We can't blame Bevell this week.

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
41,819
Reaction score
4,636
Location
Roy Wa.
Running game was there all night with whomever we put in.

Bubbles worked, we even had some screens with Collins working, had balls going to the FB, deep passing game was there for the taking, line played well enough to win and Wilson had the time to get throws off.

This is on the players who did not execute or finish on plays when it comes to the offense.

Defense was given short fields to play on all night and were on the field a lot, they needed to get more pressure on Rogers and they let a guy who plays WR and not been a running back since his Sophomore year in College I think they said beat them, although the guy looks good at RB.

If we had scored on any two of those three passing plays where we would have been in the end zone this is a whole different game.
 

Year of The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
368
Location
Idaho
DOnt worry people will throw him under the bus even if we scored 40. Like last week.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,974
Reaction score
3,146
Location
Renton, WA
According to stats, the Seahawk offense had the ball for longer TOP than the Packers did. Packers were more efficient with their opportunities than the Seahawks were. Packers beat the Seahawks, as the Seahawks have beaten other teams. They did a better job of playing the Seahawks game than the Seahawks did. Seahawks committed 6 TOs. The Packers made them pay.
 

WilsonMVP

New member
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
2,771
Reaction score
0
hawkfan68":3nqmx5sx said:
According to stats, the Seahawk offense had the ball for longer TOP than the Packers did. Packers were more efficient with their opportunities than the Seahawks were. Packers beat the Seahawks, as the Seahawks have beaten other teams. They did a better job of playing the Seahawks game than the Seahawks did. Seahawks committed 6 TOs. The Packers made them pay.


You typcially would have shorter TOP when you start at the opponents 30 yard line or closer 3 times in the game lmao....and start at the opponents 39 from turnover on downs and another at opponents 48 from a bad punt. Srs....3 drives they started on offense were allready in FG range and 5 total drives started in Seattle Territory
 

NFSeahawks

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
0
Not sure the point of this post.

Wilson played like crap, just like Bevell had had his fair share of poop games.

Next.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
10,126
Reaction score
3,729
chris98251":3s28182e said:
Running game was there all night with whomever we put in.

Bubbles worked, we even had some screens with Collins working, had balls going to the FB, deep passing game was there for the taking, line played well enough to win and Wilson had the time to get throws off.

This is on the players who did not execute or finish on plays when it comes to the offense.

Defense was given short fields to play on all night and were on the field a lot, they needed to get more pressure on Rogers and they let a guy who plays WR and not been a running back since his Sophomore year in College I think they said beat them, although the guy looks good at RB.

If we had scored on any two of those three passing plays where we would have been in the end zone this is a whole different game.
I agree with this..
 

slateman77

Active member
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
298
Reaction score
158
Bevell..??...Rusty pooped the bed today...Totally..!!..Receivers..Yeppers..them too....Things will get better...I still have faith ....I still believe we'll make a run...but my faith is waning.....
 

Latest posts

Top