MizzouHawkGal":wfiemfm5 said::thcoffee:
Yeah, you sip your coffee but I know how you got your post count that high, double poster!
More on topic, does this mean we have to keep Coleman?
MizzouHawkGal":wfiemfm5 said::thcoffee:
Just watching Laloosh, you and ScottM gave good advice and well.....it's under control.Laloosh":dq8s3k8o said:MizzouHawkGal":dq8s3k8o said::thcoffee:
Yeah, you sip your coffee but I know how you got your post count that high, double poster!
More on topic, does this mean we have to keep Coleman?
I think your niners have much bigger holes to fill than the Hawks do. You may want to focus on them??Bob loblaw":2ll1x6mh said:Firstly , that was straight funny and the point had a ton of value. JS invested a 2nd round pick in C-Mike an just acknowledged that they are giving up on him by signing an over the hill RB, who was injured a lot. If CM was good enough they could have waited on Turbin with Michael holding down the backup. The RB situation just got very interesting, marshawan is the rock but everyone else just fell off around him. It's now time for the Seahawks to look for the back of the future again. C-Mike is not it. That is a post of value.
NewJerseyHawk":3pv1ctwn said:The worse case long term scenario for this is.
A) Marshawn does his thing again, goes for another 1300+ yards and wins a Super Bowl and retires.
B) Fred Jackson does his thing again, goes for 700 yards and wins his first Playoff games and gets a ring and retires.
C) You are left with either Turbin or Michael running the ball next year, in their contract year, where their value would be highest. If either had a decent year this year, they would be running for a big contract in 2016.
D) Worse case short term is Lynch isn't 100% this year and Michael or Turbin have a big season and immediately looking for a pay day next year, without Rawls on the roster.
I would rather have cost certainty on Rawls and another back in 2016 vs rolling the dice that they (Turbin or Micheal) get their acts together.
Don't forget the intagibles. Like being a leader, great teammate and locker room presence much like Kam...hmm...I wonder if that wasn't a factor in his signing?Overseasfan":3e8p7tmm said:Good blocking, pass catching, lots of experience, synergy with Marshawn and is a very physical runner. Amazing guy to have as a RB2.
akseahawkfan":3ifyq900 said:A thirty four year old running back? Seriously? Hope it's for the Veteran minimum with the discount on the salary cap.
Trolling is illegal. Watch out ninny fan.Bob loblaw":3w3oxpey said:Of Course I troll, I'm a Niner fan, second I can say my troll is pretty light, let's not get so sensitive. The point I made is very valid and a comparison to yesterday's criticism of tube Niners having older players in the roster. The isn't a position player that shows his age faster than RBs, it's a huge risk signing an a very clear statement that C-Mike is a bust. Just as LaMichael James was. Sorry but RB don't get time to develop. You either have it or you don't .
That's the spirit! Don't let us get away with too much. Keep leaning on that rudder to straighten us out.Bob loblaw":2no9d0lk said:Then I am not a troll, I am an arch rival who like to add some flavor to his post. Yea a little trash talk but go through every post I've ever made. Never a curse word or vulgar post. That is a troll. Bob Loblaw continues on
Bob loblaw":3db1oww9 said:tube Niners .
hawkfan68":4thqow8c said:Isn't Fred Jackson a dangerous return guy too? Huge double threat on kickoff returns to have Lockett and Jackson back there. A huge problem for an opposing team if they can't kick it out of the end zone.