Sgt. Largent":3db7qdqo said:
Basis4day":3db7qdqo said:
My hope is that they stop tinkering with different players and different positions to get a single unit getting 1st team reps as soon as possible. As long as they keep shuffling players there is zero chance to solidify the line. And this is before injuries.
That's what everyone wants,
but the fact that there isn't a solid starting 5 tells us that players aren't stepping up to take command of the line positions.
Pete and Cable aren't just going to draw straws on a starting 5, guys have to earn the spots..........and as we saw Friday night, these guys are a LONG ways from earning the positions.
What surprised me is that the supposed locked positions like Britt and Sweezy looked like hot garbage. Those weren't suppose to be question marks.
I get that. But if there isn't a ton separating the different players then it's not like they're going to rotate o-lineman all year as if they were the D-Line because there all equally talented (Or awful). Eventually they need to make a choice on who the starters are.
I got the impression during camp that they were attempting to see where to play Glowinski, Poole and Sokoli long term and at the same time having a battle for center. It seemed like they were evaluating players as players rather than evaluating the starting line as a whole. If that makes sense.
I have a hard time believing it would have been as ugly if Okung, Baily, Lem, Sweezy and Britt had been getting all the reps. Even if a different player is better long term.
This goes against "Always Compete" and i understand that. For all the benefits of this mantra is is definitely one of the drawbacks.