Le Batard "Sherman will call Patriots cheaters"

[aawolf]

This guy is weird, he's obviously upset over the Packers loss, but his hatred for the Seahawks is unreasonable and unprofessional.

He said "the defense, Kam, and Wagner were trying to take credit for the turn around" and disagreed with that premise.

His guest kept trying to set him straight, telling him that Sherman was much quieter this year, to which he responded "but he did that thing with Baldwin and the cardboard cut out." To which his guest said "that was in support of Lynch, it wasn't about himself."

Then he and on trying to argue that Brady's arm strength was just fine, except for his inability to throw the deep ball and Seattle doesn't stand a chance. But again, his guest tried to write him up saying he didn't think the Pats could score enough points against the Seahawks defense.

Sucks one having one AM sports channel to listen to, I finally had to turn it off. Who the hell is this guy anyway?

If I wethese Seahawks player, I would emulate Marshawn whenever ESPN interviewed me. Their quality control has really taken a hit lately with these lame "Green Bay gave the game away narratives."

Green Bay did kind of give the game away. You guys made all the plays you needed, but without the Packers not making several plays you still would have lost. In the end it doesn't matter much because you guys won.

Please read this if you will. http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/anatomy-of ... super-bowl

LOOK AT THE BOX SCORE--Seattle won in every statistical category except for turnovers. How was Green Bay soooo much better?

Team Stats



SEA

GNB

First downs 17 24
Rush-yards-TDs 23-58-1 44-187-3
Comp-Att-Yd-TD-INT 18-33-202-0-1 16-24-215-1-2
Sacked-yards 4-33 3-22
Net pass yards 169 193
Total yards 227 380
Fumbles-lost 1-1 2-1
Turnovers 2 3
Penalties-yards 7-69 10-74

 

[PackerBacker19]

This guy is weird, he's obviously upset over the Packers loss, but his hatred for the Seahawks is unreasonable and unprofessional.

He said "the defense, Kam, and Wagner were trying to take credit for the turn around" and disagreed with that premise.

His guest kept trying to set him straight, telling him that Sherman was much quieter this year, to which he responded "but he did that thing with Baldwin and the cardboard cut out." To which his guest said "that was in support of Lynch, it wasn't about himself."

Then he and on trying to argue that Brady's arm strength was just fine, except for his inability to throw the deep ball and Seattle doesn't stand a chance. But again, his guest tried to write him up saying he didn't think the Pats could score enough points against the Seahawks defense.

Sucks one having one AM sports channel to listen to, I finally had to turn it off. Who the hell is this guy anyway?

If I wethese Seahawks player, I would emulate Marshawn whenever ESPN interviewed me. Their quality control has really taken a hit lately with these lame "Green Bay gave the game away narratives."

Green Bay did kind of give the game away. You guys made all the plays you needed, but without the Packers not making several plays you still would have lost. In the end it doesn't matter much because you guys won.

Please read this if you will. http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/anatomy-of ... super-bowl

LOOK AT THE BOX SCORE--Seattle won in every statistical category except for turnovers. How was Green Bay soooo much better?

Team Stats



SEA

GNB

First downs 17 24
Rush-yards-TDs 23-58-1 44-187-3
Comp-Att-Yd-TD-INT 18-33-202-0-1 16-24-215-1-2
Sacked-yards 4-33 3-22
Net pass yards 169 193
Total yards 227 380
Fumbles-lost 1-1 2-1
Turnovers 2 3
Penalties-yards 7-69 10-74

And these stats are a reference to what game?

 

[UK_Seahawk]

Please read this if you will. http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/anatomy-of ... super-bowl

That article is full of fail I'm afraid. Basically it's saying that because the Packers didnt score on every drive they lost.

I might write an article called "21 reasons why the Seahawks didnt win by more" and just list failed drives.

 

[Seahawks Guy]

If you say Green Bay gave the game away at the end, then you have to say Seattle gave the game away for the first 55 minutes of regulation. The football bounced off of Bostick late in the game, but it also bounced off of Kearse for an interception twice before that. Is there some reason why Green Bay earned those turnovers and Seattle didn't earn that onside kick, when the same thing happened? So once all the mistakes and lucky plays evened out between the two teams, Seattle marched on to earn that victory. In fact, Seattle scored 3 straight touchdowns on 3 possessions at the end while the defense held GB to only field goals in the second half. It's clear who the better team was that day.

Also, I don't think it's logical to blame the loss on playcalling. Against a defense that can force turnovers (especially on a windy day) and can stop you on 3rd/4th and short, you don't take chances when you're ahead. Hell, Green Bay played themselves into a 99% chance of winning in the 4th quarter! Hindsight bias to the extreme.

 

[volsunghawk]

The Packers survived for 3 quarters on missed opportunities by Seattle? The Packers didn't survive they outplayed Seattle for most of the game?

I would suggest that the Packers clearly outplayed the Seahawks in the 1st quarter. In the 2nd, Seattle began to put together a long drive that ended in a turnover while GB was only able to kick a FG on an 11-yard drive and had two other drives that went nowhere before ending in a pick or a punt. Seattle clearly was still having horrible issues with turnovers, but they weren't dealing with the absolute futility of the 1st quarter. Look at it this way... GB racked up almost half the yards they got in the entire game in the 1st quarter. Seattle only gained 3 yards in the 1st. No question GB dominated the 1st quarter (though they could and should have had more points all things considered).

If you look to the 2nd half, both teams had a couple of short, nowhere drives in the 3rd quarter, but Seattle did get a long drive for a TD to cut the lead to 9. Advantage Seattle. And the 4th almost completely belonged to the Seahawks. Green Bay sustained a drive early and had the late push for a tying FG, but neither of those drives could get past the Seattle 30. And they did get another deflected pick. But after that pick, it was all Seattle.

Honestly, I think the fact that the game was tied at the end demonstrates how close these teams are in talent. If Seattle hadn't made a lot of uncharacteristic mistakes (like the multiple turnovers, some of which were just unlucky) and had some bonehead drops, that changes the game. If Green Bay hadn't made some uncharacteristic mistakes (Rodgers' picks, flubbed onside recovery, etc.), that changes the game. The difference is that the Seattle mistakes seemed to come at perfect intervals that continued to kill drives and keep the Packers in control through much of the game, whereas many of the GB mistakes piled up right at the end, allowing the comeback to thrive.

 

[Brahn]

Can you win the game in the 1st Quarter?

Can you win the game in the 2nd Quarter?

Can you win the game in the 3rd Quarter?

4th Quarter Baby You need to play us a full 60 minutes.

 

[Seafan]

This guy is weird, he's obviously upset over the Packers loss, but his hatred for the Seahawks is unreasonable and unprofessional.

He said "the defense, Kam, and Wagner were trying to take credit for the turn around" and disagreed with that premise.

His guest kept trying to set him straight, telling him that Sherman was much quieter this year, to which he responded "but he did that thing with Baldwin and the cardboard cut out." To which his guest said "that was in support of Lynch, it wasn't about himself."

Then he and on trying to argue that Brady's arm strength was just fine, except for his inability to throw the deep ball and Seattle doesn't stand a chance. But again, his guest tried to write him up saying he didn't think the Pats could score enough points against the Seahawks defense.

Sucks one having one AM sports channel to listen to, I finally had to turn it off. Who the hell is this guy anyway?

If I wethese Seahawks player, I would emulate Marshawn whenever ESPN interviewed me. Their quality control has really taken a hit lately with these lame "Green Bay gave the game away narratives."

Green Bay did kind of give the game away. You guys made all the plays you needed, but without the Packers not making several plays you still would have lost. In the end it doesn't matter much because you guys won.

Please read this if you will. http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/anatomy-of ... super-bowl

Yeah it doesn't matter since the Hawks won the game and we are the better team and outplayed the Packers and deserved to win it and have put the game in the rear view mirror where it will be forever.

 

[TriCHawk]

This guy is weird, he's obviously upset over the Packers loss, but his hatred for the Seahawks is unreasonable and unprofessional.

He said "the defense, Kam, and Wagner were trying to take credit for the turn around" and disagreed with that premise.

His guest kept trying to set him straight, telling him that Sherman was much quieter this year, to which he responded "but he did that thing with Baldwin and the cardboard cut out." To which his guest said "that was in support of Lynch, it wasn't about himself."

Then he and on trying to argue that Brady's arm strength was just fine, except for his inability to throw the deep ball and Seattle doesn't stand a chance. But again, his guest tried to write him up saying he didn't think the Pats could score enough points against the Seahawks defense.

Sucks one having one AM sports channel to listen to, I finally had to turn it off. Who the hell is this guy anyway?

If I wethese Seahawks player, I would emulate Marshawn whenever ESPN interviewed me. Their quality control has really taken a hit lately with these lame "Green Bay gave the game away narratives."

Green Bay did kind of give the game away. You guys made all the plays you needed, but without the Packers not making several plays you still would have lost. In the end it doesn't matter much because you guys won.

Please read this if you will. http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/anatomy-of ... super-bowl

Yeah it doesn't matter since the Hawks won the game and we are the better team and outplayed the Packers and deserved to win it and have put the game in the rear view mirror where it will be forever.

Exactly. I will remember it fondly.

 

[Boycie]

This guy is weird, he's obviously upset over the Packers loss, but his hatred for the Seahawks is unreasonable and unprofessional.

He said "the defense, Kam, and Wagner were trying to take credit for the turn around" and disagreed with that premise.

His guest kept trying to set him straight, telling him that Sherman was much quieter this year, to which he responded "but he did that thing with Baldwin and the cardboard cut out." To which his guest said "that was in support of Lynch, it wasn't about himself."

Then he and on trying to argue that Brady's arm strength was just fine, except for his inability to throw the deep ball and Seattle doesn't stand a chance. But again, his guest tried to write him up saying he didn't think the Pats could score enough points against the Seahawks defense.

Sucks one having one AM sports channel to listen to, I finally had to turn it off. Who the hell is this guy anyway?

If I wethese Seahawks player, I would emulate Marshawn whenever ESPN interviewed me. Their quality control has really taken a hit lately with these lame "Green Bay gave the game away narratives."

Green Bay did kind of give the game away. You guys made all the plays you needed, but without the Packers not making several plays you still would have lost. In the end it doesn't matter much because you guys won.

Please read this if you will. http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/anatomy-of ... super-bowl

Yeah it doesn't matter since the Hawks won the game and we are the better team and outplayed the Packers and deserved to win it and have put the game in the rear view mirror where it will be forever.

Exactly. I will remember it fondly.

Who cares about "who gave the game away?" The only thing that counts is the 28-22 score because the last time I checked, the game was a 60 minute game, and not a 57 minute game. That's why you play to the final whistle, and you don't sit out drives like Peppers and Mathews did, no matter how "gassed" you are.