Even if they DO make a good pick and/or have a great draft, LIKE THEY DID JUST LAST YEAR, you'll somehow revert to their past mistakes. Rince, and repeat.
We all get it by now, Pete and John suck.
We all get it by now, Pete and John suck.
What Team did you say you Coached to a Lombardi? LOLOL I rest my case.If McDowell was a safe Round #1 pick he would've went in the 1st round. He wasn't.
They struggle to field a competent defense, despite the massive investment. You have to be a real special piece of work to not recognize how terrible they have been at putting that unit together for what is inching towards a decade in the not too distant future. This is a fact not my opinion.
I praise their offensive picks over the same time frame. I don't "Pee" on those as you say, because they do a good job on that side of the ball. I praised the Geno contract as well. Hell, I wish they drafted more on offense and less on defense because of this fact.
Pete Carroll DB Whispering aside, they are a trainwreck on defense. And with Clint Hurtt and co. trotting out the same mess they want to call a scheme as last year, I have zero confidence it will be any different from what we've been watching for a long time now.
Aren't you sick of it? The one being dishonest is you. Stop lying to yourself and recognize there is an issue on defense and changes at the top need to occur for it to get fixed. Most will be on my side if they are bottom 5 again after this year. There are no more excuses.
And vice-versaGood guards can compensate for a weak center.
^^ABSOLUTELY ^^ THIS^^Another way to look at past lines, what if those added to the team were destined to fail because of how the offense was structured?
R3 re-enforced just how hard it was to block for him in Denver. We will never know for sure. But if bringing in traditional players equates to future success I think we can all breathe easier about the future.
You are right, we therefore ought to draft a center and give him the time to learn.Having a QB with as much knowledge of the offense as Geno does would be very beneficial to a rookie C. Geno could either make the line calls or help the young guy make the right calls. Adding a rookie C this year would be similar to getting a QB in that they wouldn't have to take on all the responsibilities they'll have in the years to come.

We need to get talent at guard before we can feel comfortable with a hohum project center.Good guards can compensate for a weak center.
Another way to look at past lines, what if those added to the team were destined to fail because of how the offense was structured?
R3 re-enforced just how hard it was to block for him in Denver. We will never know for sure. But if bringing in traditional players equates to future success I think we can all breathe easier about the future.
You're talkin' Bull$#it Pitt, Wilson was responsible for the PLETHORA of Hits, Hurries & UNNECESSARY number of sacks...PROOF?? it CONTINUED when he went to the Donko's.With the regularity of sacks by any QB in a Pete Carroll system, I believe the answer is pretty obvious. It wasnt just Wilson, its all of them.
You're talkin' Bull$#it Pitt, Wilson was responsible for the PLETHORA of Hits, Hurries & UNNECESSARY number of sacks...PROOF?? it CONTINUED when he went to the Donko's.
Geno DID NOT have anything close to resembling the same shit that Wilson did under Pete Carroll's Coaching here in Seattle, P-E-R-I-O-D!!
Sacks numbers aren't the best to use, as Seattle centers usually aren't credited with more than 2 in a single season.Max Unger allowed 3 sacks between 2012-2014. Quality matters, which is why Sean Payton targeted Max. Max anchored the Saint line with 3000 snaps the 3 years after the trade.
Somehow, the Saints totally won that trade even though Hawks acquired All-World Jimmy.
Seahawks have been searching for a true replacement ever since. In a great center draft, it’s time to upgrade.