chris98251
Well-known member
Jackson will not be a returner, he is here for depth, receiving ability and third downs while a possible blocking back if paired in the backfield with Lynch, we have plenty of return guys on this team.
He played in tandem with Marshawn so yes but it isn't his strong suit unless we're doing run look but passing or pass look but intend to run.A-Dog":29u6y2pd said:Can Jackson fill in at fullback?
Yeah!! Let's get a fat one for Freddy's finger!pmedic920":1iolvknb said:http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/13585250/seattle-seahawks-fred-jackson-agree-one-year-deal
Throwdown":2vrt0nhi said:I'm trying to like this, I really am but it's hard.
I get you don't like his comment, and I don't like the fact he sees an age and doesn't consider the actual miles, but those are our opinions, and he has his (even if it's not very well thought out). That's what this board is about.Laloosh":zr16m1wv said:Bob loblaw":zr16m1wv said:Firstly , that was straight funny and the point had a ton of value. JS invested a 2nd round pick in C-Mike an just acknowledged that they are giving up on him by signing an over the hill RB, who was injured a lot. If CM was good enough they could have waited on Turbin with Michael holding down the backup. The RB situation just got very interesting, marshawan is the rock but everyone else just fell off around him. It's now time for the Seahawks to look for the back of the future again. C-Mike is not it. That is a post of value.
You started posting like, night of the super bowl and I haven't seen a post from you that wasn't a knock on Seattle. Nice to be able to be critical, right? If it's your only reason for being here, do us a solid and stop.
Plenty of things to criticize but you're obviously here to antagonize.
MizzouHawkGal":3oh60ar0 said:He played in tandem with Marshawn so yes but it isn't his strong suit unless we're doing run look but passing or pass look but intend to run.A-Dog":3oh60ar0 said:Can Jackson fill in at fullback?
Basically he's here to catch passes and pass block because unlike Turbin he breaks tackles much like Marshawn and that's deadly if you're a good outlet receiver like him especially in off schedule scramble plays.
Though he can still run so given the choices at hand he's probably the best backup for Marshawn that is realistically available.
Blitzer88":2bjjlwyj said:We when from: Lynch, Turbin and Michael to Lynch, Jackson and Rawls. I don't know how I feel about this, I mean Jackson is a good player, but he is 34 and will have to learn the playbook on the fly.
Simple works if you have Lynch, Lockett, Graham, Jackson and Wilson. It's just like our defense just line up and beat us if you can before we exploit all those wonderful mismatches.marko358":x4dftb6d said:Blitzer88":x4dftb6d said:We when from: Lynch, Turbin and Michael to Lynch, Jackson and Rawls. I don't know how I feel about this, I mean Jackson is a good player, but he is 34 and will have to learn the playbook on the fly.
According to most on this board, Bevell's playbook is pretty simple.