Grading John's Drafts

Seahawker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
4,044
Reaction score
1,907
I have tried to be impartial during this exercise, it is very much subjective and may contain unseen variables to arrive at a conclusion.
Example-
The 2011 draft of KJ Wright (R-4) & Sherman (R-5) was knocked down to a A- because neither Carpenter (R-1) or Moffitt (R-3) became an OL solution.

2010 9 picks A
Russell Okung
Earl Thomas
Golden Tate
Kam Chancellor

2011 9 picks A-
KJ Wright
Richard Sherman

2012 10 picks A
Bruce Irvin
Bobby Wagner
Russell Wilson

2013 11 picks F+
Luke Wilson

2014 9 picks D-
Paul Richardson
Justin Britt

2015 9 picks B
Frank Clark
Tyler Lockett

2016 10 picks D+
Jarran Reed

2017 11 picks C-
Chris Carson
Ethan Pocic
Shaquill Griffin

2018 9 picks D+
Will Dissly
Michael Dickson

2019 11 picks C-
DK Metcalf

2020 8 picks D
DeeJay Dallas

2021 3 picks F+
Stone Forsythe

2022 9 picks A
Charles Cross
Boye Mafe
Kenneth Walker lll
Abe Lucas
Coby Bryant
Riq Woolen

So far 2023 is an A and 2024 is a solid B with potential to turn into an A.

From 2010 to 2024 John had 136 total draft picks resulting in 38 notable starters for a 28% hit rate.
Average success rates would be considered to be-
30% good.
32% great.

Two observations.
1) John's 28% draft success rate does not factor in draft picks he traded for vet players. Re-calculating that factor would likely put JS in the 30- 32% range.
2) I can not prove or disprove, but I believe John's trade downs have been neither overly good or bad. I see them as a wash, neutral.

Of active GM's, John shines in one important category, percentage of drafting Pro Bowlers. He ranks 3rd best with a 14.58 hit rate, with only Mickey Loomis 14.60 and Jerry Jones 14.72 ranked higher. Rick Smith (Texans) is #4 at 12.33 and it soon starts to fall into the 9-10 range after the top ten and less successful down the line.

Some perspective:
One study found that only 32% of drafted players from 2012 to 2020 were considered major contributors. Another study suggested a "Bust" rate as high as 37%.

There is no definitive evidence, but after some investigation I feel these are reasonable odds of finding solid starters in each round.

1st 55%
2nd 35%
3rd 20%
4th 15%
5th 10%
6th 5%
7th 3%

One number that cross my path suggested that drafting an average of 2.3 solid starters per draft would be considered a success.

Upon arriving in Seattle John nailed his first three drafts resulting in a Super Bowl win. He then went on a near decade slide (2013- 2021) that could be attributed to many things. -Low draft slatings, weak player pools, poor scouting/grading, ect.

JS now in 22', 23' and 24' has returned to his earlier form, boosted by his cache of draft picks from the RW3 trade.
During our 2014 & 2015 Super Bowl appearances John was a consensus top 5 GM. That has fallen to about a #10- 14 rating because of his 8 year draft drought, recent lack of playoff wins and inability to maintain a servicable offensive line.
John's rating has been buoyed by his early roster building success, the teams consistent win % and his ability to find Pro Bowlers.

Obviously John's biggest flaw has been his failure to maintain a functional OL, specifically devaluing IOL.
I also think trading down & away from talent & diluting drafts are another possible negative. QB scouting and taking more draft shots on them could be improved upon.

I like John and think his war- room has been on the upswing the last couple of years. That said, I think it is imperative that JS fixes this OLine this offseason if he wants to continue to be viewed as a top GM in this league.

It is very difficult to pin- point an overall grade for John other than to say his first 3 years and his last 3 years as Seattle's GM have been straight A's. This is an incredible accomplishment in this league but you have to couple that with an 8 year stretch of below average & failing grades from 2013 to 2021. Hopefully that sample was an anomaly and will not recur.

This evaluation has been subjective and I have tried to be unbiased throughout. It may contain inaccuracies and opinion that may not be credible.
 
Last edited:

Wsumatt1982

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
1,528
Very nice write up. I think a lot of the 8 years of failures had to do with Pete having more say than normal and drafting for Need instead of BPA. JS takes the heat for sure, but he has openly said he get away from drafting BPA and now has recently come back around to that approach. I can't wait for next weekend. It should be fun.
 

Chukarhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,088
Reaction score
2,773
I have tried to be impartial during this exercise, it is very much subjective and may contain unseen variables to arrive at a conclusion.
Example-
The 2011 draft of KJ Wright (R-4) & Sherman (R-5) was knocked down to a A- because neither Carpenter (R-1) or Moffitt (R-3) became an OL solution.

2010 9 picks A
Russell Okung
Earl Thomas
Golden Tate
Kam Chancellor

2011 9 picks A-
KJ Wright
Richard Sherman

2012 10 picks A
Bruce Irvin
Bobby Wagner
Russell Wilson

2013 11 picks F+
Luke Wilson

2014 9 picks D-
Paul Richardson
Justin Britt

2015 9 picks B
Frank Clark
Tyler Lockett

2016 10 picks D+
Jarran Reed

2017 11 picks C-
Chris Carson
Ethan Pocic
Shaquill Griffin

2018 9 picks D+
Will Dissly
Michael Dickson

2019 11 picks C-
DK Metcalf

2020 8 picks D
DeeJay Dallas

2021 3 picks F+
Stone Forsythe

2022 9 picks A
Charles Cross
Boye Mafe
Kenneth Walker lll
Abe Lucas
Coby Bryant
Riq Woolen

So far 2023 is an A and 2024 is a solid B with potential to turn into an A.

From 2010 to 2024 John had 136 total draft picks resulting in 38 notable starters for a 28% hit rate.
Average success rates would be considered to be-
30% good.
32% great.

Two observations.
1) John's 28% draft success rate does not factor in draft picks he traded for vet players. Re-calculating that factor would likely put JS in the 30- 32% range.
2) I can not prove or disprove, but I believe John's trade downs have been neither overly good or bad. I see them as a wash, neutral.

Of active GM's, John shines in one important category, percentage of drafting Pro Bowlers. He ranks 3rd best with a 14.58 hit rate, with only Mickey Loomis 14.60 and Jerry Jones 14.72 ranked higher. Rick Smith (Texans) is #4 at 12.33 and it soon starts to fall into the 9-10 range after the top ten and less successful down the line.

Some perspective:
One study found that only 32% of drafted players from 2012 to 2020 were considered major contributors. Another study suggested a "Bust" rate as high as 37%.

There is no definitive evidence, but after some investigation I feel these are reasonable odds of finding solid starters in each round.

1st 55%
2nd 35%
3rd 20%
4th 15%
5th 10%
6th 5%
7th 3%

One number that cross my path suggested that drafting an average of 2.3 solid starters per draft would be considered a success.

Upon arriving in Seattle John nailed his first three drafts resulting in a Super Bowl win. He then went on a near decade slide (2013- 2021) that could be attributed to many things. -Low draft slatings, weak player pools, poor scouting/grading, ect.

JS now in 22', 23' and 24' has returned to his earlier form, boosted by his cache of draft picks from the RW3 trade.
During our 2014 & 2015 Super Bowl appearances John was a consensus top 5 GM. That has fallen to about a #10- 14 rating because of his 8 year draft drought, recent lack of playoff wins and inability to maintain a servicable offensive line.
John's rating has been buoyed by his early roster building success, the teams consistent win % and his ability to find Pro Bowlers.

Obviously John's biggest flaw has been his failure to maintain a functional OL, specifically devaluing IOL.
I also think trading down & away from talent & diluting drafts are another possible negative. QB scouting and taking more draft shots on them could be improved upon.

I like John and think his war- room has been on the upswing the last couple of years. That said, I think it is imperative that JS fixes this OLine this offseason if he wants to continue to be viewed as a top GM in this league.

It is very difficult to pin- point an overall grade for John other than to say his first 3 years and his last 3 years as Seattle's GM have been straight A's. This is an incredible accomplishment in this league but you have to couple that with an 8 year stretch of below average & failing grades from 2013 to 2021. Hopefully that sample was an anomaly and will not recur.

This evaluation has been subjective and I have tried to be unbiased throughout. It may contain inaccuracies and opinion that may not be credible.
This is good stuff, the only nit to pick would be that those drafts were John and Pete's drafts up until 2 years ago. Pete ran the show and had final say in player personnel.
 

RehireMora

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2025
Messages
76
Reaction score
73
It's a what have you done for me lately league. And lately, JS has made decisions worthy of losing his job.

Let's be real, what was that Defense ranked last year? Top 10? The Seahawks had more offensive weapons then they needed and would have been a playoff team if it wasn't for 1 reason...JS.

Completely neglecting O-Line issues will be his legacy, when it should have been the Super Bowl win. He screwed himself
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,707
Reaction score
925
I can see it as a fair assessment. I do have a question tho... Do you plan on doing these assessments on other teams for the same timeframe? That would be interesting as well.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
Very nice write up. I think a lot of the 8 years of failures had to do with Pete having more say than normal and drafting for Need instead of BPA. JS takes the heat for sure, but he has openly said he get away from drafting BPA and now has recently come back around to that approach. I can't wait for next weekend. It should be fun.
The super ardent Pete fans hate this but multiple people have alluded to it and Bumpus even talked about it and then decided he didn’t want to say anything.
 

Kamcussionator

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
760
Reaction score
1,179
Location
San Diego, CA
Nice post. It does make one think.

One factor I've not heard addressed is that when PCJS got here our roster was crap, so it would make sense a lot of draftees would make the roster. From our SB year on, our roster was loaded, so it would make sense not many guys would make the team let alone crack the starting lineup.

That could be a contributing factor to our draft 'slump' from 2013 on. I remember those years as a time when we'd waive guys only to see them get snapped up to start on lesser teams.

Another factor that made me nuts is we kept drafting OL in the 20-teens that had a flaw in their game (typical for college to pro transitioning players), but never got over the hump. Like we'd have a guy that was good in pass pro, but couldn't run block; and his replacement was a mauler in the run game, but a turnstile in pass pro. We had 3-4 position dilemmas like that for probably 5 years and nobody ever stepped up to win the job and lock down the position.

Idk if that was coaching or what. A few of our OL went other places and had pretty good careers, which makes me believe the talent was there. It just never clicked while they were here.
 

Atradees

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
4,129
Reaction score
346
Location
Ich tu dir weh
It's a very good post. John has done so poorly but we are always relevant. It's frustrating. If we fired John and got the Eagles or 9ers personnel team....would we be better? ThevRams always have amazing players via the draft as do the 9ers. Yet we are always competitive and right there. Except the games we wiff on. What is the separation metric? Will McDonald create a new identity in spite of John?
 
Last edited:

Azvacar

Active member
Joined
Mar 7, 2025
Messages
162
Reaction score
169
2011 9 picks A-
KJ Wright
Richard Sherman


But

2015 9 picks B
Frank Clark
Tyler Lockett


was This YOUR Ranking.. or a draft ranking.. by ESPN and Chat GPT?

As 2011 should include
Byron MaxwelL and a few others who tacked on that starter percentage etc
 
Last edited:

Azvacar

Active member
Joined
Mar 7, 2025
Messages
162
Reaction score
169
YearNotable PicksStarter RatePro BowlersGrade
2010Earl Thomas, Russell Okung, Golden Tate, Kam ChancellorHigh3A
2011Richard Sherman, K.J. Wright, Byron Maxwell, Malcolm SmithHigh2A
2012Russell Wilson, Bobby Wagner, Bruce IrvinHigh2A+
2013Luke WillsonLow0F
2014Justin BrittModerate0D+
2015Tyler Lockett, Frank ClarkModerate2B
2016Jarran Reed, Germain IfediModerate0C
2017Shaquill Griffin, Chris CarsonModerate1C+
2018Michael Dickson, Will DisslyModerate1C
2019DK MetcalfModerate1B
2020Damien Lewis, Jordyn BrooksModerate0C
2021Tre BrownLow0C-
2022Tariq Woolen, Kenneth Walker IIIHigh1B+
2023Jaxon Smith-NjigbaHigh1B+
2024TBDTBDTBDIncomplete
 

Hollandhawk

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
955
YearNotable PicksStarter RatePro BowlersGrade
2010Earl Thomas, Russell Okung, Golden Tate, Kam ChancellorHigh3A
2011Richard Sherman, K.J. Wright, Byron Maxwell, Malcolm SmithHigh2A
2012Russell Wilson, Bobby Wagner, Bruce IrvinHigh2A+
2013Luke WillsonLow0F
2014Justin BrittModerate0D+
2015Tyler Lockett, Frank ClarkModerate2B
2016Jarran Reed, Germain IfediModerate0C
2017Shaquill Griffin, Chris CarsonModerate1C+
2018Michael Dickson, Will DisslyModerate1C
2019DK MetcalfModerate1B
2020Damien Lewis, Jordyn BrooksModerate0C
2021Tre BrownLow0C-
2022Tariq Woolen, Kenneth Walker IIIHigh1B+
2023Jaxon Smith-NjigbaHigh1B+
2024TBDTBDTBDIncomplete
FYI 2023 is wrong. Witherspoon is missing and he is a 2X pro bowler. Is this AI?
 
Last edited:

Azvacar

Active member
Joined
Mar 7, 2025
Messages
162
Reaction score
169
FYI 2023 is wrong. Witherspoon is missing and he is a 2 pro bowler. Is this AI?
FYI 2023 is wrong. Witherspoon is missing and he is a 2X pro bowler. Is this AI?
Based on what.... metric??? again? uhhhh what??? The basis was starter rate.... you do grasp his position in the first 2 years right? The table is based on Starter rate and those with the highest starter rate being pro bowlers as the first poster was going for... Witherspoon was amazing for us.. but in those first year was NOT considered that in a metric regardless of how well he performed..... this is basic statistics FYI

ALso.. its not listing pro bowlers PER year? but who made a the pro bowl the YEAR they were drafted......... are we not on the same page?
 

Hollandhawk

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
955
Based on what.... metric??? again? uhhhh what??? The basis was starter rate.... you do grasp his position in the first 2 years right? The table is based on Starter rate and those with the highest starter rate being pro bowlers as the first poster was going for... Witherspoon was amazing for us.. but in those first year was NOT considered that in a metric regardless of how well he performed..... this is basic statistics FYI

ALso.. its not listing pro bowlers PER year? but who made a the pro bowl the YEAR they were drafted......... are we not on the same page?
Okay, I guess I'm just misunderstanding the sheet. So the one pro bowler is Witherspoon, but he isn't mentioned by name because he wasn't considered a starter or performing good enough based on a certain metric? I'll just stay confused.
 

Azvacar

Active member
Joined
Mar 7, 2025
Messages
162
Reaction score
169
Okay, I guess I'm just misunderstanding the sheet. So the one pro bowler is Witherspoon, but he isn't mentioned by name because he wasn't considered a starter or performing good enough based on a certain metric? I'll just stay confused.
He didnt hit the "starter rate" as he was a ton in the slot and situational... granted he was amazing... but if we hit the Metric of "starter percentage" he didn't hit that

Yes... its dumb as heck but... I was just going on the original posters metrics is all
 

BirdsCommaAngry

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
1,418
Reaction score
310
As far as 3 year drafting stretches go, what is JS and PC's competition for the best stretch ever?
 

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,988
Reaction score
2,349
I can not prove or disprove, but I believe John's trade downs have been neither overly good or bad. I see them as a wash, neutral.

Trade downs tend to be a wash which is why the Seahawks and Patriots that in recent history did a lot of trade downs did not yield that much better draft results if they stuck with their draft slotting and drafting BAP if you examine the last ten years.

Trade down advantage is to replenish lost picks for teams that lack draft choices in the first place or need cost effective depth. But teams are more likely to turn to UDFA in a cap crunch like the Bucs and Rams have done the last few years to add depth and fill out a roster.
 

Latest posts

Top