brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
Bob Stitt
Sark spent a year as QB coach for the Raiders in 2004. that's not a ton of experience, but he technically does have some.DavidSeven":31ixfg8r said:In spite of Pete's new age-y ways, he actual places a big emphasis on prior NFL experience. He's said in the past that this was the primary thing that dictates whether college coaches can make a successful jump to the pros. That being the case, I don't see him hiring a college OC without first making them cut their teeth as a NFL position coach. Sark is a hot-mess right now, and he also doesn't have the experience. IMO, you absolutely cannot hand him an NFL OC job at this point. In this regard, Kiffin is actually a more realistic candidate (if Bevell did leave for BYU or a NFL HC job) because of his time in Oakland, his prior dealings with Cable, and the fact that his life seems to be in reasonable order. More likely though, it would be an internal promotion or else someone out there who has previously worked in the NFL.
Some of us were not laughing at you, but at your posts. Still are laughing at said posts. 8)Siouxhawk":nexz2lr1 said:You laughed at me 4 weeks ago. Now it becomes even more apparent to me that he is being groomed to be Pete's successor whenever he feels it's time to call it a career. And that would be a good choice.
Siouxhawk":38my476g said:Perfect time to give Bev a contract extension.
Thread winner right there. :th2thumbs: ^^^^ 8)Kamcussion":1wxjit7j said:He seems to be at his best when Russell is improvising or calling an audible...
Receiver Doug Baldwin said he was happy to hear Bevell won’t be leaving.
“It would be a big, big hole to fill if Darrell left,” Baldwin said. “The thing about Darrell Bevell is that he knows everybody’s strengths and weaknesses and has tailored the offense to accommodate those strengths and weaknesses. So whatever the perception is on the outside he’s done a fantastic job with giving us opportunities to be successful.”
Rob12":30r9hc7w said:I wrote out a public apology to Kam, and I should probably do the same for Darrell Bevell.
I've never been one to scream, "Fire Bevell!" after a rough offensive performance. I readily admit that it's been a tough go of it to forgive him for the last play of last year's Owl. But when you look at the stills of that play, frame by frame, the play was there. The touchdown was there. It wasn't a TERRIBLE play call, and it's time I resigned myself to that fact. If it was perfectly executed by the players, we win that game.
My feeling is, be careful with "the grass is greener" mindset. I don't think it would be. Bevell knows our players inside and out, and he knows their strengths and their weaknesses. I'm not a Tom Cable detractor either, but I think that Bevell has been severely limited by a young, inexperienced, and poor pass protecting line. That's going to limit what you can do.
It would be hypocritical of me to blame him for the offense's shortcomings, yet not praise him for how out of our minds our offense has been over the past month. I mean, weighted DVOA, No. 1? Are you kidding me?
Glad that Bevell has put his head coaching aspirations on hold for the time being. And some serious props to Pete if he put a stop to that distraction. Pete's No. 1 obligation is to the team, and the last thing this team needs is its offensive coordinator interviewing for jobs elsewhere. The timing ISN'T right, just as Pete and Bevell said, and that's because of the team.
And wow at Doug's comments. We've been barking up the wrong damn tree for too long. I mean, he could have said nothing at all, or dressed it up a different way. But it seems to me he went out of his way to give Bevell some serious props. That means something.
Siouxhawk":35rdkeur said:You laughed at me 4 weeks ago. Now it becomes even more apparent to me that he is being groomed to be Pete's successor whenever he feels it's time to call it a career. And that would be a good choice.
He never has done that. Just reading comprehension gone awry and making a mountain out of a molehillolyfan63":2ok5louq said:Siouxhawk":2ok5louq said:You laughed at me 4 weeks ago. Now it becomes even more apparent to me that he is being groomed to be Pete's successor whenever he feels it's time to call it a career. And that would be a good choice.
Only if he can get a handle on throwing players under the bus.
Like with Lockette. Like stop doing it and man up and take responsibility.
Tho, ya never know, maybe it's a style thing, and HE can get away with it. But it's not how Pete runs the show now, for sure.
Siouxhawk":2rnnif3q said:You laughed at me 4 weeks ago. Now it becomes even more apparent to me that he is being groomed to be Pete's successor whenever he feels it's time to call it a career. And that would be a good choice.
Well realistically I wasn't suggesting it would be tomorrow. But 3 or 4 more years of absorbing Pete's knowledge and style and he could be the man to make a seamless transition.McGruff":1mxhu4ec said:Siouxhawk":1mxhu4ec said:You laughed at me 4 weeks ago. Now it becomes even more apparent to me that he is being groomed to be Pete's successor whenever he feels it's time to call it a career. And that would be a good choice.
I like Bevell as an OC, but that would be worse than going from Holmgren to Mora.
Sports Hernia":3d3847hq said:Thread winner right there. :th2thumbs: ^^^^ 8)Kamcussion":3d3847hq said:He seems to be at his best when Russell is improvising or calling an audible...