Wilsons Wonderlic?

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
Peyton Manning and Drew Brees also scored 28 on their Wonderlic exams. Good company.
 

BlueTalon

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,219
Reaction score
2,045
Location
Eastern Washington
kidhawk":1mexuvoz said:
And to further my point, you can't judge a book by it's cover, or any single word or sentence. You have to take the entirety of the book into account.
Not true. (Necessarily.) You can tell a lot about a book if the cover has unintentionally bad spelling or grammar, bad artwork, or if the author's bio shows he(she) is a moron. Most bad books I have ever experienced didn't get read in their entirety.

But that actually reinforces your greater point:

"Basically my point is that most (if not all) really stupid people do crappy on the wunderlic, but not all people who do poorly on the wunderlic are stupid."


(or maybe not, but I agree with your point anyway.)
 

bellingerga

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,323
Reaction score
2
Location
Beaverton, Oregon
http://walterfootball.com/draftwonderlic.php

Wow Fitzpatrick scored a perfect 50? not bad beardy mcgee.

But yeah, I think it's quite obvious it didn't matter what Russell scored on this test. To anyone with eyes and a brain, he is a great QB, and protects the ball nicely. Makes great decisions. Incredible athlete. Don't give a damn about his score on a test that really doesn't matter.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
24,961
Reaction score
5,100
Location
Anchorage, AK
BlueTalon":3o02ltu1 said:
kidhawk":3o02ltu1 said:
And to further my point, you can't judge a book by it's cover, or any single word or sentence. You have to take the entirety of the book into account.
Not true. (Necessarily.) You can tell a lot about a book if the cover has unintentionally bad spelling or grammar, bad artwork, or if the author's bio shows he(she) is a moron. Most bad books I have ever experienced didn't get read in their entirety.

But that actually reinforces your greater point:

"Basically my point is that most (if not all) really stupid people do crappy on the wunderlic, but not all people who do poorly on the wunderlic are stupid."


(or maybe not, but I agree with your point anyway.)

:laugh:
 

chrispy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
1,444
highest score ever on a per foot of height basis.
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,974
Reaction score
0
I don't know what the wonderlick is like, but if they wanted a good test for QBs, it should probably only involve things that involve football. It should probably also include a large section that covers problem solving with a strict time limit. Some neurosurgeons estimate that there are BILLIONS of forms of intelligence, each mapped in a different area of the brain. If the wonderlick is asking questions about chemistry or electronics, I'd say they have a pretty stupid test, because those areas of the brain will never be accessed during a football game.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
18,572
Reaction score
1,496
kearly":2hbmp0he said:
It should probably also include a large section that covers problem solving with a strict time limit.

That's exactly what the Wonderlic is. In many ways, it's a speed-of-processing test - exactly what you'd want to test a QB in.
 

DavidSeven

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
5,742
Reaction score
0
Well, you guys aren't exactly trying to answer 50 of these in 12 minutes with $10 million+ at stake. Plus, they're lifelong football players, so you know...
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
DavidSeven":2hrcclsg said:
Well, you guys aren't exactly trying to answer 50 of these in 12 minutes with $10 million+ at stake. Plus, they're lifelong football players, so you know...

Tension and simply not caring are big parts of lower scores.
 

lukerguy

Active member
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
2,320
Reaction score
20
I scored a 40...granted it was the 3rd time I took it...
The questions aren't difficult provided that you get used to answering each question in 20 S or less.
 

Subzero717

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
10,109
Reaction score
89
Location
Is Everything
Marcellus Whiley said that if you take it backwards you'll score higher. Maybe Tannehill and Lindley saw that episode of nfl live and Griffin and Wilson did not.
 

Hawks46

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
0
Damn, so Wilson's brain is stunted along with the rest of him ? How is he going to survive next year ?

I'd also seriously question Teachers scoring an average of 28. My wife was a teacher, so I've met a ton of them in social and classroom settings. They're not any more intelligent than the average person; better educated, yes. But's it's also scary how low the intelligence of the average person is.
 

HawkHack

New member
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
269
Reaction score
0
I suspect being a good QB involves having an extraordinary memory and concept of motion (routes, trajectories, and so on), as well as superb pattern recognition -- and of those skills, the wonderlic tests seem to only test pattern recognition. If you watched the Gruden's QB Camp video, it's clear that RW has all of those skills.

[46 on my first try on the timed 15-question test. But I'm a math geek, and those sorts of tests tend to be very favorable to us math geeks.]
 

seahawks875

New member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
The wonderlic test is all math, I'm surprised some people score so low. I took it and scored a 41, Russell Wilson is football smart, not as much book smart. Andrew luck went to Stanford so he therefore scored high on the test, Ryan Fitzpatrick went to Harvard so that's why he scored so high
 

pehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
1,738
Tannehill was that high? I mean, really? He HAD to have lucked/guessed right a few times. I like him as a QB, but dude's Terry Bradshaw dumb.
 

Latest posts

Top