All Time - Career Passer Rating

[Anthony!]

Russell Wilson on the year now:

Yds 2723

Y/G 247.5

TD 18

QBRat 102.9

Yeah something is wrong, ESPN is all messed up here they are from NFL

Passing Statistics
Player Att Comp Yds Comp % Yds/Att TD TD % INT INT % Long Sck Sack/Lost Rating
Russell Wilson 352 241 2997 68.5 8.5 21 6.0 7 2.0 80 38 205 106.2


So he has 2997 yards, 21 tds, 106.2 QB rating, 249.75, YPG, 68.5 Complt%, 8.5 YPA

Oh and 450 rushing yards, 5.2 ypa and 1 td

http://www.nfl.com/player/russellwilson ... areerstats

 

[Smellyman]

Russell Wilson on the year now:

Yds 2723

Y/G 247.5

TD 18

QBRat 102.9

Those are before the Viking game

 

[jkitsune]

Russell Wilson on the year now:

Yds 2723

Y/G 247.5

TD 18

QBRat 102.9

ESPN doesn't update until the next day. Doesn't include today's game.

 

[theincrediblesok]

Russell Wilson on the year now:

Yds 2723

Y/G 247.5

TD 18

QBRat 102.9

That stat isn't updated after the Vikings game, below is after.

passing yards 2997

Yards/Game 249.75

TD 21 INT 7

QBR 106.2

 

[Pandion Haliaetus]

Wilson's as others probably have already projected but to lazy to read is on pace for:

4,000 pass yards, 28 tds
600 rush yards, 1-2 tds
10 ints.

With 68.5 Comp% and 106.5 PassRtg.

If he reaches those stats... thats some MVP shit right there. Yet no one is going to give him much credit or talk about how much his O-Line sucked in the first half of the season, or getting by without Lynch and now Graham. How in all 5 of the Seahawks losses they had 4th QTR leads only for the D to give them up. Or that the offense is consistently disabled by penalties whether they are legit, ticky-tack, or phantom. This team could be 9-3, 10-2 on a couple of plays, breaks, luck. DVOA says they are that good. Elo says they are that good.

No one will talk about it. Not as much as the other guys. Not as much as Newton.

But I think Wilson will do better than those averages. Thats is just a base line. Going off μμhis 3 week performance averages within reason ofcourse, Wilson ends the season with:

5,000 Total Yards
--> About a 310 ypg average in last 5 gms
--> About 250-270 pass yards/40-60 rush yards

36 Total TDs/ 9 Ints
--> 11-13 passing TDs + 1-3 rushing TDs
--> 4:1 Ratio

70% Comp Pct. & 108.0+ QB rating
--> 4 straight 11+ win seasons
--> 4 straight Play-Off appearances

He'll shut EVERYONE up with those numbers but still be an afterthought for MVP. However...





Russell Wilson (In February)
--> 3 straight Superbowl appearances
--> SB 50 Most Valuable Player
--> 2 Super Bowl Wins

 

[Maulbert]

It reads like a greatest QBs of all time list. Excluding RW from the list, the Top 10 looks like this.

01 Aaron Rodgers (future HoF)
02 Tony Romo
03 Steve Young (HoF)
04 Tom Brady (future HoF)
04 Peyton Manning (future HoF)
06 Philip Rivers (borderline HoF?)
07 Drew Brews (future HoF)
08 Ben Roethlisberger (future HoF)
09 Kurt Warner (HoF)
10 Joe Montana (HoF)

8 of 10 are, or will be in the HoF.

1 is a borderline HoF'er in Philip Rivers.

1 is a long shot at HoF status in Tony Romo, and maybe the only outlier. MAYBE. He still has some years left.

...but ...but teh Passer Rating doezn't matter gyze. lolz

Kurt Warner isn't in the Hall of Fame.

 

[Rob12]

Russell Wilson on the year now:

Yds 2723

Y/G 247.5

TD 18

QBRat 102.9

Yeah something is wrong, ESPN is all messed up here they are from NFL

Passing Statistics
Player Att Comp Yds Comp % Yds/Att TD TD % INT INT % Long Sck Sack/Lost Rating
Russell Wilson 352 241 2997 68.5 8.5 21 6.0 7 2.0 80 38 205 106.2


So he has 2997 yards, 21 tds, 106.2 QB rating, 249.75, YPG, 68.5 Complt%, 8.5 YPA

Oh and 450 rushing yards, 5.2 ypa and 1 td

http://www.nfl.com/player/russellwilson ... areerstats

Should be 500 rushing yards!

106.2... Damn.

No other QB in the league who I'd rather have. Not a one.

 

[hawknation2015]

Passer rating basically boils down to TD/Int ratio. It is kind of a cool list. A lot of those guys are really aggressive and can maintain a high passer rating. I think those are where you're talking about the elite of the elite.

It's an interesting question. Would we prefer Russell's rating to be a little bit lower in exchange for being a bit more aggressive in terms of the windows he is willing to throw the ball into?

I would think for these stats to be meaningful, they would include a weighting system. So for example, a completion for a touchdown with the time run out on the clock to win the game should be worth way more than a first down toss for a gain of 2 yds in the first quarter. Baseball stats include this very important minutiae.
I suspect a filter like this would separate the wheat from the chaff and Russel Wilson would be near the top of this 'elite of the elite' list.

It's that kind of thinking (manipulating objective measures with subjective preferences) that got us ESPN's nonsense Total QBR, where Russell is currently ranked behind the great Brian Hoyer.