Jimjones0384
New member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
- Messages
- 819
- Reaction score
- 0
He will be good for around five sacks, maybe even more. I love this addition, he is a beast. I am hoping for a career resurgence.
vin.couve12":1mcij0ub said:Just thought of something really important (that's actually not).
How much is Clem going to pay Marsh for #91? And does Marsh take Irvin's old number?
Hawkfan77":2h89i0yx said:Good signing. Cant understand the level of animosity some are showing towards this signing other than "he not JJ Watt, he not good!"
ThisTorontoHawk":dyox8t89 said:Hawkfan77":dyox8t89 said:Good signing. Cant understand the level of animosity some are showing towards this signing other than "he not JJ Watt, he not good!"
He does not bring anything to the team, his career has past him, he will not make the team and if he does that does not look good for the rest of the D line.
You are an evil man. :laugh:Hasselbeck":3gqy62ij said:vin.couve12":3gqy62ij said:Just thought of something really important (that's actually not).
How much is Clem going to pay Marsh for #91? And does Marsh take Irvin's old number?
#80 is open. I mean granted Jerry Rice would have to sign off on it, but he seems like a stand up guy so doubt it'd be an issue.
Tech Worlds":1ixsbu91 said:ThisTorontoHawk":1ixsbu91 said:Hawkfan77":1ixsbu91 said:Good signing. Cant understand the level of animosity some are showing towards this signing other than "he not JJ Watt, he not good!"
He does not bring anything to the team, his career has past him, he will not make the team and if he does that does not look good for the rest of the D line.
lol It would have been better to have Jerry eat a bowl of Ds and not play here at all than to sacrifice that number.Hasselbeck":6jndm93h said:vin.couve12":6jndm93h said:Just thought of something really important (that's actually not).
How much is Clem going to pay Marsh for #91? And does Marsh take Irvin's old number?
#80 is open. I mean granted Jerry Rice would have to sign off on it, but he seems like a stand up guy so doubt it'd be an issue.
Tech Worlds":3p6hbjur said:Great! We signed an old dude!
We might as well sign worthless journeyman Red Bryant. Let's get the band back together!
HawkFan72":2al7c0dm said:Tech Worlds":2al7c0dm said:Great! We signed an old dude!
We might as well sign worthless journeyman Red Bryant. Let's get the band back together!
I know you're being sarcastic, but Red was a part of the D-line in Arizona last year and that team went further than the Hawks did.
Just because they aren't starters anymore doesn't mean they can't have a role.
HawkFan72":20f3yg3b said:Tech Worlds":20f3yg3b said:Great! We signed an old dude!
We might as well sign worthless journeyman Red Bryant. Let's get the band back together!
I know you're being sarcastic, but Red was a part of the D-line in Arizona last year and that team went further than the Hawks did.
Just because they aren't starters anymore doesn't mean they can't have a role.
This. :13: John is a master at covering his contingencies before the draft. I like Clemons and I think he could contribute in a spot duty role for a season if necessary. Any time you can get a 5 sack guy on the cheap it's kind of a no-brainer. If we draft somebody who beats him out, nothing lost.Mistashoesta":2kxdjvj2 said:There are multiple reasons Seattle may have chosen to sign the old war horse. One of them possibly being that with the draft rapidly approaching, having 25 other teams select in front of you can limit your possibilities of getting a particular player you want if they have an idea of what holes you still need to fill that weren't done with in house re signings or free agency.