RedAlice
Well-known member
even more than the best teams: the best coached!
I will give Hawks the advantage on pants the coaches choose to wear.
I will give Hawks the advantage on pants the coaches choose to wear.
I am only saying that Luck plays a part with experience. Mostly that experience means you have seen more luck than those who have no experience.
Luck is always there. the more experienced have seen it more, and will continue to push it and so WILL GET LUCKY.
Darnold is still clawing his way to even be good. He has a lot to prove, and the Seahawks are his vehicle right now.
I'm good with itLost some respect for you on this post.
I dont think you can say Darnold is clawing to be good. You dont put up the play he has over the last 2 years without having one helluva toolkit and talent to go along with it. But like 'luck', much of the game comes down to certain intangibles. Certain guys possess a calm under pressure and come into the game with it. Its as much chemical / phyiological as it is anything else. The game just moves slower for them and they are able to 'see' and anticipate things as much because of innate 'feel' as any experience gained. I have seen it at the peewee level where there are kids who play qb, practice their asses off and have good enough talent but cant beat out the kid who switches into QB from WR and just gets it from day one. There isnt 'experience' there. Its just a feel for the game.
Darnold has experience. From where i sit, its a questions of whether he can accumulate enough of it still to offset what he is obviously missing in the intangibles department.
I’ll give it to Satfford, he’s been in the McVay system for a while now, so, advantage definitely goes to Stafford but considering Seattle was still in position to win the game while having 4 turnovers and the defense still playing at an elite level, Seattle, is not far behind the Rams.
We’ll be back! And hopefully, with all starters healthy!
You are correct in one aspect: Darnold has experience. In losing. Darnold seeing "ghosts" is not a meme because it's false, it is a mimic of how he plays.
I do think I can say that Darnold is clawing to be good, because he has not won anything yet. He is clawing to win the ultimate that he desires: a Lombardi. He is clawing for that.
He views the Hawks as a vehicle for what he wants: a Lombardi
IMO: Darnold played like he was good the whole game. He did not fold or bow down. He is determined.
--








You are correct in one aspect: Darnold has experience. In losing. Darnold seeing "ghosts" is not a meme because it's false, it is a mimic of how he plays.
I do think I can say that Darnold is clawing to be good, because he has not won anything yet. He is clawing to win the ultimate that he desires: a Lombardi. He is clawing for that.
He views the Hawks as a vehicle for what he wants: a Lombardi
IMO: Darnold played like he was good the whole game. He did not fold or bow down. He is determined.
--
There are very average qbs who have won playoff games. That isnt the measure of whether a player is good or not.
There's an argument that home field advantage is considered worth three points. Given the results of this game, on a neutral field you'd expect the Seahawks to win, 4 interceptions and all. Of course, we have the game in Seattle to see if that holds true.And this is why imo I feel Seattle is the better team. It’s not by much. But still in a position to win by 1 point only lost by 2 even after everything negatively that happened.
I feel.. unlike many, what you’re saying is true however I also feel, unlike previous stops for Darnold Seattle has the staff to coach him up. His mistakes he made weren’t ones that can’t be corrected. They’re coachable which leaves room for plenty of growth. Which Darnold imo also feels that way being in Seattle
He he did well but my post was about why I thought Sam didn’t play well.IMO: the difference in this game was Stafford.
He didn't freak out when pressured and handled it like a pro. His game is being called bad by stats, but he got his team a Win in spite of that.
Hox, he was flatfooted standing behind Olu because he stopped reading the play, locked in on Kupp and had predetermined to launch the ball from where he did. Thats like going into a movie theater with one person sitting in it, sitting behind him and then complaining that you cant see the screen. It is absolutely the job of the qb to not just select a platform and launch. He never looked to Walker. He never looked to JSN. And that is worse than the decision he made for where to throw the ball. The corner was beat by JSN, obviously and immediately. If you are defending him there, then why on gods green earth did he throw it to him on the pick when he was never open on an out in zone coverage, or on the other play where Sam had time and missed 3 other reads to throw to JSN completely covered. Thats why i included the other plays because its not JUST the INTS that he missed on.Really appreciate the great work, but pressure did have some impact on those plays.
Pick #1. This is not a clean pocket with Olu in his lap. It moved him off his spot and caused a backfoot throw.
View attachment 75818
Could he have thrown it a second earlier before Olu fell in his lap? Maybe Walker underneath but that route was still developing. Maybe JSN but even that wasn't exactly wide open at that particular point.
Even in your screen grab, the corner was in JSN's hip pocket and there was safety help over the top:
View attachment 75828
Could he have stepped aside or rolled out to buy more time? Sure but he wouldn't have had to, if Olu wasn't in his lap.
Pick #2. This was a bang bang play, literally right after the snap - he was already in his throwing motion when instant pressure appeared in his face. There was no time to escape the unblocked rusher. Again, pressure.
View attachment 75820
Pick #3 is where he would have the most time to process and make a better decision, but you can't say this was a clean pocket either. Bradford was getting beat by 55 = pressure.
View attachment 75822
Another angle showing the pressure:
View attachment 75823
Pick #4. Pocket collapsed. Three dudes were in his face almost immediately = pressure.
View attachment 75824
In all instances he could have made better decisions, but in nearly all instances there was pressure that impacted these plays.
The thing is, he's a bit of a gunslinger - not exactly hero ball - but he's aggressive trying to make every play count. It's why the offense has been the most explosive this season and he leads the league in yards per pass attempt.
View attachment 75829
He's second in the league in completion percentage:
View attachment 75830
But when you're playing a team that can bring pressure, while playing dime to prevent explosives, sometimes you have to take the check downs or underneath routes - like he did very well at times with Barner in this game. Other times, not so much.
He he did well but my post was about why I thought Sam didn’t play well.
Was Stafford good before he got to the Rams?Yes, we are all aware of Nick Foles.
Darnold is nothing in the history of the NFL until he proves it now. He is clawing to be good. Quite simply: if he doesn't earn it now with the Hawks, where has he earned it?
Exactly my point.Was Stafford good before he got to the Rams?
Stafford was absolutely a good QB before he got to the Rams.Exactly my point.
ETA: Stafford was good in his own mind in Detroit. He became good and accomplished in LA.