I so hope Geno does not disappoint

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,031
Reaction score
1,096
I dont consider Geno 15-20, more like 15 exactly.

I also don’t think it’s easy to find a top 15 qb, so drafting some bum at 17th overall doesn’t excite me like some of you.
😂. More like 25. There arent 17 teams that would take him as a starter.
 
Last edited:

Fresno Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Messages
274
Reaction score
273
Geno is trash, so tired of seeing him. I've said before we know what he is and what we're going to get when he starts. Time to see what Lock can do and if he learned anything by his time sitting for a year.
 
OP
OP
BigBill1945

BigBill1945

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
4,051
Reaction score
969
Geno is trash, so tired of seeing him. I've said before we know what he is and what we're going to get when he starts. Time to see what Lock can do and if he learned anything by his time sitting for a year.
Geno is being what he always has been.......a back up QB. Why are we surprised or maybe not?
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,317
Reaction score
3,845
Geno had a better first half than Lock did last week.

One great throw and he too can be a hero.
Meh neither were good. Geno has to play much better in the second half and he’s capable so hopefully he does
 

Terpdragon

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
288
Reaction score
18
Location
Vancouver, WA
Back to field goals instead of touchdowns with Geno. Holding onto ball too long & off passes. I'm sick & tired of him!
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
Teams Geno would start for if their starter was healthy.

49ers: Purdy
Rams: Stafford
Cards: Murray
HAWKS: Geno (Though Lock should sta rt)

Vikes: Cousins
Lions: Goff
Pack: Love
Bears: Maybe Geno? (Fields is a 1st rounder)

Eagles: Hurts
Coboys: Dak
Giants: Geno
Commies: Howl (Maybe here as well.)

Buccs: Mayfield
Kitties: Young (#1 pick in the draft)
Falcons: Geno
Saints: Carr

Chiefs: Mahomes
Raiders: Geno
Chargers: Herbert
Donks: Wilson

Ravens: Lamar
Browns: Watson & Flacco.
Bengals: Burrow & Browning
Steelers: Geno (Though they have a 1st rdr so not guaranteed.)

Bills: Allen
Pats: Geno
Phins: Tua
Jets: Rodgers

Jags: Lawrence
Texans: Stroud
Colts: Richardson & Minshew
Titans: Levis


Geno is now around the 25th ranked QB in the league. Some teams have backups better than him. Calling him top 15 at this juncture is pure delusion.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
12,009
Reaction score
9,958
Location
Delaware
Teams Geno would start for if their starter was healthy.

49ers: Purdy
Rams: Stafford
Cards: Murray
HAWKS: Geno (Though Lock should sta rt)

Vikes: Cousins
Lions: Goff
Pack: Love
Bears: Maybe Geno? (Fields is a 1st rounder)

Eagles: Hurts
Coboys: Dak
Giants: Geno
Commies: Howl (Maybe here as well.)

Buccs: Mayfield
Kitties: Young (#1 pick in the draft)
Falcons: Geno
Saints: Carr

Chiefs: Mahomes
Raiders: Geno
Chargers: Herbert
Donks: Wilson

Ravens: Lamar
Browns: Watson & Flacco.
Bengals: Burrow & Browning
Steelers: Geno (Though they have a 1st rdr so not guaranteed.)

Bills: Allen
Pats: Geno
Phins: Tua
Jets: Rodgers

Jags: Lawrence
Texans: Stroud
Colts: Richardson & Minshew
Titans: Levis


Geno is now around the 25th ranked QB in the league. Some teams have backups better than him. Calling him top 15 at this juncture is pure delusion.
Out of all of the most irrelevant and misleading ways to evaluate caliber, this is the most bare-assed naked weaksauce I've seen in my life.

Yes, Geno wouldn't start for most teams in the NFL. No one benches their QBOTF for a veteran in the hopes of improving by a few points of passer rating. This methodology of ranking, which you have deployed just now rather than actual passing statistics or evidence-backed film review or other data, has been used specifically to arrive at a lower ranking than warranted by play.

This is the most dogshit way to rank quarterbacks of perhaps all time. It's obviously subject to intangibles and organizational situations instead of raw performance.

Can't we just stick to relevant fact? For once? Or are we going to nakedly cherry pick for the rest of our lives? That's not truth, it's travesty.
 
OP
OP
BigBill1945

BigBill1945

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
4,051
Reaction score
969
Roll out but don't stay in the pocket and get slaughtered. What happened to play action?
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
12,009
Reaction score
9,958
Location
Delaware
There's my proof
I didn't get a good look downfield, but who was open? It looked like all vertical routes (perhaps not straight verts, but vertical in nature) without an especially valid option. I don't think that this qualifies as proof that too many unnecessary, QB-fault sacks are taken by him. He's statistically good at mitigating sacks on the overall scale.
 

Latest posts

Top