AZ_fan":1vdrea9h said:CallMeADawg":1vdrea9h said:I watch RedZone every week (unless Seattle is on) and I use Game Pass to catch up on the games I miss. I'm aware that Gurley is playing well, I am also aware that the rest of St. Louis' offense is hot garbage.
AP was held to nothing by Seattle. I don't know if you see this in your responses, but you continually make some excuse for how Seattle's performance is diminished when you talk about the games they have played.
I did notice that you skipped over the question someone asked you about what happened when Minnesota nearly beat you at home? Were they better than mediocre for that one night that they played you?
Not making excuses I'm just wondering why the media is crowning them after wins over Pitt, Minnesota and Baltimore with Cleveland and St. Louis coming up. There is no doubt that Seattle is playing 1000 % better than they were... you don't have to be a fan to see that.
But are they back to SB caliber as one of your own posted upthread? Time will tell.
As for the other question... I already answered it. Scroll up.
Any given Sunday? Like the Lions game? ... and I never said Minnesota was mediocre... I said average. Mediocre would be Chicago, Detroit, Dallas, SF and Baltimore.
You'll have to explain to us what the difference is between mediocre and average, in your head. Considering the two are basically synonyms for one another, you can understand where we are confused.
And I love how you call Minnesota a "Teddy Bridgewater led" team in an effort to diminish them. If I were to call them an "Adrian Peterson led" team, does that increase their value?