glenwo2
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2025
- Messages
- 6,436
- Reaction score
- 7,461
So the Pats, Ravens, and the Raiders are the teams he had most of his sacks against.
Predicting a 65% drop to 8 sacks is one example.Track, how we are "convincing ourselves" that Garrettand Donaldwon't present significant challenges?
Not speaking for anyone here but I personally feel that AD won't be as much an impact player as others believe and are worried about.
The real threat is going to be Myles.
He would've had a significant fall-off just due to wear-and-tear and age.Predicting a 65% drop to 8 sacks is one example.
You have two HOF bound players, first ballot for AD, and a season that will likely decide if MG makes it on his first ballot.
They aren’t to be taken lightly, despite their age.
AD retired before he had a significant fall off, making comparisons to other players difficult. Before he retired he was the most double teamed player. Last season, I believe Garrett was. That’s going to be a problem for many teams. Not so much the Hawks, who presumably will expand on their pass out of a heavy set philosophy this year.
I think the best argument against the addition of these players being a game changer is that it is simply adding strength to strength. It’s much harder to improve on your strengths than it is to improve on your weaknesses.
In that regard, the addition of McDuffie likely does more to increase the effectiveness of the line than does the addition of either MG or AD.
Yeah...F that team that everyone is already crowning the greatest NFL team ever assembled.F the Rams. It's that simple.
The SEAHAWKS are the champs, and they don't fear anyone. We heard all this crap last year about the almighty Rams, how'd that turn out?