fridayfrenzy":1kt0kfpj said:
Ratios should be factored in but so should cumulative stats. When Luck supporters want to argue they only use cumulative stats, when Wilson supporters want to argue they only use ratios.
That's because ratios are a far more accurate overall indicator...Cumulative statistics are largely pretty meaningless in the NFL.
Here, I'll prove my case to all the Luck knob-slobbering types right now; look at the top 25% of QBs based on total cumulative passing attempts and completions, then look at the top 25% of QBs on passing attempt-to-completion ratio.
Big difference in the list of names, and the better one isn't the cumulative list.
Gotta love the "my Ford Taurus is better than your Porsche 911 Turbo because I drive it more miles" crowd. :roll: