At first, I wasn't happy, but after you break it down, it was the smart move. Here is why I think that:
---We were not going to pay Russ 50M per year after this season. That means we lose him within 2 years anyway. At least this way, we get value.
---if Carroll or Schneider do suck and russ has been saving them the whole time, or if russ is the one causing sacks and lack of short field offense, we will know that in max two years, maybe 1. This will make it easier for ownership to make management decisions.
---We won a superbowl in part because we didn't have to pay franchise QB money. If the management can put together a top 5 defense and a top 10 offense, we should have a better overall shot.
---It gives us the ability to tailor manpower to an offensive scheme. The Waldron type of offense isn't really a massive deep ball type of an offense. It played to russ's weaknesses, and Waldron was unable to adapt to russ's strengths. We had to make a choice.
We were going to field the same mess we saw this year again unless we changed some major pieces. We still might, and probably will be mediocre, but I'm thinking at worst just barely under .500 this year. It might take a couple years, but I'm actually coming around and even excited to finally find out whether the seahawks relative success (record wise and consistency) was Pete or russ. While I am a russ fan, the hawks are for sure first, so I will be rooting for Denver losses for sure.
Hopefully this doesn't go complete garbage fire for the hawks and we return to the bad old days.