original poster
New member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,201
- Reaction score
- 1
I'm going to order a Graham Jersey asap!
Jim Otto Oakland Raiders Double 0 or 00. Also I remember a Saint I think 60s era with 00.Dang3Russ":32yfwc3f said:The Proshop is showing 0 for his jersey. Usure whether that is the number he is going with it, or just because it's still undecided. Are you even allowed to have 0 in the NFL? Can't remember even seeing that, only in the NBA.
80 should never be worn again ... Largent trumps everyone.
Either way, what ever number he chooses, it'll still look good cause it's on a Seattle Jersey!
#GoHawks
MVP53":34qwma2y said:Since I have an odd sense of humor and enjoy when players choose the oddest and most aesthetically unappealing number they can, I'd love it if Graham went with 43, 44 or 47, something like that. I'm chuckling just thinking about it.
stack600":21jozurh said:Jim Otto Oakland Raiders Double 0 or 00. Also I remember a Saint I think 60s era with 00.Dang3Russ":21jozurh said:The Proshop is showing 0 for his jersey. Usure whether that is the number he is going with it, or just because it's still undecided. Are you even allowed to have 0 in the NFL? Can't remember even seeing that, only in the NBA.
ThisKamcussionator":1wnvw3qm said:Give him 83 and see if he can protect a slant route with his body...
Hawks46":30tatcf2 said:MVP53":30tatcf2 said:Since I have an odd sense of humor and enjoy when players choose the oddest and most aesthetically unappealing number they can, I'd love it if Graham went with 43, 44 or 47, something like that. I'm chuckling just thinking about it.
What the heck is wrong with 44 ? How is it unappealing ? I wore it in high school (and 46), and the great Bosworth wore 44 in college. Plus you have 44 magnum.![]()
MVP53":i3woh5cf said:To be clear, for a LB, it is fine. But, a TE wearing 44, or anything in the 40s for that matter? Just wouldn't look right, which is why I hope he does it. Wasn't picking on 44 specifically.
253hawk":298ab7wa said:MVP53":298ab7wa said:To be clear, for a LB, it is fine. But, a TE wearing 44, or anything in the 40s for that matter? Just wouldn't look right, which is why I hope he does it. Wasn't picking on 44 specifically.
Chris Cooley was #47 and Dallas Clark was #44. There's always a handful floating around the league.
Just as some say they can't concentrate on my posts, I can't concentrate on yours.IJHSIDGF-ML":38f1wonl said:ThisKamcussionator":38f1wonl said:Give him 83 and see if he can protect a slant route with his body...