hgwellz12
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 8,929
- Reaction score
- 4,031
I think it's totally a case by case basis. Generally, I would prefer that the game resumes after all appropriate medical attention is administered.
The only reason to suspend a game IMO is some catastrophic event that impacts everyone in the stadium, and maybe everyone in the city. Lightning storm with ground strikes approaching, earthquake, terrorist attack, tornado warning, that sort of thing.
But only in the immediate vicinity, and only for the duration of the threat. After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the NFL suspended games for three or four weeks. The immediate danger had passed, and the country was in desperate need of a distraction, and they should have kept playing after the first week, for the good of the country.
Somebody getting injured on the field during play? Get him to the nearest hospital and continue the game.
I’m hopeful this was just extra caution for pre-season games and not a norm for the regular season.
It creates an expectation and learned behavior.It was done in the preseason. In the grand scope of things these games really don't matter. I doubt they will end games in the regular season for these situations early. Unless it's absolutely catastrophic.