hawkfan68
Well-known member
Sgt. Largent":1bnlcoyz said:hawknation2017":1bnlcoyz said:NJlargent":1bnlcoyz said:SoulfishHawk":1bnlcoyz said:Not like Pete had a lot to work with. Kind of incredible that this team could be sitting at 10 wins after Sunday. Minus some incredible players. That's a lot to ask of ANY coach in the league. And Pete clearly has been the most successful coach in team history.
Not sure I agree. We have an incredible defense (even injured) and a top 5 QB. We are in a division with 2 free wins against SF and 2 more (should anyway) against the Cards. That means go 6-6 in remaining games and hit 10 wins with that defense and QB. Not exactly HOF material. Of course add Marshawn and you get a boost to 12-13.
We had a down year without question. Let’s see if there’s improvement next year. That’s objective evidence of a good coach. Many coaches can take generational talent to the top or near it. Likewise many can’t overcome injuries. Let’s see where Carroll takes us next year and reevaluate
It's very circular because we have a solid defense (in the face of injuries to Chancellor, Sherman, Avril, etc.) because of Pete Carroll. Players like Byron Maxwell have played much better under our coaching staff than they have anywhere else.
On the defensive side of the ball. What offensive player has Pete elevated?
No one's criticizing Pete's defensive prowess as a head coach, it's what he's ALWAYS done best. Those of us that are criticizing him aren't happy with what he's done on offense..............from the continued O-Line debacle, to the run game, to under utilizing Graham until now, to relying on his QB to make plays and not having any assemblence of an identity on the offensive side of the the ball.
The saying is "you're only as strong as your weakest link". So what would you say is the weakest link on offense? That part has hardly changed over the past few years. Yes, players have changed but the weak philosophy hasn't. That is the issue. I've seen a lot of excuses for the offensive coaches but ask this...if you were a coach on a team where the head coach handicaps you, why would you stay on? Bevell and Cable have more input on the offense that is being run than they are getting credit for. They are given more rein is why the offense is an abject failure. Remember in the past seasons, Pete would step in after 8 or 10 weeks and suddenly the offense would click. This hasn't happened this season but it seemed to be an annual event since 2015. It would be nice if Pete found coaches that can be productive with the offense he likes to run from game 1....Cable and Bevell are not it. That's the weakness here. That's what keeps holding Pete down. It's not my intention to turn this into Cable/Bevell thread but those guys are what is preventing Pete from being the top NFC coach in my opinion.