Teams Geno would start for if their starter was healthy.
49ers: Purdy
Rams: Stafford
Cards: Murray
HAWKS: Geno (Though Lock should sta rt)
Vikes: Cousins
Lions: Goff
Pack: Love
Bears: Maybe Geno? (Fields is a 1st rounder)
Eagles: Hurts
Coboys: Dak
Giants: Geno
Commies: Howl (Maybe here as well.)
Buccs: Mayfield
Kitties: Young (#1 pick in the draft)
Falcons: Geno
Saints: Carr
Chiefs: Mahomes
Raiders: Geno
Chargers: Herbert
Donks: Wilson
Ravens: Lamar
Browns: Watson & Flacco.
Bengals: Burrow & Browning
Steelers: Geno (Though they have a 1st rdr so not guaranteed.)
Bills: Allen
Pats: Geno
Phins: Tua
Jets: Rodgers
Jags: Lawrence
Texans: Stroud
Colts: Richardson & Minshew
Titans: Levis
Geno is now around the 25th ranked QB in the league. Some teams have backups better than him. Calling him top 15 at this juncture is pure delusion.
Out of all of the most irrelevant and misleading ways to evaluate caliber, this is the most bare-assed naked weaksauce I've seen in my life.
Yes, Geno wouldn't start for most teams in the NFL. No one benches their QBOTF for a veteran in the hopes of improving by a few points of passer rating. This methodology of ranking, which you have deployed just now rather than actual passing statistics or evidence-backed film review or other data, has been used specifically to arrive at a lower ranking than warranted by play.
This is the most dogshit way to rank quarterbacks of perhaps all time. It's obviously subject to intangibles and organizational situations instead of raw performance.
Can't we just stick to relevant fact? For once? Or are we going to nakedly cherry pick for the rest of our lives? That's not truth, it's travesty.