What's your outcome if Geno replaced Hurts in Philly?

Would Philly be better or worse with Geno

  • Significantly Better

  • Slightly Better

  • Significantly Worse

  • Slightly Worse

  • The Same


Results are only viewable after voting.

OrangeGravy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
1,396
Reaction score
527
How much better or worse or not at all, would Philly's offense be with Geno vs Hurtz?
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,371
Reaction score
6,505
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
I don't think Hurts has been super impressive this season, so probably about the same.

They arent in the Super Bowl two years ago with that switch though. And we definitely make the playoffs last year with Hurts, while making a deeper run the year prior.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201
Not sure how any QB would fair in Philly with the injuries and talent level they have/had at the WR positions. Let's face it, without Brown they are pretty much helpless most of the times.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,109
Location
SoCal Desert
The better way to phrase the question could be: "Would you trade Geno for Hurts?" I suspect most 12s on dot net would vote yes.

To most on dot net, Geno lost or never won over their hearts and minds, to those folks, Geno is and will always be that glorified backup. When Geno had a really good game, those folks would pinch their noses and praise, when Geno struggled, celebration time with champagnes.

I liken that to stepmom syndrome, lol, she will never be as good as your mom and you will her to fail.
 

GetNjigbaWithIt

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
2,790
Reaction score
3,651
Location
Central Valley, CA
The better way to phrase the question could be: "Would you trade Geno for Hurts?" I suspect most 12s on dot net would vote yes.

To most on dot net, Geno lost or never won over their hearts and minds, to those folks, Geno is and will always be that glorified backup. When Geno had a really good game, those folks would pinch their noses and praise, when Geno struggled, celebration time with champagnes.

I liken that to stepmom syndrome, lol, she will never be as good as your mom and you will her to fail.
You're not my mom, Gina! 😅

Screenshot 2024 11 22 12 58 24 82 e4424258c8b8649f6e67d283a50a2cbc
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
Worse. Hurts is a good QB and the threat of him running helps Barkley and they lose their short yardage advantage.
 

Chukarhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,088
Reaction score
2,773
The better way to phrase the question could be: "Would you trade Geno for Hurts?" I suspect most 12s on dot net would vote yes.

To most on dot net, Geno lost or never won over their hearts and minds, to those folks, Geno is and will always be that glorified backup. When Geno had a really good game, those folks would pinch their noses and praise, when Geno struggled, celebration time with champagnes.

I liken that to stepmom syndrome, lol, she will never be as good as your mom and you will her to fail.
Wanting Geno to fail is crazy. Never been a big Hurts guy, BUT he would probably outperform Geno with this ghastly 0line. Toss up for me and Geno is way cheaper. Leaning Mr. middle of the road Geno.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,109
Location
SoCal Desert
Worse. Hurts is a good QB and the threat of him running helps Barkley and they lose their short yardage advantage.
If Hurts is better, how about our 2nd round pick and Geno for Hurts?
 

Appyhawk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Messages
4,631
Reaction score
2,537
Location
Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montan
Hurts would teach our guys the toosh push and as a result we would have more rushing TDs, AND at least one more 4th down conversion.
Philly might have a few more deep shot completions than they do but would be giving up a much more productive ground game from the QB position.
The thing about Geno running for us is I worry about him surviving the punishment.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,109
Location
SoCal Desert
Hurts would teach our guys the toosh push and as a result we would have more rushing TDs, AND at least one more 4th down conversion.
Philly might have a few more deep shot completions than they do but would be giving up a much more productive ground game from the QB position.
The thing about Geno running for us is I worry about him surviving the punishment.
Geno and our first for Hurts and their 2 second?
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
they aren’t that close. Hurts is much better. First half of 22 Geno was better. Every thing since then is Hurts by quite a bit.
 

CouchLogic

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
1,069
Reaction score
1,404
Slow week? Why waste timme thinking about this? We going to do this for every team or what?

I hate fantasy football/madden GM BS [lol].
 
OP
OP
OrangeGravy

OrangeGravy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
1,396
Reaction score
527
Slow week? Why waste timme thinking about this? We going to do this for every team or what?

I hate fantasy football/madden GM BS [lol].
It's a good way to get people to reveal themselves
 

Latest posts

Top