelievable," adding later "if you're going to call it, call it both ways."
And what is Marvin's response to this asinine display of whining and conspiracy theorizing . . .
Marvin49":2j1k5w31 said:Well, he's right
Marvin49":199yokiv said:hawknation2014":199yokiv said:Marvin49":199yokiv said:hawknation2014":199yokiv said:
Right...show me ONE place where I said it was a conspiracy. I've said exactly the opposite.
Boldin is clearly arguing for some kind of conspiracy in refereeing against the 49ers:
"For me, it's been obvious the last two weeks: The amount of calls that have gone against us and the amount of calls that we've gotten hasn't been close," Boldin said Sunday after the 49ers' 23-14 loss to the Arizona Cardinals.
Boldin called the disparity and timing of the calls "unbelievable," adding later "if you're going to call it, call it both ways."
And what is Marvin's response to this asinine display of whining and conspiracy theorizing . . .
Marvin49":199yokiv said:Well, he's right
1) Where'd I say it was a conspiracy? In fact, I said SPECIFICALLY that it WASN'T.
2) What did I say RIGHT AFTER I said he was right?
Nice cherry picking. Please argue the things I actually say.
hawknation2014":z9uc1ssq said:Marvin49":z9uc1ssq said:hawknation2014":z9uc1ssq said:Marvin49":z9uc1ssq said:Right...show me ONE place where I said it was a conspiracy. I've said exactly the opposite.
Boldin is clearly arguing for some kind of conspiracy in refereeing against the 49ers:
"For me, it's been obvious the last two weeks: The amount of calls that have gone against us and the amount of calls that we've gotten hasn't been close," Boldin said Sunday after the 49ers' 23-14 loss to the Arizona Cardinals.
Boldin called the disparity and timing of the calls "unbelievable," adding later "if you're going to call it, call it both ways."
And what is Marvin's response to this asinine display of whining and conspiracy theorizing . . .
Marvin49":z9uc1ssq said:Well, he's right
1) Where'd I say it was a conspiracy? In fact, I said SPECIFICALLY that it WASN'T.
2) What did I say RIGHT AFTER I said he was right?
Nice cherry picking. Please argue the things I actually say.
Where did I say that picture was in reference to you?
In fact, it was referring to fool you're defending.
AbsolutNET":34zpnnn8 said:Well, the 2 roughing calls on hits to Stanton were pretty lame. I'd be mad if it were the Hawks getting those flags.
Largent80":o0w44mwp said:I think all fans can agree that the refs make a LOT of bad calls.
Some of them with video proof and they STILL get it wrong.
Nope.huskylawyer":14kvvp03 said:Did anyone notice that the head referee who was announcing the calls against the 49ers appeared to have utter disdain for the 49ers? It was almost like he was smirking when he was announcing the calls.
I bleed Seahawks, but I don't have the blinders on so tight to not notice that something is amiss, even against a rival. They are getting completely hosed on the calls. That hit in the pocket on Stanton was legal. The 49ers have a point.
The NFL is bordering on being unwatchable because of the flags. The game has become less about the players on the field, and more about which teams will get lucky in not getting bad calls.
Is Bruce wrong?Marvin49":25cie892 said:Kent Somers @kentsomers · 9m
Arians called 49ers LB Dan Skuta’s hit on QB Drew Stanton was “cheap shot....no doubt he was sliding. That could have ended his career.”
Really Bruce? Wow. And I liked the guy.