amill87
New member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Messages
- 1,374
- Reaction score
- 0
Well Wilson has as many rings as Brees, Rodgers, and Manning. So short answer, I don't care if he is ever "elite" in the pocket.
Thaihawk":26ipznpo said:He has plenty of room to improve on the short to intermediate timing throws. I believe he was last in the league for holding the ball at over 3.5 seconds. This seems like one of the most difficult things for a quarterback to master and I am sure he is being told by Pete to pass on the riskier throws until they absolutely need them.
That being said he has elite accuracy and play-making ability outside of the pocket and he is an elite runner as a QB. The national folks tend to disregard these abilities for the ability to surgically take apart a team with quick throws... which is dumb.
JMR":3373es87 said:If the question is whether RW is an elite *pocket passer* then the answer is NO, not yet. He has the tools to get there though. It takes a few years to get there, and it's possible our approach on offense will keep many from labeling him as an elite passer if the volume stats don't get there. But look at his passer rating, ypa, and TD:INT, and it's right there with all the other "elite" passers.
Exactly. He has elite metrics. Why RW will NEVER be seen as elite by some is because of several factors:brimsalabim":bewu6kc0 said:good point sailor. I was watching a replay of an NFL AM show from Tuesday and they were " re ranking the young QB's " Eric Davis was really the only one that had Russell's back. They had 1 Luck, 2. Cap 3. Newton. 4 RG3 and were split between Russell and Tannehill. Eric Davis spoke up and asked the question "what more exactly does Russell Wilson need to do in order to catch up to these guys?"
You could ask them same question here with respect to being a pocket passer. People want to discount Russell because he has a great team around him but I can't think of a superbowl that was won by a QB on a bad team.
So the question Eric Davis is really asking is are we actually asking Russell to perform at an even higher level than the guys he is being compared to just to be equal? It's like he is being graded on a reverse curve. He some how carries a handy cap? Manning, Brady, Montana, Favre, Aikman or Elway didn't win super bowls without having talent around them to help get it done.
davidonmi":5ym6z42o said:it depends on what you consider a great pocket passer, he will always struggle throwing it between the hashes, but has a great arm.
I think he is a top 6-8 QB in the NFL and a top ten pure pocket passer.
Depends on what you consider elite, I would still take Rodgers, Brady, Manning, Brees, and maybe Luck over him
Err, Uh..nevermind. :mrgreen:Sarlacc83":2acpgvyb said:This OP is spot on. If Russell gets to the elite realm, I bet we win the Super Bowl!
Penman96":x5dc3s7g said:Russ isn't an elite anything yet, he has a lot to learn about being an NFL QB. Carroll certainly expects a lot more progress.
About being a pocket passer, I think he can be great in the pocket but excellent outside of the pocket as well. He'll want to maintain the threat of scrambling. It seems like the days of the true NFL pocket passer are numbered, QB's like Wilson offer more options.