Ad Hawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 3,211
- Reaction score
- 432
If the QB crop isn't as solid this year, and our bright and shiny new pick #9 won't garner as high a value (reaching) for a QB, what draft pick would you say is worth giving up for a QB? Many of you will no doubt say "none this year." But some of you might jump on it with Ridder, Corral, or others. But if you take a QB who isn't stellar, why sacrifice that pick that could be used on a position of need in a deep draft at other positions?
As a reminder, here are the picks>>>
If the need at QB is to replace Russ--which will be difficult in many ways--there probably isn't even a prospect worth taking. But if the someone with less overall skill would do, what pick would you be willing to give up, gambling on such a QB?
Would you give pick 40 or 41?
Pick 72?
After that, you're not likely even getting someone who would start over Lock.
As a reminder, here are the picks>>>
- Round one, number 9 overall (in trade from Broncos)
Round two, number 40 overall (in trade from Broncos)
Round two, number 41 overall
Round three, number 72 overall
Round four, number 107 overall
Round five, pick 151 overall
Round five, pick 152 overall (in trade from Broncos)
Round seven, pick 227 overall
If the need at QB is to replace Russ--which will be difficult in many ways--there probably isn't even a prospect worth taking. But if the someone with less overall skill would do, what pick would you be willing to give up, gambling on such a QB?
Would you give pick 40 or 41?
Pick 72?
After that, you're not likely even getting someone who would start over Lock.