Its not Russ, its not Pete, It wasnt Schotty or Bevell...

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
John63":sksuf0q4 said:
Sgt. Largent":sksuf0q4 said:
John63":sksuf0q4 said:
I guess I don't agree with you saying its all Wilson when we know for a fact PC has said he wants chunk plays, which means longer routes, which means having to hold the ball longer. I am not saying some of the sacks are not on him, all qbs cause some of their sacks. I just don't believe out of the 40+ sacks this year more than 10-20% of them are on him. And either way does not excuse being hit, hurried, pressured and sacked don over 50% of your drop backs. Also Wilson is always top 5 in being pressured in under 2 seconds. Then if you want to talk about the 10-20% of sacks he causes you must also talked about the additional 10-20 he stops from happening.

It's not all Wilson. It's football, a team sport, every positive and every negative is some degree and percentage of praise or blame/criticism on all parts involved.

Guess that's where we part ways, you think it's more on Pete and the O-line that Russell gets sacked so much, and I think it's more on Wilson.

Mobile QB's get sacked more, pocket QB's who get the ball out quickly get sacked less.

So get All Pro's at every O-line position and Russell will still be in the top 10 in the league in sacks.

not if you change the system from chunk plays to take what's given, get the ball out quicker. I believe the biggest issue is the system, PC wants of chunk plays.

Pete wants ball control, a punishing run game and thinks that opens up opportunities for explosive play action down field.

So "chunk plays?" I think that's a basic way of looking at it. Playcalling is layered, you do certain things, give certain looks, run certain styles of offense early in order to open other things up in those games and drives.

That's what Pete believes in..........but does that suit Russell's game? Somewhat for me, but not entirely...........because I think what suits Russell is pace, tempo and getting him in rhythm. I think he said the word "pace" at least a dozen times this year in his pressers, especially in his last presser after the Rams game.

THAT'S what I wish Pete would pay attention to, and implement more into the offense and consider that for his next coordinator hire.

Doubtful. But that's my dream.
 

AubHawk71

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
417
Reaction score
94
It's Pete.

He's not accountable to anyone. Jody, bless her, kept the team in Seattle, tho there are probably more than a handful of people in town that could just write her a check for 3 billion or whatever the team is worth.

Her resume:

Having an insanely rich brother since the late 80s
Aerobics instructor

She is not the Titan of Industry that many other team owners are. How is she going to tell Pete how to run HIS team?

There is a lot of talk about Pete's ability to recruit and train players, etc. All that off field stuff is great, be he has shown again and again that he can choke during games when the heat is turned up. Is it getting worse as time goes on?

The OC will always been hamstrung by Pete. As someone wisely said in another thread, Pete manages his coords badly because 'They get all the responsibility, but no autonomy or decision making.' I've been in that situation before. The boss makes the plan, but if it doesn't pan out in Real Life (looked great on paper!) then it is all your fault, even tho you aren't allowed to make any changes to fix it during execution. Which leads to:

'We need to adjust better and earlier.' Pete says this all the time. But they can't, because he has to sign off on everything during the game, and he is NOT by any means quick on the draw. That stupid 4th and 1 that turned into 4th and 6 during the playoff game because Pete was futzing around on the sidelines. I thought they were trying to draw off-sides. Nope, Russ is standing out there waiting for Pete to....? Override Schotty? Whoops!

I actually enjoy watching other teams more now, because they have some creativity. Flea flicker plays, other sorts of catch them off guard stuff. I would love to think that Pete could do that (or let his OC do that), but when he does is fails miserably.OC's probably don't even bother to show him creative plays because what's the point? It wasn't his idea.

Russ? Wow he was killing it the first part of the season, but blew his load early because he was carrying the D. But also as the D improved Pete had to stick his finger in the O pie and futz it up.

I will leave with a Pete quote which sums up my feelings of watching the same game over and over. And I am a patient man:

'It takes patience. Sure, nobody wants to see it.'
 

Mad Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
2,493
Reaction score
636
I like that there are some more nuanced opinions about how we ended up out of the playoffs earlier than expected.

My nuanced opinion is: The Rams played better than we did. They hit harder, ran faster, were more aggressive, looked more disciplined. On that day. They also had days where they looked passive. But on that day they looked like the alpha dogs.

I'm not sure why. Maybe playing for a QB that had broken his thumb brought out the alpha in them? Maybe the Hawks thought this game was "in the bag" and they were looking ahead. Who knows. But it happens.

i watched Aaron Rodgers lose his 4th NFCCG, this time at home, and he had a wide open Davantae Adams on a free play and failed to even look his way. This is the consensus league MVP this year. It happens even to the best of them.

I play tennis with a group of guys and some days I have no problem beating them and sometimes they beat me. When everyone is near the same level, anyone can beat anyone on the right day.

We like to think we can will our way to great things. But truth is, fortune and circumstances play a large role in how things in life turn out.

All you can do every season is hope your team is at least trying it's best to win and see where the season takes you. I believe Russ and Pete and John are trying their best.
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
I will just reiterate once again, it's Pete.

Oads2F20142F122FNikola Tesla Quotes with Photos

The mental gymnastics and "theories" going on in here is not necessary.

DK tweet
[tweet]https://twitter.com/MikeDugar/status/1353854771338219520[/tweet]
 

hoxrox

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
1,972
It's Pete for poor game day management and hiring sub par coordinators in the first place.

It's John for not prioritizing oline, or drafting a player like Chubb who would make defenses respect the run game, and not play two deep all the time.

It's Shotty for not putting together creative and dynamic game plans that would utilize multiple targets on a regular basis. For not adjusting to the strengths and weakness of a defenses.

It's Russ for being indecisive, being confused by coverages, and holding onto the ball too long and not taking the underneath and intermediate shots when available. For taking sacks and putting the offense in 3rd and forever situations. Sorry Russ apologists, film don't lie.

They all ALL culpable. To put it all on one person is severely shortsighted, and grossly ignorant to the reality at hand here.

/end thread
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
hoxrox":2ln80hzv said:
It's Pete for poor game day management and hiring sub par coordinators in the first place.

It's John for not prioritizing oline, or drafting a player like Chubb who would make defenses respect the run game, and not play two deep all the time.

It's Shotty for not putting together creative and dynamic game plans that would utilize multiple targets on a regular basis. For not adjusting to the strengths and weakness of a defenses.

It's Russ for being indecisive, being confused by coverages, and holding onto the ball too long and not taking the underneath and intermediate shots when available. For taking sacks and putting the offense in 3rd and forever situations. Sorry Russ apologists, film don't lie.

They all ALL culpable. To put it all on one person is severely shortsighted, and grossly ignorant to the reality at hand here.

/end thread

There's no place here for logic, reason and a sensible well thought out approach to these complex issues.

You must choose one person to blame, and then cling to your half baked opinions like grim death for all of forum eternity.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,711
Reaction score
10,129
Location
Sammamish, WA
Win as a team, lose as a team. Plenty of "blame" to go around. From top to bottom, they have the talent to get this done. They underperformed in the playoffs. As a team, QB, offense, defense and Coaching. All of it.
They will be back and strong in 2021.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,231
Reaction score
3,016
Location
Spokane, WA
hoxrox":2fbsznes said:
It's Pete for poor game day management and hiring sub par coordinators in the first place.

It's John for not prioritizing oline, or drafting a player like Chubb who would make defenses respect the run game, and not play two deep all the time.

It's Shotty for not putting together creative and dynamic game plans that would utilize multiple targets on a regular basis. For not adjusting to the strengths and weakness of a defenses.

It's Russ for being indecisive, being confused by coverages, and holding onto the ball too long and not taking the underneath and intermediate shots when available. For taking sacks and putting the offense in 3rd and forever situations. Sorry Russ apologists, film don't lie.

They all ALL culpable. To put it all on one person is severely shortsighted, and grossly ignorant to the reality at hand here.

/end thread

Mic. Drop.

And I agree completely. Very well said
 

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,077
Reaction score
1,776
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Well thought out, well written post. TY. I got most of it, and will come back later for the rest.
 

Threedee

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,570
Reaction score
851
Location
Federal Way, WA
You can banter about all of the theories about what deficiencies Carroll/Schotty/Wilson bring to the game, but Bevell physically pulled the kill button that ended a SB for us. You can definitely blame someone for us "not getting it done."

Now, I tend to defend the players on the field, and will always defend Wilson. I can never figure out what the hell Pete is doing, and my primary criticism of him is his lack of care for the OL. Beyond that, he's a headscratcher for me.
 

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,326
Reaction score
1,012
keasley45":3lhol67f said:
Maybe its just the ultimate embodiment of the unique character of this team.

Not to create yet another 'who's fault is it ' thread, but i wanted to post a possible scenario around how and why we are where we are with the team today that doesnt necessarily 'incriminate' anyone, but rather looks at the situation as just a case of trying to work through the gifts and challenges of a very unique circumstance and rare player at QB.

I think we can all use a bit less of the polarizing talk when it comes to Pete vs Schotty (or whoever the OC will now be ) vs Russ and the blame game for who is responsible when we dont succeed. I've certainly been guilty of going down the rabbit hole when it comes to trying to untangle the mess of our season and the last several years. But I think at the end of the day, the reality is that there isnt a 'BAD GUY' in this plot. just a bunch of guys commited to trying to figure out the best way to win.And they are much closer to what's actually going on than we are. The best we can do is look at game film.

Everyone is due their fair share of praise for the success we have seen and responsibility for the challenges.

The two constants in this game are Russ and Pete. The OC, interchangeable - although it would be great if we could get some consistency at the position, the fact that we havent found that is beginning to look like evidence to me for what might really be going on. The team has been trying to figure itself out for a while now and i think what we just finally saw this season was hopefully the last phase of a long, 4 year exploration.

I honestly believe that since the collapse of the LOB and the departure of Lynch, there has been a concerted effort to try to transition the team to RW, both from a leadership perspective, which i think he has done, but also from a scheme perspective, which to date we have struggled with. But ultimately what does that transition to a passing offense look like for such a unique QB.

He's similar in height to D Brees but doesnt have Brees's savant like ability to diagnose a defense and hit 10 different WR a game consistently. Brees overcomes the challenge of maybe not being able to SEE everything by being so enmeshed in the plays that he can run the O with his eyes closed and hit his receivers anywhere on the field so long as they are where they are designed to be. He has a rare and uncanny abiliity in this sense and i'd wager that if there was a NEXT GEN stat that could measure his brain's ability to read and react, / process data, he'd be off the charts.

Russ has come to defeat his issues with his physical stature by moving outside the pocket, releasing the ball and diagnosing plays from a deeper drop, and when all else fails, punishing a defense with is escapability and timely runs. Like Brees, he's incredibly accurate on the long ball and overall in general, when he has the opportunity to see where he's going with the ball. Russ, an uncanny pocket sense. Drew, an uncanny field sense. Again - my observation, not set in stone fact.

But given the above, an offense built around a passing game will by default need to look a bit different for Drew than for Russ. To say that Russ can do what Drew can from a shear technical ability , is in my opinon just as foolish as someone expecting Brees to be able to do what Russ can (nobody in the league can do what he can). And thats not throwing shade on Russ, he's fully capable of executing an offense. Its more praise for Drew because the dude is just that good.

The question is, what does that magical passing game look like for our QB?

Well...

It was apparent that the OC we had when we were built around a legendary defense and sledghammer in ballet shoes in Beastmode, no longer fit the profile for a team that was moving to a more aggressive passing game. He was let go.

What did that more aggressive passing game mean? Nobody knew until this year because nobody had seen RW with reliable running backs and a philosophy that was built around his arm moreso than his legs. We'd come to know him as a QB that could make something out of nothing when the plays didnt go according to plan. He built his legend on improv - turning nothing into a mile long highlight reel of spectacular plays.

But i think MAYBE at some point the improv act which had been just a tool for Russ, whether because of a poor play design, not being able to see receivers, not being able to process reads quickly, or being conditioned through years of HAVING to be ready to break from the scheme due to poor protection and do his own thing, became his default style of play.

So now, enter Schottenheimer, a guy, for all the criticism leveled at him, showed that he could pull together some pretty effectve schemes. I dont know how much responsibility to assign the OC or the QB for the inability to effectively implement a passing game that was diverse in terms of its range of routes and combinations, but the results... well, we saw them. however, i dont think its s a stretch to assume that RW is a contributing factor. He cant NOT be for the adjustments that have to be made for his height alone (deeper drops, slightly longer developing routes). And that's not bashing him at all, it just is what it is.

The question beyond that is how much of his natural tendency to want to move out of the pocket to see routes is absolutely necessary (ie , how much CAN he see at a 3 or 5 step drop from under center or a catch and release from shotgun) vs it just now being how he plays. If its how he's been conditioned to play, then the challenge is re instilling the discipline to run the offense called - essentially reconditioning him to know the field and trust it and on occassion, throw blind to a spot you trust a wr to be. If its vision (he CANT see the field in certain instances) and his ability to analyze a read, post snap iand trust it is severely impaired because his defuault reaction for 9 years has been to get the ball and move, then that's a bit more difficult to overcome. And it could also certainly by both - and likely is.

Either way, now at year 10, then the offensive strategy needs to shift. If he can get his discipline back, he should eventually be able to make the reads and get the ball out quickly. And again, i dont know whether what we saw this year from him (patting the ball, the double clutches, the indecisiveness) was a failure in being able to drop back and 1,2,3 read, react and get the ball out to the open guy in the flow of the offense, or if t was that he was trying to do it but couldnt see, and thus was constantly forced to break pocket and look deeper, which right off the bat negates the playcall and puts the chances of the down succeeding on RW and a given wr's ability to read eachother and connect. however, from what i've seen on tape over 16 weeks, i can say comfortably that although you can criticize Schotty fro maybe not adapting in game with a reasonable quickness or not calling up enough plays to RB's, there were A LOT of plays left on the field. And it could just be that the disconnect between PC and Schotty that led to his firing was a desire on Schotty's part to keep trying down the road of getting RW to function more effectively as a complete passer in the flow of the offense and plays called, getting him to use the whole field. Whereas Pete sees the best path to move the offense and RW forward being to stop trying to push him to do what he now obviously struggles to do and supplement the short pass game quick reads and a more methodical progression down the field, with a more schematically diverse and intentional run game.

And that run game CAN get us where we want to go. If its effective, it sets up all of those incredible passes Russ is known for. On its own, it can be lethal either by virtue of its diversity or its factor of intimidation. Which, depends on who is running the rock. The one thing i will say thats a bit concerning is that even if Carson comes back, between he and Penny, we have a back that is lightning quick through the hole and a bulldozer, but struggles to break long runs and a RB who dances too much in finding the holes, but can take it to the house on any given play if he breaks the first line of defense. Because they are so different, WHEN we deploy them in a game can be a tell as to what we want to do. If chris is in we are a bit more diverse, although he doesnt have great long or edge speed. When Penny is in, its likely going outside. What we need to really help Russ is either a scheme that can leverage both styles effectively, or a different back altogether. Someone like Jones in GB or conceptually the tandems that Cleveland or KC run. In the case of KC and Cleveland, either back can go inside or outside, but they each have their obvious strengths.

If you cant draw up short to middle pass plays, you have to develop a combination of longer developing passes and screens with a FAST running attack that is effective on the edges early in games and a PUNISHING one up the middle late. Gaining 5 yards consistently on swing plays, and runs off tackle forces defenses to play the width of the field. I think its why we saw the hawks constantly trying to establish the edge running game even though they knew they could reliably get 3.5 ypc between the tackles. without a consistent threat to spread the d-line and backers out, the field gets small for both runs and passes. And even harder for a shorter QB to fit the ball into tight openings.

The running game, and a well designed one that stretches the defense and punishes it seems to me to not be simply the preference of a head coach, but if any of the above is remotely true, pretty much necessary in getting RW back on the track to success.

this post is wayyyy too long but thats only because the challenges the team now faces (and i guess has faced all along) are complex and not as cut and dry as letting Russ cook, or keeping Pete out of a playbook, Russ being broken, or the OC being a dud. There's a ton that Pete and the coordinators are looking at on O to unlock the potential of this team. Some of it is in just unlocking (not unleashing) Russ, some of it is scheme, some of it, personnel and all of it doable.

We've been quick to condemn coaches and players for the failures to date but in all honesty, like everything else about the franchise, the difficulty in finding the ultimate success over the last few years is like everything else around this team, due to the fact that the circumstances are just sooo unique. Starting with the QB. And thats a blessing and a curse. But it is what it is. Cant believe i'm about to say this but it genuinely in this case really is all about the process and evolving.

I'm confident we will get there.


Nice post Keasley45


LTH
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
hoxrox":1tfj8hye said:
It's Pete for poor game day management and hiring sub par coordinators in the first place.

It's John for not prioritizing oline, or drafting a player like Chubb who would make defenses respect the run game, and not play two deep all the time.
Pete has roster control, and final say. Hard for John to do his job, when Pete can mettle at any time.

hoxrox":1tfj8hye said:
It's Shotty for not putting together creative and dynamic game plans that would utilize multiple targets on a regular basis. For not adjusting to the strengths and weakness of a defenses.
It's Pete's offense. Pete likes to keep it simple, and play "overly careful." He is content with punting.

hoxrox":1tfj8hye said:
It's Russ for being indecisive, being confused by coverages, and holding onto the ball too long and not taking the underneath and intermediate shots when available. For taking sacks and putting the offense in 3rd and forever situations. Sorry Russ apologists, film don't lie.
Russ is doing what Pete directs. Chuck it deep, take care of the ball. In that setup, those issues will arise.

hoxrox":1tfj8hye said:
They all ALL culpable. To put it all on one person is severely shortsighted, and grossly ignorant to the reality at hand here. /end thread
They ALL answer to Pete. If they don't like it and fall in line, they will no longer be with the team. We'll just call it philosophical differences.
 

hoxrox

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
1,972
Fade":32ff8bu0 said:
hoxrox":32ff8bu0 said:
It's Pete for poor game day management and hiring sub par coordinators in the first place.

It's John for not prioritizing oline, or drafting a player like Chubb who would make defenses respect the run game, and not play two deep all the time.
Pete has roster control, and final say. Hard for John to do his job, when Pete can mettle at any time.

hoxrox":32ff8bu0 said:
It's Shotty for not putting together creative and dynamic game plans that would utilize multiple targets on a regular basis. For not adjusting to the strengths and weakness of a defenses.
It's Pete's offense. Pete likes to keep it simple, and play "overly careful." He is content with punting.

hoxrox":32ff8bu0 said:
It's Russ for being indecisive, being confused by coverages, and holding onto the ball too long and not taking the underneath and intermediate shots when available. For taking sacks and putting the offense in 3rd and forever situations. Sorry Russ apologists, film don't lie.
Russ is doing what Pete directs. Chuck it deep, take care of the ball. In that setup, those issues will arise.

hoxrox":32ff8bu0 said:
They all ALL culpable. To put it all on one person is severely shortsighted, and grossly ignorant to the reality at hand here. /end thread
They ALL answer to Pete. If they don't like it and fall in line, they will no longer be with the team. We'll just call it philosophical differences.

I think we just disagree on Pete's management style. Although he assumes absolute authority, it doesn't necessarily mean he exercises absolute control.

Some may cite the overrule on 4th and 1 as an example of meddling, but the overrule was a Carson run up the gut. What if Shotty called a long-developing pass play? I'm sure Reid has overruled Bieniemy before as well. It's kind of what head coaches do.

Also I'll assume it was John who selected Penny over Chubb, or Pete agreed based on John's recommendation. I don't think Pete had a gun pointed to John's head on draft day, telling him to select Penny, or else.

Rather, I think Pete leadership style is more to "let players be" and allow them to grow and thrive within the program. Let Marshawn be Marshawn. Let Earl be Earl. That is, until you put yourself above the team.

I believe this management style extends to his coaching staff as well. In fact, sometimes I think he allows too much rope. He allows too many chances...

I just don't believe he rules with an iron fist. But when you fail to deliver results over the course of a season or two, then yes of course, the axe is warranted.
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
hoxrox":ki9keozu said:
Fade":ki9keozu said:
hoxrox":ki9keozu said:
It's Pete for poor game day management and hiring sub par coordinators in the first place.

It's John for not prioritizing oline, or drafting a player like Chubb who would make defenses respect the run game, and not play two deep all the time.
Pete has roster control, and final say. Hard for John to do his job, when Pete can mettle at any time.

hoxrox":ki9keozu said:
It's Shotty for not putting together creative and dynamic game plans that would utilize multiple targets on a regular basis. For not adjusting to the strengths and weakness of a defenses.
It's Pete's offense. Pete likes to keep it simple, and play "overly careful." He is content with punting.

hoxrox":ki9keozu said:
It's Russ for being indecisive, being confused by coverages, and holding onto the ball too long and not taking the underneath and intermediate shots when available. For taking sacks and putting the offense in 3rd and forever situations. Sorry Russ apologists, film don't lie.
Russ is doing what Pete directs. Chuck it deep, take care of the ball. In that setup, those issues will arise.

hoxrox":ki9keozu said:
They all ALL culpable. To put it all on one person is severely shortsighted, and grossly ignorant to the reality at hand here. /end thread
They ALL answer to Pete. If they don't like it and fall in line, they will no longer be with the team. We'll just call it philosophical differences.

I think we just disagree on Pete's management style. Although he assumes absolute authority, it doesn't necessarily mean he exercises absolute control.

Some may cite the overrule on 4th and 1 as an example of meddling, but the overrule was a Carson run up the gut. What if Shotty called a long-developing pass play? I'm sure Reid has overruled Bieniemy before as well. It's kind of what head coaches do.

Also I'll assume it was John who selected Penny over Chubb, or Pete agreed based on John's recommendation. I don't think Pete had a gun pointed to John's head on draft day, telling him to select Penny, or else.

Rather, I think Pete leadership style is more to "let players be" and allow them to grow and thrive within the program. Let Marshawn be Marshawn. Let Earl be Earl. That is, until you put yourself above the team.

I believe this management style extends to his coaching staff as well. In fact, sometimes I think he allows too much rope. He allows too many chances...

I just don't believe he rules with an iron fist. But when you fail to deliver results over the course of a season or two, then yes of course, the axe is warranted.
[youtube]fUkL2BapgD8[/youtube]

Watch the video. He was fine with Schotty and planned to keep him, and then Pete learned Schotty was unwilling to be a "yes" man going forward.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,903
Reaction score
1,082
Fade had a story about Pete freaking out about game day meals.

If true, that should tell you everything you need about how much control he demands. That is not a problem you solve. It is just an issue you learn to live with as long as Carroll is there.

Carroll has an almost magical ability to pull great players out of what seem to be flawed pools.

He is also an incredible motivator.

Those are the things that he relies on to win.

He is a below-average tactician. He is an average strategist.

That is actually somewhat harsh but essentially he can coach certain systems with certain players better than anyone else. But he cannot adjust or adapt if he does not have the players to run those systems. He is dependent on a certain playstyle whether he has the players for it or not.

And since those kinds of players are extremely difficult to find or build, we either pull out the stops to get them (Adams trade) or we stumble along when we are missing them (T Thompson, etc.)

This is very bad news if we lose Carson because Carroll depends on incredible RBs that somehow can get good yardage with sometimes godawful run blocking (where you have to make the first cut behind the LOS).

It has ALWAYS been Pete though. The winning and losing. Everything this team accomplishes and ever time this team falls short - those are ALL on Pete. It shouldn't even be debatable at this point.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
TwistedHusky":3fc07vdp said:
Fade had a story about Pete freaking out about game day meals.

If true, that should tell you everything you need about how much control he demands. That is not a problem you solve. It is just an issue you learn to live with as long as Carroll is there.

Carroll has an almost magical ability to pull great players out of what seem to be flawed pools.

He is also an incredible motivator.

Those are the things that he relies on to win.

He is a below-average tactician. He is an average strategist.

That is actually somewhat harsh but essentially he can coach certain systems with certain players better than anyone else. But he cannot adjust or adapt if he does not have the players to run those systems. He is dependent on a certain playstyle whether he has the players for it or not.

And since those kinds of players are extremely difficult to find or build, we either pull out the stops to get them (Adams trade) or we stumble along when we are missing them (T Thompson, etc.)

This is very bad news if we lose Carson because Carroll depends on incredible RBs that somehow can get good yardage with sometimes godawful run blocking (where you have to make the first cut behind the LOS).

It has ALWAYS been Pete though. The winning and losing. Everything this team accomplishes and ever time this team falls short - those are ALL on Pete. It shouldn't even be debatable at this point.

agreed and that is why he needs Wilson, it is a win-win for him. Either Wilson pulls his a$$ out of the fire or he has a scapegoat.
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
TwistedHusky":3fufk4yn said:
Fade had a story about Pete freaking out about game day meals.
To give people a little more background on this who are unaware. Pete was doing a press confernece I think around the time they were going to the SuperBowl against NE.

And they got on the subject of what was different in Seattle vs. his time in NE. And Pete talked about control, not having enough of it. Then he went on to describe the level of detail of control he wanted. He proceeds to tell a story about having (I think it was training camp lunches planned.) But ownership overruled him, and didn't go with his meal plan. Pete was sideways about this even when telling the story, it really, really, bothered him.

TwistedHusky":3fufk4yn said:
Carroll has an almost magical ability to pull great players out of what seem to be flawed pools.

He is also an incredible motivator.

Those are the things that he relies on to win.

He is a below-average tactician. He is an average strategist.

That is actually somewhat harsh but essentially he can coach certain systems with certain players better than anyone else. But he cannot adjust or adapt if he does not have the players to run those systems. He is dependent on a certain playstyle whether he has the players for it or not.

And since those kinds of players are extremely difficult to find or build, we either pull out the stops to get them (Adams trade) or we stumble along when we are missing them (T Thompson, etc.)

This is very bad news if we lose Carson because Carroll depends on incredible RBs that somehow can get good yardage with sometimes godawful run blocking (where you have to make the first cut behind the LOS).

It has ALWAYS been Pete though. The winning and losing. Everything this team accomplishes and ever time this team falls short - those are ALL on Pete. It shouldn't even be debatable at this point.

Pete is as good as it gets when it comes to getting players to run through a brickwall. Seemingly they have to every week on offense, because the other team knows what's comin'.

I think you're selling Pete a little short on the defensive side of the ball as a tactician, though. But ultimately you are correct, especially, right here, right now in the 2020 NFL. He is far behind as a strategist, and tends to just lean on belief and philosophy from years past, oblivious to what the upcoming opponent is doing.

And that's why it is imperative, that the New OC is given the necessary freedom to operate his offense, Pete cannot handcuff him, or bad things are going to happen to this franchise over the next few years. I've said if for years, Pete just needs to give his OC 1 directive and gets the hell outta his way. "We run it more than we throw it." The nuances of how you exactly do that, need to be left up to the OC, not Pete.
 

DarkVictory23

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
1,168
Reaction score
1,784
TwistedHusky":1m1asrug said:
Fade had a story about Pete freaking out about game day meals.

If true, that should tell you everything you need about how much control he demands. That is not a problem you solve. It is just an issue you learn to live with as long as Carroll is there.

Carroll has an almost magical ability to pull great players out of what seem to be flawed pools.

He is also an incredible motivator.

Those are the things that he relies on to win.

He is a below-average tactician. He is an average strategist.

That is actually somewhat harsh but essentially he can coach certain systems with certain players better than anyone else. But he cannot adjust or adapt if he does not have the players to run those systems. He is dependent on a certain playstyle whether he has the players for it or not.

And since those kinds of players are extremely difficult to find or build, we either pull out the stops to get them (Adams trade) or we stumble along when we are missing them (T Thompson, etc.)

This is very bad news if we lose Carson because Carroll depends on incredible RBs that somehow can get good yardage with sometimes godawful run blocking (where you have to make the first cut behind the LOS).

It has ALWAYS been Pete though. The winning and losing. Everything this team accomplishes and ever time this team falls short - those are ALL on Pete. It shouldn't even be debatable at this point.
I just wanted to highlight this part because I think it really hurts us, but I think our line gets a little too much blame for a failure of scheme here, because we force our RBs to rush from Shotgun all the time. Even with decent run blocking, this style essentially requires at least one cut before getting past the LOS.

I put a lot of the blame for this on Pete because it's our scheme we've had for a long time but I'm not sure we don't do it to some degree to because Russell prefers to work out of that formation. (I also think there's a decent chance we do it because once upon a time the read option was a big threat for our offense and we have not adjusted to the fact that Russell reading 'keep' happens only once in a blue moon and is no longer a reason to line up in sub-optimal formation for so many obvious running situations.)
 

NFSeahawks

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
0
Pete is to blame and Russell is to blame.

Russell isnt consistant enough, needs to be able to methodically move down the field and he has rarely shown that ability.
 
Top