I take strong issue with that. Yes the Vikings were hit with some bad calls, but to suggest that 21 of the 30 points they lost by was due to that simply stands reality on it's head. It's non-sense. At best, I'd say that a touchdown of Seattle's margin of victory was due to poor officiating and it DEFINITELY did not rise to the level of "being bent over". Go ask a Lion's fan what it's like to really be bent over by officiating.
Edit: Reading it again, I see you aren't saying that so my apologies. I still think that 10 points is too much to give to poor officiating and does not constitute being 'bent over'. In my mind 'being bent over' constitutes officiating so bad and blatant that it changes the outcome of a game. {See the phantom face-mask on Aaron Rodgers against the Lions.}
Edit: Reading it again, I see you aren't saying that so my apologies. I still think that 10 points is too much to give to poor officiating and does not constitute being 'bent over'. In my mind 'being bent over' constitutes officiating so bad and blatant that it changes the outcome of a game. {See the phantom face-mask on Aaron Rodgers against the Lions.}