Wide Zone Fit?

Seattle Person

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2021
Messages
482
Reaction score
554
With the hires of Klint Kubiak and John Benton, there is going to be an emphasis on Wide Zone blocking and running. There will be other blocking concepts as well such as Pin & Pull and Split Zone. There will be Gap concepts and Duos as well.

People have also suggested or debated about whether Ken Walker or Zach Charbonnet will be the better fit in a wide zone scheme. Walker has the speed and shiftiness to be a star in this type of offense. We've seen guys that have great explosiveness flourish in this type of scheme. Players like Kamara and McCaffrey in recent memories. I think he can do it.

However, I want to examine one thing people seem to forget. Zach Charbonnet has already played in this type of running scheme. Under Chip Kelly at UCLA Charbonnet was the featured back and feasted in this system. He was one of the most decisive cut back runners when running wide zone. His footwork and vision really stood out. Charbonnet is a fit in this scheme because he's already done it. His numbers were amazing:

2021: 1,137 yards: 5.6 per: 13 rushing TDs: 94.8 yards per game.

2022: 1,359 yards: 7.0 per: 14 rushing TDs: 134.9 yards per game.




Article: https://coachkoufootball.substack.c...ucla-offense?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
 

Chukarhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,088
Reaction score
2,773
Walker's vision is his worst enemy. Stellar talent but he needs work in that department.
 

DarkVictory23

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
2,012
Reaction score
2,993
I honestly expect both to do well. Just having a consistent rushing scheme, a base style attack, getting consistent reps in that... that alone will be amazing. Haven't had that in a while.

Charbs more decisive cutback is definitely a key talent to have, especially on those wide zone runs. Walker is a little too quick to be looking for that opening that may not actually be there when if he just stuck to the track and trusted the process, he's left a few yards on the table that way.

Where I think he will have the advantage is when he does stick to it and the play is bursting wide to the outside, he's going to be faster to that edge and when you string out the entire front of a defense and get to that second level, that's when he's going to be able break some ankles.


I'm truly hoping we end up in more of a 1/2 Punch (ala Detroit) vs. Starter/Backup situation next year.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
13,434
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Delaware
Walker has had issues with making the proper read before, relying on athleticism and agility to make plays outside of the designed structure and opting to bounce vs. taking the designed hole. If Walker cleans that up, he's got the talent to be an absolute gamebreaker and routinely slash defenses for chunk gains.

Charbonnet's running style is perfect for this scheme. Build up steam while reading the concept, one decisive cut, take the hole, linemen should escalate to the second level to take on linebackers, shoulder down, punish a defensive back, fall forward. Charbonnet has always reminded me a bit of Cedric Benson in running style - this scheme could unlock the hell out of him.

I love the possibilities for our current RB1 and RB2. Something tells me, however, that K9 could fall out of favor if he doesn't improve in terms of reliably reading the outside zone properly. That won't fly here anymore.
 

Appyhawk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Messages
4,626
Reaction score
2,532
Location
Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montan
Walker has had issues with making the proper read before, relying on athleticism and agility to make plays outside of the designed structure and opting to bounce vs. taking the designed hole. If Walker cleans that up, he's got the talent to be an absolute gamebreaker and routinely slash defenses for chunk gains.

Charbonnet's running style is perfect for this scheme. Build up steam while reading the concept, one decisive cut, take the hole, linemen should escalate to the second level to take on linebackers, shoulder down, punish a defensive back, fall forward. Charbonnet has always reminded me a bit of Cedric Benson in running style - this scheme could unlock the hell out of him.

I love the possibilities for our current RB1 and RB2. Something tells me, however, that K9 could fall out of favor if he doesn't improve in terms of reliably reading the outside zone properly. That won't fly here anymore.
I like RB3 for this scheme. Good hands, great cuts, surprising speed and power and ain't shy at blocking either. We have a terrific running back room.
 

Kamcussionator

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
760
Reaction score
1,179
Location
San Diego, CA
Echoing what others have said, Walker's indecisiveness is what's going to kill him in this offense. Charbonnet and McIntosh may actually outproduce him unless he can develop his 1-cut skill.
 

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
517
Reaction score
580
I'm hoping to see some 2 back looks with Walker and Charbonnet on the field. Charbonnet does everything reasonably well. I think he would be a great lead blocker for Walker.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
2,460
Location
Spokane
Since this thread is about Kubiak and Benton, I have a question. Does anyone know their track record in assessing offensive linemen prospects?

It takes most offensive linemen a couple of years to finally start to get it together. It’s one of the more difficult positions to succeed as a rookie. Or so I’ve heard. I’m no o line expert in any way. I was just happy when they opened holes for me.

Maybe they see something in the young guys looking for a job. None of us have any access to the inside assessments by the guys who are paid to do that. Some folks are just better at seeing young potential talent. Are Kubiak and Benton particularly good at this part of their jobs? Has player acquisition been a big part of their success?
 
OP
OP
S

Seattle Person

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2021
Messages
482
Reaction score
554
Since this thread is about Kubiak and Benton, I have a question. Does anyone know their track record in assessing offensive linemen prospects?

It takes most offensive linemen a couple of years to finally start to get it together. It’s one of the more difficult positions to succeed as a rookie. Or so I’ve heard. I’m no o line expert in any way. I was just happy when they opened holes for me.

Maybe they see something in the young guys looking for a job. None of us have any access to the inside assessments by the guys who are paid to do that. Some folks are just better at seeing young potential talent. Are Kubiak and Benton particularly good at this part of their jobs? Has player acquisition been a big part of their success?

Almost every team Benton has been with has taken an Olinemen in the first round.

He likes athletic guys and he believes the right side should be able to do what the left side does.
 

Fresno Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2021
Messages
851
Reaction score
795
Walker needs to have more patience as a runner. If he can do that he will be Elite. Plus when he dose run inside he is always getting hurt. This new system fits Charbs, and Macintosh's skill sett better imop.
 

Shane Falco

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,325
Reaction score
1,440
It takes most offensive linemen a couple of years to finally start to get it together. It’s one of the more difficult positions to succeed as a rookie. Or so I’ve heard. I’m no o line expert in any way. I was just happy when they opened holes for me.

There were 6 to 8 rookie offensive linemen (off the top of my head) this past season that had solid to really good seasons from the last draft alone.
 

GemCity

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
4,290
Call me crazy but, I’d rather Charb be the starter/get most of the reps.

🤷
 

Appyhawk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Messages
4,626
Reaction score
2,532
Location
Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montan
I have always felt being the 'starter' was over hyped. Having the RB room work as a team is the best approach. I think our RB room has the makings to be a deadly combination and interchangeable from down to down. I betcha Kubiak salivates admiring the RB roster he has to work with now.
 

WestCoastChippewa

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 7, 2023
Messages
444
Reaction score
430
Location
Kenai, AK
Walker has had issues with making the proper read before, relying on athleticism and agility to make plays outside of the designed structure and opting to bounce vs. taking the designed hole. If Walker cleans that up, he's got the talent to be an absolute gamebreaker and routinely slash defenses for chunk gains.

Charbonnet's running style is perfect for this scheme. Build up steam while reading the concept, one decisive cut, take the hole, linemen should escalate to the second level to take on linebackers, shoulder down, punish a defensive back, fall forward. Charbonnet has always reminded me a bit of Cedric Benson in running style - this scheme could unlock the hell out of him.

I love the possibilities for our current RB1 and RB2. Something tells me, however, that K9 could fall out of favor if he doesn't improve in terms of reliably reading the outside zone properly. That won't fly here anymore.
I don't see walker falling out of favor. Have you ever see him catch the football?
 

Latest posts

Top