Falcons vs Cards.

ringless

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
1,978
Reaction score
0
rideaducati":8db9i0uo said:
ringless":8db9i0uo said:
I've said all along Stanton is a horrible qb. However losing your starting QB and pro bowl #1 WR certainly has a big part of why this team is falling. We overcame the losses on defense but those other two are too much. Had we still had Palmer I think we win the divison. At this point we could miss the playoffs

Think whatever you need to to make yourself feel better. The cards rank way too low in offense and defense to have the best record in the NFL legitimately. Even when Palmer was in there.


Yet that same cardinals team was averaging more points per game for and less against than Seattle. So what does that mean?
 

MidwestHawker

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
0
Location
Indianapolis
ringless":sf6103kp said:
rideaducati":sf6103kp said:
ringless":sf6103kp said:
I've said all along Stanton is a horrible qb. However losing your starting QB and pro bowl #1 WR certainly has a big part of why this team is falling. We overcame the losses on defense but those other two are too much. Had we still had Palmer I think we win the divison. At this point we could miss the playoffs

Think whatever you need to to make yourself feel better. The cards rank way too low in offense and defense to have the best record in the NFL legitimately. Even when Palmer was in there.


Yet that same cardinals team was averaging more points per game for and less against than Seattle. So what does that mean?

Retroactive trash talk. An interesting concept...
 

Tundra

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
617
Reaction score
0
Location
Wasilla/Nome AK
MidwestHawker":2a8hr4kk said:
Nice job of saving all of your timeouts for absolutely nothing, Mike Smith. I hope you get an Ace of Base song stuck in your head for the rest of your life you moron.
WOW! That is incredibly horrible and mean!! AWESOME!
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
ringless":38726dki said:
rideaducati":38726dki said:
ringless":38726dki said:
I've said all along Stanton is a horrible qb. However losing your starting QB and pro bowl #1 WR certainly has a big part of why this team is falling. We overcame the losses on defense but those other two are too much. Had we still had Palmer I think we win the divison. At this point we could miss the playoffs

Think whatever you need to to make yourself feel better. The cards rank way too low in offense and defense to have the best record in the NFL legitimately. Even when Palmer was in there.


Yet that same cardinals team was averaging more points per game for and less against than Seattle. So what does that mean?

It means that Seattle was playing against better teams both offensively and defensively.
 

ringless

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
1,978
Reaction score
0
MidwestHawker":1aliel63 said:
ringless":1aliel63 said:
rideaducati":1aliel63 said:
ringless":1aliel63 said:
I've said all along Stanton is a horrible qb. However losing your starting QB and pro bowl #1 WR certainly has a big part of why this team is falling. We overcame the losses on defense but those other two are too much. Had we still had Palmer I think we win the divison. At this point we could miss the playoffs

Think whatever you need to to make yourself feel better. The cards rank way too low in offense and defense to have the best record in the NFL legitimately. Even when Palmer was in there.


Yet that same cardinals team was averaging more points per game for and less against than Seattle. So what does that mean?

Retroactive trash talk. An interesting concept...

I'm not talking trash. I'm the first to admit when my team is playing bad. However this game is not over yet and the division is up for grabs. I was simply stating that the cardinals were a much better team before losing their starting qb and #1 wr. I felt we could overcome the losses on defense but offense was already average and that was a death sentence.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
Msfann":38z5f23e said:
Atlanta should have challenged that.

Tough position for Smith. Not the brightest of HCs as it is. Had it not been a punting situation, I think you absolutely challenge but that's not one that gets over turned with any degree of frequency. Nice toss by Ryan and now we're glad they have that time out in their pocket. ; )
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
30,246
Reaction score
5,956
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
ringless":1rkumudr said:
MidwestHawker":1rkumudr said:
ringless":1rkumudr said:
rideaducati":1rkumudr said:
ringless said:
I've said all along Stanton is a horrible qb. However losing your starting QB and pro bowl #1 WR certainly has a big part of why this team is falling. We overcame the losses on defense but those other two are too much. Had we still had Palmer I think we win the divison. At this point we could miss the playoffs

Think whatever you need to to make yourself feel better. The cards rank way too low in offense and defense to have the best record in the NFL legitimately. Even when Palmer was in there.


Yet that same cardinals team was averaging more points per game for and less against than Seattle. So what does that mean?

Retroactive trash talk. An interesting concept...

I'm not talking trash. I'm the first to admit when my team is playing bad. However this game is not over yet and the division is up for grabs. I was simply stating that the cardinals were a much better team before losing their starting qb and #1 wr. I felt we could overcome the losses on defense but offense was already average and that was a death sentence.

Better team before they woke up with a
"Seattle Hangover"

:{)
I'm talking trash.
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
Ted Ginn with three catches. More than he caught in his entire time with the whiners.
 
Top