cymatica
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,280
- Reaction score
- 4,158
what about Graham in the redzone or at the goal line. That's where most of the criticism comes from
cymatica":1izbybb4 said:what about Graham in the redzone or at the goal line. That's where most of the criticism comes from
Mase":1gu8eyer said:--
-- Actually, an observation from the live game first, get off the "we don't use Graham right" mantra. If you could see the game live you would realize how ignorant it is. Yes, sometimes he stays in to help block, or at least starts with a chip, but believe me, the Cards were paying a lot of attention to 88. There bracketing of Graham is why our WRs were getting so many one on ones, and why Baldwin absolutely owned Peterson in the second half.
-- But to the replay. George Fant played very well..... except against Chandler Jones. Unfortunately, he faced Jones probably 80% of the game. Make no mistake, Jones played him like a fiddle. He unleashed all the classics, speed rush, inside spin, hand slap, lung and dig. Truth be told, you have to expect that to an extent, right? He isn't Walter. However, he is athletic, and usually doesn't make the same mistake twice. I was actually very optimistic about him even after this game. He needs to see more, before he can be more.
-- Oh, and P.S. I'm still IN.
LoneHawkFan":m9uz2ymw said:cymatica":m9uz2ymw said:what about Graham in the redzone or at the goal line. That's where most of the criticism comes from
He gets doubled on virtually every route. When he isn't doubled, he gets his share of targets.
Against the Cardinals there were 4 TD passes to 4 different players.mrt144":ws4keoj8 said:LoneHawkFan":ws4keoj8 said:cymatica":ws4keoj8 said:what about Graham in the redzone or at the goal line. That's where most of the criticism comes from
He gets doubled on virtually every route. When he isn't doubled, he gets his share of targets.
I didn't realize that a double team on Graham could so thoroughly destroy our red zone conversion rates distributed among all our other receivers.
LeftHandSmoke":qmpcsbin said:Against the Cardinals there were 4 TD passes to 4 different players.mrt144":qmpcsbin said:LoneHawkFan":qmpcsbin said:cymatica":qmpcsbin said:what about Graham in the redzone or at the goal line. That's where most of the criticism comes from
He gets doubled on virtually every route. When he isn't doubled, he gets his share of targets.
I didn't realize that a double team on Graham could so thoroughly destroy our red zone conversion rates distributed among all our other receivers.
Does it matter that Graham didn't instead get all 4 and the rest none?
LeftHandSmoke":uqz9dhdj said:Against the Cardinals there were 4 TD passes to 4 different players.mrt144":uqz9dhdj said:LoneHawkFan":uqz9dhdj said:cymatica":uqz9dhdj said:what about Graham in the redzone or at the goal line. That's where most of the criticism comes from
He gets doubled on virtually every route. When he isn't doubled, he gets his share of targets.
I didn't realize that a double team on Graham could so thoroughly destroy our red zone conversion rates distributed among all our other receivers.
Does it matter that Graham didn't instead get all 4 and the rest none?