toffee
Well-known member
fade deserves his days in the sun, he has been criticizing our Hawks' lack of blitzes or stunts for years. He earned it.
I gave credit to Hurtt calling plays up in the booth, with Birdseye view and away from the guys, may be he needed those extra seconds to think instead of interacting?Another great post by Fade. The typical fans coming out bashing him after he spent the time to write that up for us is disappointing. Still not sure why that type of behavior not only keeps happening but is allowed to keep happening.
Their aggressive stunts and blitzes were timed perfectly by Hurtt. The Giants are awful, but our guys feasted when they should have. Love to see it.
Keep up the great work Fade
It took me awhile to come around to understand what he was saying, but now it makes sense. Fade is very intelligent and accurate, and has been all along. I refused to acknowledge the Truth.Another? Ok...........
It's fairly rare.
Indeed. Good note.Fade said they blitzed or stunted on 10 of 11 sacks, that doesn't mean blitzed on all but one. Stunting does not equal blitzing.
My worry would be, is they only dialed up this much pressure due to the Giants playing with a backup O-Line.My only objection is that this isn't the case of Seattle suddenly coming around to playing a particular style. They built the defense to blitz more from the secondary. Pete talked about it a lot last offseason. And the reason we haven't seen it this season is because we did not have the personnel due to injuries.
Curious, what narrative are you talking about?I do find it interesting. I’ve advocated for being more aggressive. I looked forward to Fade’s posts until a couple years ago. Nothing against him, just not what I see a lot of the time. And then change the narrative. All good. I’m not sure if I’ve ever quoted Fade or replied to him directly until now. Insight is good. Thanks nano.
And it’s sure fun to watch from a fan’s standpoint!Great post, Fade. I agree 1000%