How good will Russell Wilson be in 2013?

SE174

New member
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
0
Location
Spokane
One of the more interesting responses from coach Carroll came when he was asked who he believes will be the Seahawks’ breakout player in 2013. His answer? Quarterback Russell Wilson.

“I think it’s going to be Russell Wilson,” Carroll said. “I think he’s going to really do well this year. He’s going to bust out and will benefit tremendously from his first year. It may be hard to imagine he’s going to get any better, but I think he’s going to get a lot better, being he was a first year starter, first time in the League.”
http://blog.seahawks.com/2013/04/04/pet ... a-session/

Without much of an offseason or preseason's worth of reps to build rapport with his receivers, and despite the restrictor plate Carroll/Bevell imposed on him the first 8 games or so, Wilson had an excellent rookie year. Eighteen games and a full offseason of experience and reps (multiplied by his ridiculous work ethic) should arguably make him better this year, but how much better? What's his ceiling for the 2013 season?

For reference...

2012 Stats:
CMP/ATT: 252/393
CMP%: 64.1
YDS: 3,118
TDS/INT: 26/10
RSH/YDS: 94/489
YPC: 5.2
TDS: 4
QBR/PRT: 69.6/100.0


Side note: Does anyone remember the thread where people were predicting the numbers Russell would put up last year? Is that thread gone for good, or can somebody link to it?
 

The Outfield

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,547
Reaction score
0
Regarding your side note: It appears the forum only retains posts dating back 6 months or less.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,927
Reaction score
2,554
Incrementally better, but noticeably so. He was pretty freaking good last year so better is awesome.

Pete says so too!
 

travlinhawk

New member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
450
Reaction score
0
I would be happy with the same type of performance we witnessed during the last half of the season. If it gets better than that we are in for the ride of our lives...
 

cacksman

New member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
765
Reaction score
0
I think his stats will look something like this:

64%, 3,500, 30/8, 5 rushing.

Needless to say, I will be targeting Wilson in my fantasy football drafts this summer.
 

Tundra

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
617
Reaction score
0
Location
Wasilla/Nome AK
He will have a record setting 2nd season! Book it. Like my kids say, " Russell Wilson is the TRUTH!"
 
OP
OP
SE174

SE174

New member
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
0
Location
Spokane
travlinhawk":29yc97g9 said:
I would be happy with the same type of performance we witnessed during the last half of the season. If it gets better than that we are in for the ride of our lives...

Good point, and I agree. The second half of the season was not only without restrictions on the playbook, but the addition of the read-option. For comparison's sake:


First 8 games
CMP/ATT: 129/210
CMP%: 61.4
YDS: 1,466
TDS/INT: 10/8
RSH/YDS: 36/128
YPC: 3.6
TDS: 0
QBR/PRT: 51.5/84.0


Last 8 games:
CMP/ATT: 123/183
CMP%: 67.2
YDS: 1,652
TDS/INT: 16/2
RSH/YDS: 58/361
YPC: 6.2
TDS: 4
QBR/PRT: 76.3/116.6

So, multiplied by two for a full season we'd be looking at...

2013 Projected:
CMP/ATT: 246/366
CMP%: 67.2
YDS: 3,304
TDS/INT: 32/4
RSH/YDS: 116/722
YPC: 6.2
TDS: 8
QBR/PRT: 76.3/116.6

And that's without factoring in more attempts, which I think we'll see with Russell's knowledge of the playbook and the addition of Percy. I've heard Brock Huard and John Clayton guess about 5-8 more throws per game, which would roughly equate to 80-128 more attempts, 53-86 more completions, 497-806 more yards, and 7-11 more TDs. 8)
 
OP
OP
SE174

SE174

New member
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
0
Location
Spokane
Also, I don't know if it's sustainable, but check out Russell's "CLUTCH" stats from the second half of last year:
88018406918061401040.png

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... son-rg-iii

RIDICULOUS. The more critical the situation, the better he is.
 

QuahHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
5,651
Reaction score
126
Location
Issaquah, WA
I'd guess

3,500yds
35tds
65% completion rate
105 QB rating
500yds rush
3TDs
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
I'd be very happy if he was simply as good as last year. Obviously hoping for significant improvement, but I'm not going to freak out if the stats regress a bit. Making a big jump after a stellar rookie year shouldn't be assumed.

Last five QBs to win ROTY (pre-RG3): Newton, Bradford, Ryan, Young and Roethlisberger.

  • Newton and Roethlisberger stagnated statistically in their second year (some would say they played worse, few would say better).
  • Bradford and Ryan actually played worse in their sophomore seasons.
  • Young was surprisingly the only one to show improvement, but he also had the worst rookie year (statistically) of the five.
 

themunn

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
4,037
Reaction score
644
SE174":29ebmxz1 said:
travlinhawk":29ebmxz1 said:
I would be happy with the same type of performance we witnessed during the last half of the season. If it gets better than that we are in for the ride of our lives...

Good point, and I agree. The second half of the season was not only without restrictions on the playbook, but the addition of the read-option. For comparison's sake:


First 8 games
CMP/ATT: 129/210
CMP%: 61.4
YDS: 1,466
TDS/INT: 10/8
RSH/YDS: 36/128
YPC: 3.6
TDS: 0
QBR/PRT: 51.5/84.0


Last 8 games:
CMP/ATT: 123/183
CMP%: 67.2
YDS: 1,652
TDS/INT: 16/2
RSH/YDS: 58/361
YPC: 6.2
TDS: 4
QBR/PRT: 76.3/116.6

So, multiplied by two for a full season we'd be looking at...

2013 Projected:
CMP/ATT: 246/366
CMP%: 67.2
YDS: 3,304
TDS/INT: 32/4
RSH/YDS: 116/722
YPC: 6.2
TDS: 8
QBR/PRT: 76.3/116.6

And that's without factoring in more attempts, which I think we'll see with Russell's knowledge of the playbook and the addition of Percy. I've heard Brock Huard and John Clayton guess about 5-8 more throws per game, which would roughly equate to 80-128 more attempts, 53-86 more completions, 497-806 more yards, and 7-11 more TDs. 8)

I say 2nd half of the season +10% in all stats, so something like:

2013 Projected:
CMP/ATT: 280/400
CMP%: 70%
YDS: 3,600
TDS/INT: 36/5
RSH/YDS: 130/850
YPC: 6.5
TDS: 10
QBR/PRT: 76.3/120.6

Just kept the QBR the same because feck knows how that works.
That would be pushing for the single-season passer rating record, which I think Wilson should be pushing for this year anyway, so sounds reasonable to me
 

jewhawk

New member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
556
Reaction score
0
His efficiency numbers (Y/A, Comp%, Rating, etc.) will probably be about the same as last year with the exception that I think his INT% will be lower next year, but he will do it on more attempts so his counting numbers (Yards, TDs, DYAR, etc.) will be higher.
 
OP
OP
SE174

SE174

New member
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
0
Location
Spokane
One thing I'm fairly confident about after watching him in the second half of the season, is that this year he'll have 30+ TDs, and less than 10 INTs.
 

SalishHawkFan

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,872
Reaction score
0
Last year Wilson faced 13 of the top 16 defenses in his 18 games. He faced a top 10 defense 9 times.

Looking at the upcoming schedule, of course we don't know where those defenses will rank when it's all done, but based upon where they ended up on FO's defensive rankings last year, he's projected to face 10 top 16 defenses all season and 7 of the top 10. That's still a tough schedule, but a little better than what he faced the year before. Considering he's got a year under his belt and will get the reps this offseason and has been studying, it's safe to say we should see improvement on the order of, say +20%.

3600 yds. 31 TD's/ 9 INT's
 

Lady Talon

New member
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
757
Reaction score
0
DavidSeven":9lfkgsr3 said:
I'd be very happy if he was simply as good as last year. Obviously hoping for significant improvement, but I'm not going to freak out if the stats regress a bit. Making a big jump after a stellar rookie year shouldn't be assumed.

Last five QBs to win ROTY (pre-RG3): Newton, Bradford, Ryan, Young and Roethlisberger.

  • Newton and Roethlisberger stagnated statistically in their second year (some would say they played worse, few would say better).
  • Bradford and Ryan actually played worse in their sophomore seasons.
  • Young was surprisingly the only one to show improvement, but he also had the worst rookie year (statistically) of the five.

You realize that all the QBs you listed were:

  • selected in the first round, as opposed to height bias alone dropping them to the 3rd or later.
  • with the exception of RG3 and Newton, given lavish contracts.
  • not discounted in the ORotY voting.
  • given their starting jobs, rather then required to win it over a seemingly superior and definately higher paid veteran.
  • not required to weather some 8 weeks of vanilla offensive plays that limited their effectiveness and made defense jobs easier.
  • hyped as the salvation of their franchise before they ever took a snap.

Russell Wilson is closer to the Tom Brady mold then to any of the QBs you listed. He has a lot driving him and the will to prove it over the golden children.
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
Lady Talon":27gmm59v said:
DavidSeven":27gmm59v said:
I'd be very happy if he was simply as good as last year. Obviously hoping for significant improvement, but I'm not going to freak out if the stats regress a bit. Making a big jump after a stellar rookie year shouldn't be assumed.

Last five QBs to win ROTY (pre-RG3): Newton, Bradford, Ryan, Young and Roethlisberger.

  • Newton and Roethlisberger stagnated statistically in their second year (some would say they played worse, few would say better).
  • Bradford and Ryan actually played worse in their sophomore seasons.
  • Young was surprisingly the only one to show improvement, but he also had the worst rookie year (statistically) of the five.

You realize that all the QBs you listed were:

  • selected in the first round, as opposed to height bias alone dropping them to the 3rd or later.
  • with the exception of RG3 and Newton, given lavish contracts.
  • not discounted in the ORotY voting.
  • given their starting jobs, rather then required to win it over a seemingly superior and definately higher paid veteran.
  • not required to weather some 8 weeks of vanilla offensive plays that limited their effectiveness and made defense jobs easier.
  • hyped as the salvation of their franchise before they ever took a snap.

Russell Wilson is closer to the Tom Brady mold then to any of the QBs you listed. He has a lot driving him and the will to prove it over the golden children.

None of these things you mentioned has any bearing on determining future performance. All I said was that making a huge jump after putting up a stellar rookie campaign shouldn't be assumed, which is supported by recent history. I'm a huge fan of Wilson, but I worry about people putting unrealistic expectations on him. If he put up the exact same numbers for the next decade he'd still go down as the greatest Seahawks QB in history.
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
Lady Talon":1ixr9qft said:
Russell Wilson is closer to the Tom Brady mold then to any of the QBs you listed. He has a lot driving him and the will to prove it over the golden children.
Also: Tom Brady's completion percentage, passer rating, and W/L record were all worse as a second year starter.

My point: I'm totally confident that over time, RW is going to go down as one of the best this game has seen, but people shouldn't freak out if his numbers stay steady for a year or are even a little worse. Dude's already playing at a Top 5 QB level.
 
Top