Seahawk_Dan
Well-known member
Geno is being the player that everyone has known for the last ten years.
Never, according to way too many people in this thread.When does it become Geno's fault?
Never, depending on who you ask.When does it become Geno's fault?
Yeah it was all Geno's fault.. yeah your not the guy... LOL
LTH
You can't make chicken salad out of chicken...Never, depending on who you ask.
I think the better and far more construction way to put it however is this;
Geno Smith is not a good QB, let alone great. He is, at his best, average. Sometimes average is enough, but when you're not average you're bad and he was bad today. However, it is the jobs of the coaching staff to help your QB into the best situations, especially when they lack talent. Waldron and Carroll did not do Geno any favors at all. Their lack of game planning, adjustments, and putting too much faith in Geno's arm got that man slaughtered out there and will continue to hurt him.
It's not over yet. If they were going to lose a game, losing to the Ravens in their house, that's the one to lose.That's an awful lot of mind-reading and projection. Lol.
No. My eyes tell a different story. The biggest issue for Seattle was/is the offensive line. While they did an admirable job early in the season at masking those deficiencies, they've been abysmal lately. We can't run block or pass block consistently. Our offense has gone from Geno, the complementary piece, to Geno, the centerpiece. And Geno's not that guy. If we're relying on him to carry the offense when our RBs are averaging under 2 yards per carry and he's getting pressured on 60% of his dropbacks, we're screwed. There's no way around it.
The Seahawks are 5-3. NOT you.Alright. We're 5-3.
I like your takes and agree with you on most things, but the "don't use 'we' when referring to the team you root for" argument is specious at best. I'm the biggest grammar Nazi on this forum, and even I think it's dumb to take it literally that someone means they are PART of the team by using the word "we" when referring to the Seahawks in some capacity.The Seahawks are 5-3. NOT you.
Against the Commanders and Rams, better be. But that Rams team embarrassed Seattle Week 1, so 6-4 more likely.Meh. We will be 7-3 in two weeks. Book it.
Predictions with no consequences, my favorite. How about putting something on the line?Meh. We will be 7-3 in two weeks. Book it.
Pete also made the mistake that the team has two starting caliber QB on the roster, basically implying that anyone of them could start at anytime if need be.Pete is hurting the Seahawks by protecting Geno the same way he helped ruin RW by protecting him from any criticism or consequences of poor play. NOT putting Lock in WAS protecting Geno because if Lock only looked half as awful as Geno today the fans would be even louder in calling for a change at QB position. But when you are "Pete's Pet" you don't give the back-up a look or even plan for the future by DRAFTING a QB.
Pete is hurting the Seahawks by protecting Geno the same way he helped ruin RW by protecting him from any criticism or consequences of poor play. NOT putting Lock in WAS protecting Geno because if Lock only looked half as awful as Geno today the fans would be even louder in calling for a change at QB position. But when you are "Pete's Pet" you don't give the back-up a look or even plan for the future by DRAFTING a QB.