theENGLISHseahawk":1zxqpkyh said:Cartire":1zxqpkyh said:Sources...
Anonymous informants. Unverifiable facts. Remember when King and Mort reported about the Rice Tape back in April... Sources.
You can literally say whatever you want, and no one can say you are lieing because of sources. And if someone asked for proof, you say you have to "protect" your source.
So easy to be a sports journalist today.
Of course it's sources.
Any sports journalist who named his source wouldn't get any information for the rest of their career.
We're not talking about some schmuck here -- it's Mort. This is legit.
OMG, it's MORT!!!! LOL GIve me a break.
My problem with this story is that in order for this story to be legit, the "sources" have to be from the Seahawks front office. OK, so why would someone in the Seahawks front office tell any reporter this information, knowing that it could damage team chemistry?
This is the way I look at any "anonymous source" story. I ask, "What is the motive for the anonymous source to say this stuff to a reporter?" If I cannot think of a legit motive, then I have to question the truthfulness of the reporting. And right now, I cannot think of any reason a Seahawks front office person would say this to a reporter, and I can think of all sorts of reasons nobody in Seahawks front office would say anything like this to a reporter. And I don't care if it's MORT, Steve Kelly, or Art Thiel. If their anonymous source sounds fishy, then their story is fishy too.
And BTW, lots of folks don't expect Lynch to be back next year. That would not exactly be earth-shattering, and it's something VERY easy for any reporter to report, and just imply that he had a front office source.