He didn't want to keep playing under Carroll's conservative scheme. He would've played the rest of his career with the Seahawks had they adapted an offense that better suited his skill set.
I'm of the feeling that the Seahawks will be kicking themselves when it's all said and done. Trading their franchise QB still in his prime, despite his faults that are now amplified by his doubters, for unknown commodities.
These two paragraphs, as I stated, boil down to perspective. The part about an offense that is better suited to his skill set is a major disconnect. As I have shown in videos posted here, Wilson has been throwing the same routes since his days at NC State. It continued in Wisconsin and it just rolled on into Seattle. He will be throwing the same routes with Denver. It is the way he wants to play.
As far as the second paragraph, I will ask again to the people who think Wilson is in his prime (never got an answer the first time), what exactly have you seen from his play the past two seasons that make you think he is in his prime?
Am I happy that he is gone? Yes. He had become a bigger locker room problem than he was when the more vocal leaders were complaining that Pete was not holding him accountable when Carroll was holding others accountable.
Do I think we won the trade? Obviously.
Do I think that we should have chosen him over Carroll? Yes. However, there is a caveat to that. Wilson wants to determine who we sign. The players he has openly lobbied for should not have been signed. The funny thing is that several posters have pointed out that our offense was always top ten and that we were putting money into the defense. Why would we try to improve upon our strength making our weakness worse?